Learning Newtonian Physics through Programming Robot Experiments

Novel technology has been applied to improve students’ learning abilities in different disciplines. The research in this field is still finding suitable methodologies, tools, and evaluation mechanisms to devise learning frameworks with high impact on students’ performance. This article describes an instructional method to perform Newtonian physics experiments by programming a mobile robot. Such experiments allow the learners to design, implement and visualize physics concepts, thus using the robot as a cognitive tool or mindtool. An accurate assessment of the students learning gain, involving 29 high-school students, shows that the proposed method provided significant improvements in the students understanding of the first Newton’s law, the second Newton law and the superposition principle. The learning gain has been measured through the Force Concept Inventory questionnaire. From this study, we can state that programming a mobile robot to perform physics experiments can improve knowledge about Newtonian physics, even without giving specific lectures in the subject and with a much shorter lecture plan with respect to traditional lectures.

[1]  Michael J. Timms Letting Artificial Intelligence in Education Out of the Box: Educational Cobots and Smart Classrooms , 2016, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[2]  Catherine J. Stevens,et al.  A review of the applicability of robots in education , 2013 .

[3]  Andrew N. Marshall,et al.  Tips for creating a block language with blockly , 2017, 2017 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (B&B).

[4]  E Roseman,et al.  Collaborative Problem-Solving , 1985, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[5]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) An Autonomous Educational Mobile Robot Mediator , 2022 .

[6]  Marina Tomara,et al.  Instructional strategies to promote conceptual change about force and motion: A review of the literature , 2017 .

[7]  Jeffrey Too Chuan Tan,et al.  Bridging Robotics Education between High School and University: RoboCup@Home Education , 2019, 2019 IEEE AFRICON.

[8]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Multiple approaches to understanding , 2009 .

[9]  M. Rescigno,et al.  PROMOTING THE PHYSICS LABORATORY WITH LAB2GO , 2017 .

[10]  Dimitris Alimisis Robotics in Education & Education in Robotics : Shifting Focus from Technology to Pedagogy , 2012 .

[11]  Eleanor C. Sayre,et al.  Secondary analysis of teaching methods in introductory physics: A 50 k-student study , 2016, 1603.00516.

[12]  Yuxin Ma,et al.  Acquisition of Physics Content Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry Skills in a Robotics Summer Camp , 2007 .

[13]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[14]  R. Pea Beyond Amplification : Using the Computer to Reorganize Mental Functioning , 1985 .

[15]  Sami Paavola,et al.  Abduction with Dialogical and Trialogical Means , 2006, Log. J. IGPL.

[16]  Neil Fraser,et al.  Ten things we've learned from Blockly , 2015, 2015 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (Blocks and Beyond).

[17]  Lei Bao,et al.  Concentration analysis: A quantitative assessment of student states , 2001 .

[18]  D. Perkins,et al.  Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies , 1991 .

[19]  Birgit Lugrin,et al.  Female Robots as Role-Models? - The Influence of Robot Gender and Learning Materials on Learning Success , 2018, AIED.

[20]  Erin Walker,et al.  ROBIN: Using a Programmable Robot to Provide Feedback and Encouragement on Programming Tasks , 2018, AIED.

[21]  Jörgen Lindh,et al.  Does lego training stimulate pupils' ability to solve logical problems? , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Chris Rogers,et al.  Physics With Robotics - Using LEGO MINDSTORMS In High School Education , 2010, AAAI Spring Symposium: Educational Robotics and Beyond.

[23]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities and Three Metaphors of Learning , 2004 .

[24]  H. Sluiter [Learning by doing]. , 1977, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[25]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking , 1998 .

[26]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  Common sense concepts about motion , 1985 .

[27]  Richard Vaughan,et al.  Massively multi-robot simulation in stage , 2008, Swarm Intelligence.

[28]  Paola Ferrarelli,et al.  Methodology and Results on Teaching Maths Using Mobile Robots , 2017, ROBOT.

[29]  R. Hake Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[30]  Sami Paavola,et al.  From meaning making to joint construction of knowledge practices and artefacts: a trialogical approach to CSCL , 2009, CSCL.

[31]  Ghazi Shukur,et al.  The Effect of LEGO Training on Pupils' School Performance in Mathematics, Problem Solving Ability and Attitude: Swedish Data , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[32]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Can a Social Robot Stimulate Science Curiosity in Classrooms? , 2015, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[33]  Gina Bullock,et al.  Using technology summer camp to stimulate the interest of female high school students in technology careers , 2016, 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET).

[34]  David Hestenes,et al.  Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller , 1995 .

[35]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments , 1999 .

[36]  H. White,et al.  Quasi-Experimental Design and Methods , 2014 .

[37]  F. Tanaka,et al.  Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning , 2012, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[38]  Ben Van Dusen,et al.  Comparison of Normalized Gain and Cohen's "d" for Analyzing Gains on Concept Inventories. , 2016, 1612.09180.

[39]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[40]  Lei Bao Concentration Analysis : A Quantitative Assessment of Student States , 2000 .

[41]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory , 1999 .

[42]  Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti,et al.  Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[43]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Beyond Amplification: Using the Computer To Reorganize Mental Functioning. Technical Report No. 38. , 1985 .