Sharing and re-using open data: A case study of motivations in astrophysics

Open data sharing and re-use is currently more common in some academic disciplines than others. Although each discipline has unique challenges and characteristics which can influence data sharing and re-use behavior, it may be possible to gain transferable insight from disciplines where these practices are more common. Several studies of the motivations underlying data sharing and re-use have been conducted, however these studies often remain at a high level of abstraction rather than providing in-depth insight about discipline-specific challenges and opportunities. This study sought to provide in-depth insight about the complex interaction of factors influencing motivations for sharing and re-using open research data within a single discipline, namely astrophysics. We focused on this discipline due to its well-developed tradition of free and open access to research data. Eight factors were found to influence researchers’ motivations for sharing data openly, including the researcher's background, personal drivers, experience, legislation, regulation and policy, data characteristics, performance expectancy, usability, and collaboration. We identified six factors that influence researchers’ motivations to re-use open research data, including the researcher's background, facilitating conditions, expected performance, social and affiliation factors, effort and experience. Finally, we discuss how data sharing and re-use can be encouraged within the context of astrophysics research, and we discuss how these insights may be transferred to disciplines with low rates of data sharing and re-use.

[1]  Rajeev Alasseri,et al.  Conceptual framework for introducing incentive-based demand response programs for retail electricity markets , 2018 .

[2]  S Van Beek,et al.  INNOVATION AND COLLABORATION , 2001 .

[3]  Jedrzej Rybicki,et al.  Towards flexible Open Data management solutions , 2017, 2017 40th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO).

[4]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[5]  Anneke Zuiderwijk,et al.  Analysing Open Data in Virtual Research Environments: New Collaboration Opportunities to Improve Policy Making , 2017, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[6]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic, and Social Development , 2004, Data Sci. J..

[7]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[8]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  Marylène Gagné A model of knowledge‐sharing motivation , 2009 .

[10]  E. Hirschman,et al.  The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun , 1982 .

[11]  Thomas R. Lindlof Qualitative Communication Research Methods , 1994 .

[12]  J. V. Lucke,et al.  Open Government and (Linked) (Open) (Government) (Data) , 2012 .

[13]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Who Shares? Who Doesn't? Factors Associated with Openly Archiving Raw Research Data , 2011, PloS one.

[14]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Attitudes and norms affecting scientists’ data reuse , 2017, PloS one.

[15]  Jason F. Cohen,et al.  The Effects of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, Hedonic, and Utilitarian Motivations on IS Usage: An Updated Meta-analytic Investigation , 2017, AMCIS.

[16]  Nathan W. Twyman,et al.  Taking "Fun and Games" Seriously: Proposing the Hedonic-Motivation System Adoption Model (HMSAM) , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Bryn Nelson Data sharing: Empty archives , 2009, Nature.

[18]  E. Brink,et al.  Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis , 2006 .

[19]  D. Bernstein Essentials of Psychology , 1998 .

[20]  Jenny Fry,et al.  Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Aleksandra K Krotoski,et al.  Data-driven research: open data opportunities for growing knowledge, and ethical issues that arise , 2012 .

[22]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Why share data? Lessons learned from the fMRIDC , 2013, NeuroImage.

[23]  Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski,et al.  Making big data open: data sharing in neuroimaging , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[25]  Harlan Yu,et al.  The New Ambiguity of 'Open Government' , 2012 .

[26]  Youngseek Kim,et al.  Attitudinal, normative, and resource factors affecting psychologists' intentions to adopt an open data badge: An empirical analysis , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[27]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  Proposing the Multimotive Information Systems Continuance Model (MISC) to Better Explain End-User System Evaluations and Continuance Intentions , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  V. Vroom Work and motivation , 1964 .

[29]  Eric G Campbell,et al.  Data-sharing and data-withholding in genetics and the life sciences: results of a national survey of technology transfer officers. , 2003, Journal of health care law & policy.

[30]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[31]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[32]  Jennifer C Molloy,et al.  The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Means Better Science , 2011, PLoS biology.

[33]  Dimple Patel,et al.  Research data management: a conceptual framework , 2016 .

[34]  Adams Js Towards an understanding of inequity , 1963 .

[35]  E. Hirschman,et al.  Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions , 1982 .

[36]  Alberto Accomazzi,et al.  Linking Literature and Data: Status Report and Future Efforts , 2011, ArXiv.

[37]  Robert Viseur,et al.  Open Science - Practical Issues in Open Research Data , 2015, DATA.

[38]  Peter Schröder,et al.  Open Data for Global Science , 2007, Data Sci. J..

[39]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Exploring the Motive for Data Publication in Open Data Initiative: Linking Intention to Action , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[40]  Valérie Brasse,et al.  VRE4EIC: A Europe-wide Interoperable Virtual Research Environment to Empower Multidisciplinary Research Communities and Accelerate Innovation and Collaboration , 2016 .

[41]  Edwin Henneken It specialist Unlocking and sharing data in astronomy , 2015 .

[42]  Julie McLeod,et al.  Opening research data: issues and opportunities , 2014 .

[43]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate , 2007, PloS one.

[44]  A. Vickers,et al.  Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals , 2009, PloS one.

[45]  J. Keller Motivational Design of Instruction , 1983 .

[46]  Stafford,et al.  PMC8 USING ATLAS.TI AS A TOOL TO EXTRACT AND SYNTHESIZE DATA OBTAINED IN LITERATURE REVIEWING , 2009 .

[47]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Unending work and care: Managing chronic illness at home. , 1989 .

[48]  R. Batra,et al.  Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes , 1991 .

[49]  Jun Ma,et al.  Assessing the Extent and Impact of Online Data Sharing in Eddy Covariance Flux Research , 2018 .

[50]  Alice Lam,et al.  What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? , 2011 .

[51]  Anneke Zuiderwijk,et al.  Open data infrastructures: The design of an infrastructure to enhance the coordination of open data use , 2015 .

[52]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  The what, why, and how of born-open data , 2015, Behavior Research Methods.

[53]  C. B. Ferster,et al.  Schedules of reinforcement , 1957 .

[54]  Paolo Giommi,et al.  Long-Term Multi-Band and Polarimetric View of Mkn 421: Motivations for an Integrated Open-Data Platform for Blazar Optical Polarimetry , 2017 .

[55]  James Campbell Access to Scientific Data in the 21st Century: Rationale and Illustrative Usage Rights Review , 2014, Data Sci. J..

[56]  James Regetz,et al.  Advances in global change research require open science by individual researchers , 2012 .

[57]  Edwin A. Henneken Unlocking and sharing data in astronomy , 2015 .

[58]  Benedikt Fecher,et al.  What Drives Academic Data Sharing? , 2014, PloS one.

[59]  G. W. Walster,et al.  New directions in equity research. , 1973 .

[60]  S. Ceci Scientists’ Attitudes toward Data Sharing , 1988 .

[61]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[62]  J. Keller Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach , 2009 .

[63]  Laura Rothfritz,et al.  FAIR Data Principles , 2019, The ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication.

[64]  Tiffany Derville Gallicano,et al.  Relationship management with the Millennial generation of public relations agency employees , 2013 .

[65]  B. Skinner Contingencies of reinforcement : a theoretical analysis , 1969 .

[66]  Alberto Pepe,et al.  How Do Astronomers Share Data? Reliability and Persistence of Datasets Linked in AAS Publications and a Qualitative Study of Data Practices among US Astronomers , 2014, PloS one.

[67]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[68]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Open data: Quality over quantity , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[69]  Hailey Mooney,et al.  The Anatomy of a Data Citation: Discovery, Reuse, and Credit , 2012 .

[70]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[71]  Allison W. McCulloch,et al.  Developing and Using a Codebook for the Analysis of Interview Data: An Example from a Professional Development Research Project , 2011 .

[72]  C. Borgman,et al.  If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology , 2013, PloS one.

[73]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Data reuse and the open data citation advantage , 2013, PeerJ.