Early visual ERP sensitivity to the species and animacy of faces

Assessing the agency of potential actors in the visual world is a critically important aspect of social cognition. Adult observers are generally capable of distinguishing real faces from artificial faces (even allowing for recent advances in graphics technology and motion capture); even small deviations from real facial appearance can lead to profound effects on face recognition. Presently, we examined how early components of visual event-related potentials (ERPs) are affected by the "life" in human faces and animal faces. We presented participants with real and artificial faces of humans and dogs, and analyzed the response properties of the P100 and the N170 as a function of stimulus appearance and task (species categorization vs. animacy categorization). The P100 exhibited sensitivity to face species and animacy. We found that the N170's differential responses to human faces vs. dog faces depended on the task participants' performed. Also, the effect of species was only evident for real faces of humans and dogs, failing to obtain with artificial faces. These results suggest that face animacy does modulate early components of visual ERPs-the N170 is not merely a crude face detector, but reflects the tuning of the visual system to natural face appearance.

[1]  Richard Russell,et al.  Aspects of Facial Contrast Decrease with Age and Are Cues for Age Perception , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Configural processing of other-race faces is delayed but not decreased , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[3]  T. Wheatley,et al.  The Tipping Point of Animacy , 2010, Psychological science.

[4]  Benjamin Balas,et al.  EEG correlates of categorical and graded face perception , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  S. Tobimatsu,et al.  Early ERP components differentially extract facial features: Evidence for spatial frequency-and-contrast detectors , 2008, Neurosciences research.

[6]  G. Yovel,et al.  TMS Evidence for the Involvement of the Right Occipital Face Area in Early Face Processing , 2007, Current Biology.

[7]  Michèle Fabre-Thorpe,et al.  Animal and human faces in natural scenes: How specific to human faces is the N170 ERP component? , 2004, Journal of vision.

[8]  C. Joyce,et al.  The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: The effect of reference electrode site , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Jun'ichiro Seyama,et al.  The Uncanny Valley: Effect of Realism on the Impression of Artificial Human Faces , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[12]  A. L. Humphrey,et al.  Kernel- and model-based predictions of grating responses in monkey and cat visual cortex , 2004 .

[13]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[14]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Expertise and own-race bias in face processing: an event-related potential study , 2008, Neuroreport.

[15]  Holger Wiese,et al.  The role of age and ethnic group in face recognition memory: ERP evidence from a combined own-age and own-race bias study , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[16]  Emanuela Bricolo,et al.  Do all kids look alike? Evidence for an other-age effect in adults. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Guillaume Thierry,et al.  Face-Sensitive Processes One Hundred Milliseconds after Picture Onset , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[18]  S. Luck.  An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[19]  Anna Weinberg,et al.  Mind Perception: Real but Not Artificial Faces Sustain Neural Activity beyond the N170/VPP , 2011, PloS one.

[20]  O. Pascalis,et al.  On the species-specificity of face recognition in human adults , 2004 .

[21]  B. Rossion,et al.  Event-related potentials and time course of the ‘other-race’ face classification advantage , 2004, Neuroreport.

[22]  M. Herrmann,et al.  Early stages (P100) of face perception in humans as measured with event-related potentials (ERPs) , 2004, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[23]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  J. B. Pittenger,et al.  Wrinkling and head shape as coordinated sources of age-level information , 1980 .

[25]  M. Eimer.  The face‐specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[26]  Guillaume Thierry,et al.  Is the N170 peak of visual event-related brain potentials car-selective? , 2009, Neuroreport.

[27]  R. Malpass,et al.  Recognition for faces of own and other race. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Lara J Pierce,et al.  The neural plasticity of other-race face recognition , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  Roxane J. Itier,et al.  Species sensitivity of early face and eye processing , 2011, NeuroImage.

[30]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Sensitivity to the proportions of faces that vary in human likeness , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  B. Balas,et al.  You Can Take the Eyes Out of the Doll, But… , 2012, Perception.

[33]  M. Herrmann,et al.  The other-race effect for face perception: an event-related potential study , 2007, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[34]  Benjamin Balas,et al.  The role of face shape and pigmentation in other-race face perception: An electrophysiological study , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Mary J. Bravo,et al.  Perceptual discrimination of computer generated and photographic faces , 2012, Digit. Investig..

[36]  Guillaume Thierry,et al.  Is the N170 sensitive to the human face or to several intertwined perceptual and conceptual factors? , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Clara D. Martin,et al.  Controlling for interstimulus perceptual variance abolishes N170 face selectivity , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Holger Wiese,et al.  Daily-life contact affects the own-age bias and neural correlates of face memory in elderly participants , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.