Constructive Contrasts Between Modeled and Measured Climate Responses Over a Regional Scale

Reducing uncertainty in predictions of regional-scale models depends on meaningful contrasts with field measurements. This paper introduces a two-stage process that works from the premise that an appropriate goal for regional models is to produce reasonable behavior over dominant environmental gradients. We demonstrate two techniques for contrasting models with data, one based on the shape of modeled relationships (functional contrasts) and the other based on an examination of the residuals (residual contrasts) between the model and an empirically derived surface fit to field data. Functional contrasts evaluated the differences between the response of simulated net primary production (NPP) to climate variables and the response observed in field measurements of NPP. Residual contrasts compared deviations of NPP from the empirical surface to identify groupings (for example, vegetation classes, geographic regions) with model deviations different from those of the field data. In all model–data contrasts, we assigned sample weights to field measurements to ensure unbiased representation of the region, and we included both constructive comparisons and formal statistical tests. In general, we learned more from constructive methods designed to reveal structure or pattern in discrepancy than we did from statistical tests designed to falsify models. Although our constructive methods were more subjective and less concise, they succeeded in revealing gaps in our understanding of regional-scale processes that can guide future efforts to reduce scientific uncertainty. This was best illustrated by NPP predictions from the Biome-BGC model, which showed a stronger response to precipitation than apparently operates in the field. In another case, differences revealed in savanna and dry woodlands had insufficient field-data support, suggesting a need for future field studies to improve understanding in this, and other, poorly studied ecosystems.

[1]  A. W. Küchler Potential Natural Vegetation of the Conterminous United States , 1965 .

[2]  R. Levins The strategy of model building in population biology , 1966 .

[3]  H. Lieth Modeling the Primary Productivity of the World , 1975 .

[4]  H. Odum,et al.  Primary Productivity of the Biosphere , 1978, Ecological Studies.

[5]  H. Charles Romesburg,et al.  WILDLIFE SCIENCE: GAINING RELIABLE KNOWLEDGE , 1981 .

[6]  S. Weisberg Plots, transformations, and regression , 1985 .

[7]  W. Parton,et al.  Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands , 1987 .

[8]  D. Griffith,et al.  Advanced Spatial Statistics: Special Topics in the Exploration of Quantitative Spatial Data Series , 1988 .

[9]  W. Parton,et al.  Primary Production of the Central Grassland Region of the United States , 1988 .

[10]  Michael J. Sale,et al.  Cokriging to assess regional stream quality in the Southern Blue Ridge Province , 1990 .

[11]  P. Kareiva Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data , 1990 .

[12]  Phillip S. Kott,et al.  A Model-Based Look at Linear Regression with Survey Data , 1991 .

[13]  H. Jager,et al.  Explanatory models for ecological response surfaces , 1991 .

[14]  Boris Zeide,et al.  Quality as a characteristic of ecological models , 1991 .

[15]  D. O. Hall,et al.  Climate Change and Productivity of Natural Grasslands , 1991 .

[16]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Potential Net Primary Productivity in South America: Application of a Global Model. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[17]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  Biophysical, morphological, canopy optical property, and productivity data from the Superior National Forest , 1992 .

[18]  Anthony W King,et al.  Aggregating Fine-Scale Ecological Knowledge to Model Coarser-Scale Attributes of Ecosystems. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[19]  S. Running,et al.  Simulated dry matter yields for aspen and spruce stands in the North American boreal forest , 1992 .

[20]  W. Overton,et al.  Using ‘found’ data to augment a probability sample: Procedure and case study , 1993, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[21]  S. Running,et al.  Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, Biome-BGC, and an application for global-scale models. Scaling processes between leaf and landscape levels , 1993 .

[22]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Environmental Modeling with GIS , 1994 .

[23]  S. Running,et al.  8 – Generalization of a Forest Ecosystem Process Model for Other Biomes, BIOME-BGC, and an Application for Global-Scale Models , 1993 .

[24]  A. McGuire,et al.  Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production , 1993, Nature.

[25]  Chung-Hyun Ahn,et al.  Development of Global 30-minute grid Potential Evapotranspiration Data Set , 1994 .

[26]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Environmental Limits on Net Primary Production and Light‐Use Efficiency Across the Oregon Transect , 1994 .

[27]  Vemap Participants Vegetation/ecosystem modeling and analysis project: Comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continental-scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and CO2 doubling , 1995 .

[28]  Edward L. Korn,et al.  Examples of Differing Weighted and Unweighted Estimates from a Sample Survey , 1995 .

[29]  William J. Parton,et al.  The CENTURY model , 1996 .

[30]  David S. Powlson,et al.  Evaluation of Soil Organic Matter Models using Existing, Long-Term Datasets , 1996 .

[31]  R. J. Olson,et al.  Worldwide estimates and bibliography of net primary productivity derived from pre-1982 publications , 1997 .

[32]  Craig Loehle,et al.  A hypothesis testing framework for evaluating ecosystem model performance , 1997 .

[33]  D. Schimel,et al.  CONTINENTAL SCALE VARIABILITY IN ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES: MODELS, DATA, AND THE ROLE OF DISTURBANCE , 1997 .

[34]  L. Magee Improving survey‐weighted least squares regression , 1998 .

[35]  Richard F. Gunst,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[36]  W. Parton,et al.  TERRESTRIAL NPP: TOWARD A CONSISTENT DATA SET FORGLOBAL MODEL EVALUATION , 1999 .