Efficient Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) Modification of Membrane Proteins Requires a C-terminal Anchoring Signal of Marginal Hydrophobicity*

Background: Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor addition occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Results: Efficient GPI signals have marginal hydrophobicity, intermediate between transmembrane helices and secreted proteins. Conclusion: Proteins released into the ER lumen and those retained in the ER membrane are both bona fide substrates of the GPI anchoring reaction. Significance: The results resolve a long-standing issue regarding the processing of GPI signals. Many plasma membrane proteins are anchored to the membrane via a C-terminal glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) moiety. The GPI anchor is attached to the protein in the endoplasmic reticulum by transamidation, a reaction in which a C-terminal GPI-attachment signal is cleaved off concomitantly with addition of the GPI moiety. GPI-attachment signals are poorly conserved on the sequence level but are all composed of a polar segment that includes the GPI-attachment site followed by a hydrophobic segment located at the very C terminus of the protein. Here, we show that efficient GPI modification requires that the hydrophobicity of the C-terminal segment is “marginal”: less hydrophobic than type II transmembrane anchors and more hydrophobic than the most hydrophobic segments found in secreted proteins. We further show that the GPI-attachment signal can be modified by the transamidase irrespective of whether it is first released into the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum or is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

[1]  S. Brunak,et al.  SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions , 2011, Nature Methods.

[2]  F. Eisenhaber,et al.  Structural insight into the glycosylphosphatidylinositol transamidase subunits PIG-K and PIG-S from yeast. , 2011, Journal of structural biology.

[3]  Morten H. H. Nørholm,et al.  A mutant Pfu DNA polymerase designed for advanced uracil-excision DNA engineering , 2010, BMC biotechnology.

[4]  J. Bitinaite,et al.  DNA Cloning and Engineering by Uracil Excision , 2009, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[5]  Pier Luigi Martelli,et al.  PredGPI: a GPI-anchor predictor , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[6]  M. Bernardo,et al.  MT4-(MMP17) and MT6-MMP (MMP25), A unique set of membrane-anchored matrix metalloproteinases: properties and expression in cancer , 2008, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[7]  G. Heijne,et al.  Molecular code for transmembrane-helix recognition by the Sec61 translocon , 2007, Nature.

[8]  Xin Chen,et al.  FragAnchor: A Large-Scale Predictor of Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchors in Eukaryote Protein Sequences by Qualitative Scoring , 2007, Genom. Proteom. Bioinform..

[9]  G. von Heijne,et al.  High-throughput fluorescent-based optimization of eukaryotic membrane protein overexpression and purification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Sofia Johansson,et al.  Stable insertion of Alzheimer Aβ peptide into the ER membrane strongly correlates with its length , 2007, FEBS letters.

[11]  Anant K. Menon,et al.  Thematic review series: Lipid Posttranslational Modifications. GPI anchoring of protein in yeast and mammalian cells, or: how we learned to stop worrying and love glycophospholipids Published, JLR Papers in Press, March 14, 2007. , 2007, Journal of Lipid Research.

[12]  H. Schägger Tricine–SDS-PAGE , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[13]  G. Heijne,et al.  Recognition of transmembrane helices by the endoplasmic reticulum translocon , 2005, Nature.

[14]  G. Heijne,et al.  Positively charged amino acids placed next to a signal sequence block protein translocation more efficiently in Escherichia coli than in mammalian microsomes , 1993, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[15]  S. Muthukrishnan,et al.  A chloroplast DNA deletion located in RNA polymerase gene rpoC2 in CMS lines of sorghum , 2004, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[16]  N. Bulleid,et al.  The Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Translocon Can Differentiate between Hydrophobic Sequences Allowing Signals for Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchor Addition to Be Fully Translocated into the ER Lumen* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  J. Plasencia,et al.  Cloning and characterization of a COBRA-like gene expressed de novo during maize germination , 2003, Seed Science Research.

[18]  N. Hooper,et al.  Glycosylation efficiency of Asn-Xaa-Thr sequons is independent of distance from the C-terminus in membrane dipeptidase. , 2003, Glycobiology.

[19]  Y. Hiroi,et al.  Proprotein interaction with the GPI transamidase , 2003, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[20]  Y. Maeda,et al.  Structural Requirements for the Recruitment of Gaa1 into a Functional Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Transamidase Complex* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  Constance E. Brinckerhoff,et al.  Matrix metalloproteinases: a tail of a frog that became a prince , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[22]  A. Menon,et al.  Endoplasmic reticulum proteins involved in glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchor attachment: photocrosslinking studies in a cell-free system. , 2001, European journal of biochemistry.

[23]  N. Hooper,et al.  Membrane topology influences N‐glycosylation of the prion protein , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[24]  G. Hart,et al.  Detection of Glycophospholipid Anchors on Proteins , 1993, Current protocols in protein science.

[25]  R. Chen,et al.  Comparative efficiencies of C‐terminal signals of native glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI)‐anchored proproteins in conferring GPI‐anchoring , 2001, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[26]  G von Heijne,et al.  Glycosylation Efficiency of Asn-Xaa-Thr Sequons Depends Both on the Distance from the C Terminus and on the Presence of a Downstream Transmembrane Segment* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  H. Riezman,et al.  Gaa1p and gpi8p are components of a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) transamidase that mediates attachment of GPI to proteins. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[28]  P. Bork,et al.  Prediction of potential GPI-modification sites in proprotein sequences. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  G. von Heijne,et al.  N-tail translocation in a eukaryotic polytopic membrane protein: synergy between neighboring transmembrane segments. , 1999, European journal of biochemistry.

[30]  J. Wang,et al.  Recognition of the carboxyl-terminal signal for GPI modification requires translocation of its hydrophobic domain across the ER membrane. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Proline-induced disruption of a transmembrane alpha-helix in its natural environment. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  P Bork,et al.  Sequence properties of GPI-anchored proteins near the omega-site: constraints for the polypeptide binding site of the putative transamidase. , 1998, Protein engineering.

[33]  M. Ratnam,et al.  The hydrophobic domains in the carboxyl-terminal signal for GPI modification and in the amino-terminal leader peptide have similar structural requirements. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  M. Baumann,et al.  Structural composition and functional characterization of soluble CD59: heterogeneity of the oligosaccharide and glycophosphoinositol (GPI) anchor revealed by laser-desorption mass spectrometric analysis. , 1996, The Biochemical journal.

[35]  M. Ratnam,et al.  Preferred sites of glycosylphosphatidylinositol modification in folate receptors and constraints in the primary structure of the hydrophobic portion of the signal. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[36]  S. Srinivasan,et al.  Ligands for the receptor tyrosine kinases hek and elk: isolation of cDNAs encoding a family of proteins. , 1995, Oncogene.

[37]  S Udenfriend,et al.  How glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins are made. , 1995, Annual review of biochemistry.

[38]  G von Heijne,et al.  The COOH-terminal ends of internal signal and signal-anchor sequences are positioned differently in the ER translocase , 1994, Journal of Cell Biology.

[39]  S. Howell,et al.  A cleavable N-terminal signal peptide is not a prerequisite for the biosynthesis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[40]  G von Heijne,et al.  Determination of the distance between the oligosaccharyltransferase active site and the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[41]  S Udenfriend,et al.  Phosphatidylinositol glycan (PI-G) anchored membrane proteins. Amino acid requirements adjacent to the site of cleavage and PI-G attachment in the COOH-terminal signal peptide. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[42]  I. Caras,et al.  Fusion of sequence elements from non-anchored proteins to generate a fully functional signal for glycophosphatidylinositol membrane anchor attachment , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[43]  I. Caras An internally positioned signal can direct attachment of a glycophospholipid membrane anchor , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[44]  K. Kodukula,et al.  Biosynthesis of phosphatidylinositol glycan-anchored membrane proteins. Design of a simple protein substrate to characterize the enzyme that cleaves the COOH-terminal signal peptide. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[45]  G. von Heijne,et al.  A de novo designed signal peptide cleavage cassette functions in vivo. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[46]  G. Weddell,et al.  Signal peptide for protein secretion directing glycophospholipid membrane anchor attachment. , 1989, Science.

[47]  B. Cullen,et al.  COOH-terminal requirements for the correct processing of a phosphatidylinositol-glycan anchored membrane protein. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[48]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Topogenic signals in integral membrane proteins. , 1988, European journal of biochemistry.

[49]  J. Rothman,et al.  Synchronised transmembrane insertion and glycosylation of a nascent membrane protein , 1977, Nature.