Counselling before first trimester abortion and acceptability of the procedure: results from a Slovenian cross-sectional study

Abstract Objectives: In Slovenia, first-trimester abortion is performed at the woman’s request, either surgically under general anaesthesia or medically with mifepristone and misoprostol, in a public hospital. Our study aimed to evaluate pre-abortion counselling and to reveal differences in acceptability and satisfaction with the two abortion methods. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out at Ljubljana University Medical Centre between January and June 2015. Women requesting termination of a pregnancy up to 10 weeks’ gestation voluntarily completed an anonymous questionnaire after the procedure and were divided into a surgical and a medical abortion group. Results: Of the 266 women who were invited to take part, 229 accepted; 16.6% chose a surgical abortion, 83.4% a medical abortion. The most frequent reason cited for requesting an abortion was economic/housing problems. Most women who chose a surgical abortion did so because it was faster, whereas most women who chose a medical abortion did so on the advice of a primary care gynaecologist. Women choosing a surgical abortion had more previous pregnancies and presented with a higher gestational age pregnancy. The choice of method was not related to the woman’s age. There were no differences in acceptability of the two procedures. Pain during the procedure was, however, more severe in the medical abortion group (p = .026), along with bleeding, nausea and chills; there were no differences in severity of vomiting, diarrhoea, dizziness or headache between the groups. Women in the surgical abortion group reported higher satisfaction with the method (p < .001). The study revealed a low frequency of pre-abortion contraceptive counselling. Conclusion: The most common reason given for choosing a surgical abortion was the speed of the procedure; for a medical abortion, it was on the advice of a primary care gynaecologist. Satisfaction was higher with the surgical abortion method. There were no differences in general acceptability of the methods.

[1]  Lauren Christiansen-Lindquist,et al.  Predictors of More Effective Contraceptive Method Use at 12 Weeks Post-Abortion: A Prospective Cohort Study. , 2019, Journal of women's health.

[2]  Duolao Wang,et al.  Comparative satisfaction of receiving medical abortion service from nurses and auxiliary nurse-midwives or doctors in Nepal: results of a randomized trial , 2017, Reproductive Health.

[3]  C. Fiala,et al.  Assessment of pain during medical abortion with home use of misoprostol , 2017, European journal of contraception & reproductive health care.

[4]  S. Suhonen,et al.  Intrauterine contraception after medical abortion: factors affecting success of early insertion. , 2017, Contraception.

[5]  O. Loeber,et al.  Contraceptive counselling for women with multiple unintended pregnancies: the abortion client’s perspective , 2017, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[6]  D. Huang,et al.  Why prevention of repeat abortion is so challenging: psychosocial characteristics of women at risk , 2017, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[7]  J. Liauw,et al.  Abortion training in Canadian obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. , 2016, Contraception.

[8]  M. Bismark,et al.  How do women seeking abortion choose between surgical and medical abortion? Perspectives from abortion service providers , 2016, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[9]  B. Winikoff,et al.  Acceptability and feasibility of 400 μg buccal misoprostol after 200 mg mifepristone for early medical abortion in Georgia , 2016, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[10]  R. Alexandre The Constitution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia , 2016 .

[11]  Angela Y. Chen,et al.  Medical Compared With Surgical Abortion for Effective Pregnancy Termination in the First Trimester , 2015, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  C. Fiala,et al.  Pain during medical abortion, the impact of the regimen: A neglected issue? A review , 2014, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[13]  B. Winikoff,et al.  Acceptability and feasibility of mifepristone medical abortion in the early first trimester in Azerbaijan , 2014, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[14]  B. Winikoff,et al.  Efficacy and acceptability of a mifepristone–misoprostol combined regimen for early induced abortion among women in Mexico City , 2014, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[15]  J. Steinauer,et al.  Availability and characteristics of abortion training in US ob-gyn residency programs: a national survey. , 2014, Contraception.

[16]  R. Brondeel,et al.  Pre-abortion counselling from women's point of view , 2013, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[17]  T. Shochet,et al.  Efficacy and acceptability of early mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion in Ukraine: Results of two clinical trials , 2013, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[18]  F. Kara,et al.  Early surgical abortion: Safe and effective , 2013, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[19]  C. Fiala,et al.  Assessment of significant factors affecting acceptability of home administration of misoprostol for medical abortion. , 2012, Contraception.

[20]  M. White,et al.  Client preferences and acceptability for medical abortion and MVA as early pregnancy termination method in Northwest Ethiopia , 2011, Reproductive health.

[21]  J. Trussell,et al.  Medical vs. surgical abortion: the importance of women's choice. , 2010, Contraception.

[22]  I. Leal,et al.  Abortion counselling according to healthcare providers: A qualitative study in the Lisbon metropolitan area, Portugal , 2010, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[23]  A. Templeton,et al.  Medical and surgical options for induced abortion in first trimester. , 2010, Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

[24]  O. Loeber Motivation and satisfaction with early medical vs. surgical abortion in the Netherlands , 2010, Reproductive health matters.

[25]  J. Steinauer,et al.  Abortion Training in Canadian Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  C. Fiala,et al.  Review of medical abortion using mifepristone in combination with a prostaglandin analogue. , 2006, Contraception.

[27]  B. Winikoff,et al.  Mifepristone medical abortion in Albania: Results from a pilot clinical research study , 2006, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[28]  G. Bártfai,et al.  Accessibility and availability of abortion in six European countries , 2005, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[29]  M. Berer Medical Abortion: Issues of Choice and Acceptability , 2005, Reproductive health matters.

[30]  L. Keder Best practices in surgical abortion. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[31]  B. Pinter Medico-legal aspects of abortion in Europe , 2002, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[32]  A. Templeton,et al.  Surgical abortion. , 2002, Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

[33]  J. Rademakers,et al.  Medical abortion as an alternative to vacuum aspiration: first experiences with the 'abortion pill' in The Netherlands , 2001, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[34]  P. Darney,et al.  Early surgical abortion: an alternative to and backup for medical abortion. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[35]  L. Beckman,et al.  Acceptability of suction curettage and mifepristone abortion in the United States: a prospective comparison study. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[36]  M. Paul,et al.  A clinician's guide to medical and surgical abortion , 1999 .

[37]  I. Sivin,et al.  Safety, efficacy, and acceptability of medical abortion in China, Cuba, and India: a comparative trial of mifepristone-misoprostol versus surgical abortion. , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[38]  E. Aubény Methods of abortion in Europe during the first trimester of pregnancy. , 1997, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[39]  D. Paintin Abortion in the first trimester. , 1992, BMJ.