Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data

Despite the central role of quantitative PCR (qPCR) in the quantification of mRNA transcripts, most analyses of qPCR data are still delegated to the software that comes with the qPCR apparatus. This is especially true for the handling of the fluorescence baseline. This article shows that baseline estimation errors are directly reflected in the observed PCR efficiency values and are thus propagated exponentially in the estimated starting concentrations as well as ‘fold-difference’ results. Because of the unknown origin and kinetics of the baseline fluorescence, the fluorescence values monitored in the initial cycles of the PCR reaction cannot be used to estimate a useful baseline value. An algorithm that estimates the baseline by reconstructing the log-linear phase downward from the early plateau phase of the PCR reaction was developed and shown to lead to very reproducible PCR efficiency values. PCR efficiency values were determined per sample by fitting a regression line to a subset of data points in the log-linear phase. The variability, as well as the bias, in qPCR results was significantly reduced when the mean of these PCR efficiencies per amplicon was used in the calculation of an estimate of the starting concentration per sample.

[1]  R. Rutledge,et al.  A kinetic-based sigmoidal model for the polymerase chain reaction and its application to high-capacity absolute quantitative real-time PCR , 2008, BMC biotechnology.

[2]  S. Swillens,et al.  Revisiting the sigmoidal curve fitting applied to quantitative real-time PCR data. , 2008, Analytical biochemistry.

[3]  Christian Ritz,et al.  Highly accurate sigmoidal fitting of real-time PCR data by introducing a parameter for asymmetry , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[4]  Tina Lucas,et al.  Simultaneous fitting of real-time PCR data with efficiency of amplification modeled as Gaussian function of target fluorescence , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[5]  Š. Čikoš,et al.  Relative quantification of mRNA: comparison of methods currently used for real-time PCR data analysis , 2007, BMC Molecular Biology.

[6]  Christian Mazza,et al.  Statistical significance of quantitative PCR , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[7]  Tania Nolan,et al.  Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[8]  Jan Terje Kvaløy,et al.  Error propagation in relative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction quantification models: the balance between accuracy and precision. , 2006, Analytical biochemistry.

[9]  Thomas Unger,et al.  Quantitative real-time RT-PCR data analysis: current concepts and the novel “gene expression’s CT difference” formula , 2006, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[10]  D. Rebrikov,et al.  Real-time PCR: A review of approaches to data analysis , 2006, Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology.

[11]  M. Pfaffl,et al.  Comparison of relative mRNA quantification models and the impact of RNA integrity in quantitative real-time RT-PCR , 2006, Biotechnology Letters.

[12]  E. J. Kontanis,et al.  Evaluation of Real‐Time PCR Amplification Efficiencies to Detect PCR Inhibitors , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[13]  Jana L Gevertz,et al.  Mathematical model of real-time PCR kinetics. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  Sheng Zhao,et al.  Comprehensive Algorithm for Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , 2005, J. Comput. Biol..

[15]  Michael W. Pfaffl,et al.  Improving quantitative real-time RT-PCR reproducibility by boosting primer-linked amplification efficiency , 2002, Biotechnology Letters.

[16]  Frank Vitzthum,et al.  Investigations on DNA intercalation and surface binding by SYBR Green I, its structure determination and methodological implications. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  R. Rutledge,et al.  Sigmoidal curve-fitting redefines quantitative real-time PCR with the prospective of developing automated high-throughput applications. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  M. Pfaffl,et al.  Standardized determination of real-time PCR efficiency from a single reaction set-up. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  Tzachi Bar,et al.  Kinetic Outlier Detection (KOD) in real-time PCR. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  Russell G Foster,et al.  Experimental validation of novel and conventional approaches to quantitative real-time PCR data analysis. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  A. Pingoud,et al.  Validation of an algorithm for automatic quantification of nucleic acid copy numbers by real-time polymerase chain reaction. , 2003, Analytical biochemistry.

[22]  A. Moorman,et al.  Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[23]  S A Bustin,et al.  Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. , 2002, Journal of molecular endocrinology.

[24]  Weihong Liu,et al.  Validation of a quantitative method for real time PCR kinetics. , 2002, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[25]  G. Horgan,et al.  Relative expression software tool (REST©) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR , 2002 .

[26]  N. Mcbrien,et al.  High-resolution semi-quantitative real-time PCR without the use of a standard curve. , 2001, BioTechniques.

[27]  M. Pfaffl,et al.  A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[28]  J Stevens,et al.  ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detection Systemを用いたInvaderアッセイによるSNP解析 , 2000 .

[29]  S. Walker,et al.  Quantitative RT-PCR : Pitfalls and Potential , 1999 .

[30]  G Stolovitzky,et al.  Efficiency of DNA replication in the polymerase chain reaction. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  J. Peccoud,et al.  Theoretical uncertainty of measurements using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. , 1996, Biophysical journal.