The Role of Visual Detail during Situated Memory Recall within a Virtual Reality Environment

Accurately eliciting long-term procedural knowledge continues to be a non-trivial challenge. In this project, we continued an exploration into a novel approach that provides users with virtual stimuli during the elicitation process. Specifically, users were placed into a virtual reality (VR) environment, representing a real-world location, and asked to role-play a familiar task while verbally describing each action they were simulating. This approach has previously shown promise when compared with context-devoid methods, but no research has yet considered whether the detail of the provided virtual stimuli may meaningfully affect recall performance. To explore this possibility, two virtual environments with identical spatial characteristics and object placement were developed. One of these environments had high visual detail while the other had minimal visual detail. An A/B lab-based study was then conducted, in which 30 participants were assigned to each of the two environments (N=60). The results of this study showed that, despite major visual differences between the two environments, both treatment groups described a similar amount of information. Practically, this suggests that even minimally detailed environments may be sufficient to provide appropriate context to users for effective memory recall in an elicitation setting.

[1]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Evaluating Display Fidelity and Interaction Fidelity in a Virtual Reality Game , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[2]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[3]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  Virtual memory palaces: immersion aids recall , 2018, Virtual Reality.

[4]  J. Caplan,et al.  Building a memory palace in minutes: equivalent memory performance using virtual versus conventional environments with the Method of Loci. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[5]  D. Sheskin The Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient , 2003 .

[6]  Natalia Juristo Juzgado,et al.  Effectiveness of Requirements Elicitation Techniques: Empirical Results Derived from a Systematic Review , 2006, 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'06).

[7]  Martijn J. Schuemie,et al.  Research on Presence in Virtual Reality: A Survey , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[8]  A. Carassa,et al.  A situated cognition perspective on presence , 2005 .

[9]  A. Berztiss,et al.  Requirements Engineering , 2002, J. Object Technol..

[10]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[11]  Daniel M. Johnson,et al.  Improved Memory Elicitation in Virtual Reality: New Experimental Results and Insights , 2017, INTERACT.

[12]  B. Clifford,et al.  A Field evaluation of training in three methods of witness/victim investigative interviewing , 1996 .

[13]  David Dunning,et al.  How unaware are the unskilled? Empirical tests of the “signal extraction” counterexplanation for the Dunning–Kruger effect in self-evaluation of performance , 2013 .

[14]  Mel Slater,et al.  A note on presence terminology , 2003 .

[15]  Mel Slater,et al.  Measuring Presence: A Response to the Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire , 1999, Presence.

[16]  Tua Haldin-Herrgård,et al.  Difficulties in diffusion of tacit knowledge in organizations , 2000 .

[17]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[18]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Elizabeth A. Smith The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[20]  Amitai Ziv,et al.  Patient safety and simulation-based medical education , 2000, Medical teacher.

[21]  Randy F. Pausch,et al.  A Literature Survey for Virtual Environments: Military Flight Simulator Visual Systems and Simulator Sickness , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[22]  Richard A Armstrong,et al.  When to use the Bonferroni correction , 2014, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[23]  Neff Walker,et al.  Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[24]  Daniel M. Johnson,et al.  Augmenting process elicitation with visual priming: An empirical exploration of user behaviour and modelling outcomes , 2016, Inf. Syst..

[25]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Initial Validation of a Virtual Environment for Assessment of Memory Functioning: Virtual Reality Cognitive Performance Assessment Test , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[26]  Jennifer L. Campos,et al.  Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[27]  Frank Maurer,et al.  Requirements engineering and agile software development , 2003, WET ICE 2003. Proceedings. Twelfth IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, 2003..

[28]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[29]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Sense of Embodiment in Virtual Reality , 2012, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.