Wind turbine noise: annoyance and alternative exposure indicators

Ecological awareness increases energy production by wind turbines, but the considerable associated annoyance risk requires carefully designed noise control strategies when they are to be installed in densely populated regions. Well-chosen operational restrictions may reduce noise annoyance while preserving cost-effectiveness. This research project investigates the relationship between the inhabitants’ wind turbine noise annoyance, exposure indicators, operational characteristics and environmental variables for a specific industrial site near a residential area. In contrast to most other research on wind turbine noise annoyance, in this study a six–month field experiment is conducted including regular on-line annoyance reports, continuous 1/3-octave band noise level registrations, periodic sound recordings, electricity production per minute and meteorological observations. Logistic regression reveals that the risk of high annoyance not only depends on the rotational speed, but also on the wind turbines’ nacelle position relative to the location of the dwellings, i.e. the wind direction. This directivity effect can be captured when noise parameters such as the background noise level caused by other sources and a so-called fluctuation-indicator are introduced. Background noise measurements incorporate wind induced vegetation and road traffic noise; their LA95-level is inversely related to the risk of high annoyance. The fluctuation-indicator is calculated from the 1/3–octave band spectra to capture the periodic part of wind turbine noise; here the risk of high annoyance increases with increasing fluctuation strength. These detailed findings can be used for designing operational restrictions that limit noise annoyance while keeping production as high as possible.

[1]  Stefan Oerlemans Detection of aeroacoustic sound sources on aircraft and wind turbines , 2009 .

[2]  E. Pedersen,et al.  The impact of visual factors on noise annoyance among people living in the vicinity of wind turbines , 2008 .

[3]  B. Hoen Assessing the Impacts of Reduced Noise Operations of Wind Turbines on Neighbor Annoyance: A Preliminary Analysis in Vinalhaven, Maine , 2010 .

[4]  Eja Pedersen,et al.  Wind turbines—low level noise sources interfering with restoration? , 2008 .

[5]  Serge Schmitz,et al.  Landscape Capacity and Social Attitude towards wind energy projects in Belgium , 2010 .

[6]  T. Hullar,et al.  Responses of the ear to low frequency sounds, infrasound and wind turbines , 2010, Hearing Research.

[7]  Eja Pedersen,et al.  Response to noise from modern wind farms in The Netherlands. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Frank E. Harrell,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2001 .

[9]  Sunil J Rao,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2003 .

[10]  Frits van den Berg,et al.  Can road traffic mask sound from wind turbines? Response to wind turbine sound at different levels of road traffic sound. , 2010 .

[11]  Evy Öhrström,et al.  PSYCHO-ACOUSTIC CHARACTERS OF RELEVANCE FOR ANNOYANCE OF WIND TURBINE NOISE , 2002 .

[12]  Shafiquzzaman Khan,et al.  The Potential of Natural Sounds to Mask Wind Turbine Noise , 2010 .

[13]  Frits van den Berg,et al.  Why is wind turbine noise poorly masked by road traffic noise , 2010 .