Songs of the city: noise-dependent spectral plasticity in the acoustic phenotype of urban birds

Urbanization leads to homogenization of avian communities through local extinction of rare bird species and increasing numbers of the same common urban bird species over large geographical areas. Successful city birds often persist through some sort of behavioural plasticity that helps them survive and reproduce close to humans, in built-up areas, with all the typical urban feasts and hazards. In this review, I address whether behavioural plasticity of the acoustic phenotype can be an additional factor in explaining which species end up as urban survivors. Anthropogenic noise has been shown to negatively affect avian distribution and reproduction, especially for species that rely on relatively low-frequency songs for mediating territorial conflicts and attracting partners for mating. Spectral differences between songs of city and forest populations of the same species and correlations between individual song frequency use and local noise levels suggest that many successful city species shift song frequency upward under noisy urban conditions. Experimental evidence has confirmed the ability of several species to show rapid spectral adjustments as well as perceptual benefits of singing at higher frequency in noisy habitats. However, empirical evidence of fitness benefits for birds showing the ability and tendency of noise-dependent spectral adjustment is still lacking. Furthermore, depending on the species and the underlying mechanism for spectral change, there may also be fitness costs through a compromise on signal function. These two aspects are only two of many remaining avenues for future studies. The acoustic phenotype of urban birds provides a great model system to study fundamental processes such as causes and consequences of environmentally induced signal changes, ‘cultural assimilation’, and the relationship between phenotypic and genotypic evolution. Furthermore, the current and expected rate of urbanization remains high at a global scale, which will lead to further spread in time and space of artificially elevated noise levels. This should guarantee the continued interest of scientists, politicians and conservationists for many years ahead.

[1]  William A. Searcy,et al.  Song as an aggressive signal in songbirds , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation , 2002 .

[3]  Hans Slabbekoorn,et al.  Habitat-dependent acoustic divergence affects playback response in urban and forest populations of the European blackbird , 2010 .

[4]  A. Sih Understanding variation in behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a conceptual overview , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Wouter Halfwerk,et al.  A behavioural mechanism explaining noise-dependent frequency use in urban birdsong , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  A. A. Ríos-Chelén,et al.  Strategies of song adaptation to urban noise in the house finch: syllable pitch plasticity or differential syllable use? , 2009 .

[7]  J. Krebs,et al.  SONG LEARNING IN ADULT GREAT TITS (PARUS MAJOR): EFFECTS OF NEIGHBOURS , 1989 .

[8]  Daniel T. Blumstein,et al.  Birdsong tuned to the environment: green hylia song varies with elevation, tree cover, and noise , 2009 .

[9]  Nathan J. Kleist,et al.  Noise pollution alters ecological services: enhanced pollination and disrupted seed dispersal , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Habitat-related birdsong divergence: a multi-level study on the influence of territory density and ambient noise in European blackbirds , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  Hansjoerg P. Kunc,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity affects the response of a sexually selected trait to anthropogenic noise , 2013 .

[12]  M. West-Eberhard Developmental plasticity and evolution , 2003 .

[13]  Erin M. Bayne,et al.  Chronic industrial noise affects pairing success and age structure of ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla , 2006 .

[14]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  HABITAT-DEPENDENT SONG DIVERGENCE IN THE LITTLE GREENBUL: AN ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SELECTION PRESSURES ON ACOUSTIC SIGNALS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  E. Snell-Rood,et al.  Selective processes in development: implications for the costs and benefits of phenotypic plasticity. , 2012, Integrative and comparative biology.

[16]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Birds and Anthropogenic Noise: Singing Higher May Matter , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[17]  Peter P. Marra,et al.  Comparative effects of urban development and anthropogenic noise on bird songs , 2012 .

[18]  Stewart H. Hulse,et al.  Auditory scene analysis in animal communication , 2002 .

[19]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Swamp sparrows modulate vocal performance in an aggressive context , 2009, Biology Letters.

[20]  J. Atwell,et al.  Boldness behavior and stress physiology in a novel urban environment suggest rapid correlated evolutionary adaptation. , 2012, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[21]  Gail L. Patricelli,et al.  AVIAN COMMUNICATION IN URBAN NOISE: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF VOCAL ADJUSTMENT , 2006 .

[22]  P. Slater,et al.  The maintenance of vocal learning by gene–culture interaction: the cultural trap hypothesis , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  S. Croci,et al.  Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: Analysis at different European latitudes , 2006 .

[24]  Francisco Romero,et al.  Tolerance to noise in 91 bird species from 27 urban gardens of Iberian Peninsula , 2012 .

[25]  Manfred Gahr,et al.  The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits , 2002 .

[26]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Bird densities are associated with household densities , 2007 .

[27]  Eugene S. Morton,et al.  On the learning of degraded and undegraded songs in the Carolina wren , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  H. Brumm The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird , 2004 .

[29]  Songbirds learn songs least degraded by environmental transmission , 2012, Biology Letters.

[30]  A. Popper,et al.  A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  D. Sol,et al.  Behavioural adjustments for a life in the city , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  W. Wcislo BEHAVIORAL ENVIRONMENTS AND EVOLUTIONARY CHANGE , 1989 .

[33]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Cities Change the Songs of Birds , 2006, Current Biology.

[34]  S. Frank,et al.  Natural selection. II. Developmental variability and evolutionary rate * , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[35]  Clinton D. Francis,et al.  Vocal frequency change reflects different responses to anthropogenic noise in two suboscine tyrant flycatchers , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Song and information about aggressive responses of blackbirds, Turdus merula: evidence from interactive playback experiments with territory owners , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  P. Monaghan,et al.  Roof nesting by gulls for better or worse? , 2008 .

[38]  K. Gaston,et al.  What makes an urban bird? , 2011 .

[39]  Kirsten M. Parris,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Effects of Roads and Traffic on Wildlife Populations and Landscape Function Impacts of Traffic Noise and Traffic Volume on Birds of Roadside Habitats , 2009 .

[40]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  The communicative significance of song frequency and song length in territorial chiffchaffs , 2012 .

[41]  W. E. Wood,et al.  SONG SPARROW (MELOSPIZA MELODIA) SONG VARIES WITH URBAN NOISE , 2006 .

[42]  P. Yeh,et al.  Reduced territorial responses in dark-eyed juncos following population establishment in a climatically mild environment , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  Christopher N. Templeton,et al.  Bird song learning in an eavesdropping context , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  Diego Gil,et al.  INCREASE IN SONG FREQUENCY IN RESPONSE TO URBAN NOISE IN THE GREAT TIT PARUS MAJO R AS SHOWN BY DATA FROM THE MADRID (SPAIN) CITY NOISE MAP , 2010 .

[45]  A. Horn,et al.  Ambient noise increases missed detections in nestling birds , 2012, Biology Letters.

[46]  E. Snell-Rood,et al.  An overview of the evolutionary causes and consequences of behavioural plasticity , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  J. Baldwin,et al.  Development and Evolution. , 1903 .

[48]  T. Dabelsteen An analysis of the full song of the blackbird turdus merula with respect to message coding and adaptations for acoustic communication , 1984 .

[49]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[50]  K. Wiebe,et al.  Brood parasites may use gape size constraints to exploit provisioning rules of smaller hosts: an experimental test of mechanisms of food allocation , 2012 .

[51]  R. Lande Adaptation to an extraordinary environment by evolution of phenotypic plasticity and genetic assimilation , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[52]  Wouter Halfwerk,et al.  Male great tit song perch selection in response to noise-dependent female feedback , 2012 .

[53]  Gonçalo C. Cardoso,et al.  Which birds adjust the frequency of vocalizations in urban noise? , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  Kevin R Crooks,et al.  The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[55]  F. Bonier Hormones in the city: Endocrine ecology of urban birds , 2012, Hormones and Behavior.

[56]  M. D. Beecher,et al.  Social influences during song development in the song sparrow: a laboratory experiment simulating field conditions , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[57]  M. West-Eberhard Phenotypic Plasticity and the Origins of Diversity , 1989 .

[58]  Terry Burke,et al.  Passerine Birds Breeding under Chronic Noise Experience Reduced Fitness , 2012, PloS one.

[59]  John J. Walsh,et al.  Urban effects on native avifauna: a review , 2006 .

[60]  Wouter Halfwerk,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: Noise Annoys at Community Level , 2009, Current Biology.

[61]  S. Kark,et al.  Living in the city: can anyone become an ‘urban exploiter'? , 2007 .

[62]  Alejandro Gonzalez-Voyer,et al.  Brains and the city: big-brained passerine birds succeed in urban environments , 2011, Biology Letters.

[63]  Sarah L. Dumyahn,et al.  What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[64]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Effects of Roads on Animal Abundance: an Empirical Review and Synthesis , 2009 .

[65]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Habitat‐dependent song divergence at subspecies level in the grey‐breasted wood‐wren , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[66]  G. Cardoso,et al.  Paradoxical calls: the opposite signaling role of sound frequency across bird species , 2012 .

[67]  J. Evans,et al.  Behavioural Syndromes in Urban and Rural Populations of Song Sparrows , 2010 .

[68]  Ulrike Langemann,et al.  Great tits in urban noise benefit from high frequencies in song detection and discrimination , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[69]  E. Morton Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[70]  Melissa Hughes,et al.  Behavioral Syndromes Break Down in Urban Song Sparrow Populations , 2011 .

[71]  Jessica L. Blickley,et al.  Experimental Evidence for the Effects of Chronic Anthropogenic Noise on Abundance of Greater Sage‐Grouse at Leks , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[72]  Poul Hansen Vocal learning: its role in adapting sound structures to long-distance propagation, and a hypothesis on its evolution , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[73]  Philippe Clergeau,et al.  Does Urbanization Filter Birds on the Basis of Their Biological Traits , 2008 .

[74]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  The signal value of matched singing in great tits: evidence from interactive playback experiments , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[75]  F. Jiguet,et al.  Functional Homogenization Effect of Urbanization on Bird Communities , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[76]  N. McIntyre,et al.  From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[77]  P. Yeh,et al.  SOUND TRANSMISSION AND SONG DIVERGENCE: A COMPARISON OF URBAN AND FOREST ACOUSTICS , 2007 .

[78]  S. Peris,et al.  Bird song variations along an urban gradient: The case of the European blackbird (Turdus merula) , 2011 .

[79]  Hansjoerg P. Kunc,et al.  Behavioral Plasticity Allows Short‐Term Adjustment to a Novel Environment , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[80]  H. Brumm,et al.  Blackbirds sing higher-pitched songs in cities: adaptation to habitat acoustics or side-effect of urbanization? , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[81]  S. Hurlbert Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[82]  Sue Anne Zollinger,et al.  Effect Sizes and the Integrative Understanding of Urban Bird Song , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[83]  J. Krebs,et al.  Song Types in a Population of Great Tits (Parus Major): Their Distribution, Abundance and Acquisition By Individuals , 1982 .

[84]  Paul R. Martin,et al.  Urban birds have broader environmental tolerance , 2007, Biology Letters.

[85]  Wouter Halfwerk,et al.  Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success , 2011 .

[86]  D. Wilson,et al.  Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[87]  P. Slater,et al.  Changes with Time in the Songs of a Population of Chaffinches , 1980 .

[88]  Hans Slabbekoorn,et al.  Soundscape orientation: a new field in need of sound investigation , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[89]  A. A. Ríos-Chelén,et al.  The learning advantage: bird species that learn their song show a tighter adjustment of song to noisy environments than those that do not learn , 2012, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[90]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Repertoire size and composition in great tits: a flexibility test using playbacks , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[91]  F. Rheindt The impact of roads on birds: Does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution? , 2003 .

[92]  Andrew P. Hendry,et al.  Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology , 2003 .

[93]  C. ten Cate,et al.  Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[94]  Eliot A. Brenowitz,et al.  The Role of Body Size, Phylogeny, and Ambient Noise in the Evolution of Bird Song , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[95]  David N. Reznick,et al.  Adaptive versus non‐adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments , 2007 .

[96]  R. Francis,et al.  What makes a species synurbic , 2012 .

[97]  A. Hendry,et al.  The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in response to anthropogenic disturbance , 2010 .

[98]  Sarah E. Goodwin,et al.  Effects of Traffic Noise on Occupancy Patterns of Forest Birds , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[99]  David R. Wilson,et al.  Anthropogenic noise affects song structure in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[100]  P. Marler,et al.  Developmental overproduction and selective attrition: new processes in the epigenesis of birdsong. , 1982, Developmental psychobiology.

[101]  R. Mulder,et al.  Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and syllable rate of songs and calls in silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis) , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[102]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization , 2006 .

[103]  David A. Luther,et al.  Urban noise and the cultural evolution of bird songs , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[104]  H. Brumm,et al.  Birds and Anthropogenic Noise: Are Urban Songs Adaptive? , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[105]  R. Foppen,et al.  Impact of road traffic on breeding bird populations , 2006 .

[106]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Ecological implications of behavioural syndromes. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[107]  Daniel Sol,et al.  Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[108]  Alejandro A. Ríos-Chelén,et al.  Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird , 2011, Biology Letters.

[109]  Elizabeth P. Derryberry,et al.  Birdsongs keep pace with city life: changes in song over time in an urban songbird affects communication , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[110]  L. Lefebvre,et al.  Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[111]  Clinton D. Francis,et al.  Noise Pollution Filters Bird Communities Based on Vocal Frequency , 2011, PloS one.

[112]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Immediate spectral flexibility in singing chiffchaffs during experimental exposure to highway noise , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[113]  Ulrike Langemann,et al.  Effects of signal features and environmental noise on signal detection in the great tit, Parus major , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[114]  F. Rheindt The impact of roads on birds: Does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution? , 2003, Journal für Ornithologie.

[115]  J. Belant Gulls in urban environments: landscape-level management to reduce conflict , 1997 .

[116]  Gonçalo C. Cardoso,et al.  Are bird species that vocalize at higher frequencies preadapted to inhabit noisy urban areas , 2009 .

[117]  Bremond Jean-Claude,et al.  Acoustic Competition Between the Song of the Wren (Troglodytes Troglodytes) and the Songs of Other Species , 1978 .

[118]  J. E. Arévalo,et al.  Traffic noise affects forest bird species in a protected tropical forest. , 2010, Revista de biologia tropical.

[119]  Carl Smith,et al.  An analysis of landscape penetration by road infrastructure and traffic noise , 2012, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[120]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Fluid dynamics: Vortex rings in a constant electric field , 2003, Nature.

[121]  Caitlin R. Kight,et al.  How and why environmental noise impacts animals: an integrative, mechanistic review. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[122]  P. Slater,et al.  Ambient noise, motor fatigue, and serial redundancy in chaffinch song , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[123]  J. Marzluff Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds , 2001 .

[124]  Anders Pape Møller,et al.  Successful city dwellers: a comparative study of the ecological characteristics of urban birds in the Western Palearctic , 2009, Oecologia.

[125]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Birdsong and male—male competition: Causes and consequences of vocal variability in the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto) , 2002 .

[126]  Michael W. Strohbach,et al.  Birds and the City: Urban Biodiversity, Land Use, and Socioeconomics , 2009 .

[127]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Microgeographic song variation in island populations of the white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys nutalli): innovation through recombination , 2003 .

[128]  Ruud Foppen,et al.  The Effects of Car Traffic on Breeding Bird Populations in Woodland. I. Evidence of Reduced Habitat Quality for Willow Warblers (Phylloscopus trochilus) Breeding Close to a Highway , 1994 .

[129]  Stan Boutin,et al.  Impacts of Chronic Anthropogenic Noise from Energy‐Sector Activity on Abundance of Songbirds in the Boreal Forest , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[130]  T. Mitchell Aide,et al.  Impacts of traffic noise on anuran and bird communities , 2011, Urban Ecosystems.

[131]  Y. Mori,et al.  Urban noise and male density affect songs in the great tit Parus major , 2011 .

[132]  P. Laiolo The Rufous-Collared Sparrow Zonotrichia capensis utters higher frequency songs in urban habitats , 2011 .

[133]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[134]  Donald E. Kroodsma,et al.  Suggested experimental designs for song playbacks , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[135]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .

[136]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Do Blackbirds Signal Motivation to Fight with Their Song , 2007 .

[137]  B. W. Robinson,et al.  The influence of phenotypic modifications on evolution: the Baldwin effect and modern perspectives , 1999 .

[138]  Clinton D. Francis,et al.  Noise Pollution Changes Avian Communities and Species Interactions , 2009, Current Biology.

[139]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Bird song, ecology and speciation. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[140]  L. Baptista Geographic Variation in Song and Dialects of the Puget Sound White-Crowned Sparrow , 1977 .

[141]  K. Aoki A Sexual-Selection Model for the Evolution of Imitative Learning of Song in Polygynous Birds , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[142]  H. B. Fokidis,et al.  Brain Arginine Vasotocin Immunoreactivity Differs between Urban and Desert Curve-Billed Thrashers, Toxostoma curvirostre: Relationships with Territoriality and Stress Physiology , 2011, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[143]  J. G. Burns,et al.  Behavioural plasticity: an interaction between evolution and experience , 2010, Evolutionary Ecology.

[144]  A. Møller Interspecific variation in fear responses predicts urbanization in birds , 2010 .

[145]  Emily J Mockford,et al.  Effects of urban noise on song and response behaviour in great tits , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[146]  Franz Goller,et al.  On the relationship between, and measurement of, amplitude and frequency in birdsong , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[147]  T. Dabelsteen,et al.  BEING INSIDE NEST BOXES: DOES IT COMPLICATE THE RECEIVING CONDITIONS FOR GREAT TIT PARUS MAJOR FEMALES? , 2004 .

[148]  Fernando Nottebohm,et al.  The Origins of Vocal Learning , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[149]  H. Brumm,et al.  The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research , 2011 .

[150]  R. B. Payne Ecological Consequences of Song Matching: Breeding Success and Intraspecific Song Mimicry in Indigo Buntings , 1982 .

[151]  R. Dooling,et al.  Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: estimating the active space of a signal , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[152]  P. Warren,et al.  Urban bioacoustics: it's not just noise , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[153]  D. Irwin,et al.  The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[154]  S. Faeth,et al.  Trophic Dynamics in Urban Communities , 2005 .

[155]  Jessica L. Blickley,et al.  Chapter 1: Introduction: Research and perspectives on the study of anthropogenic noise and birds , 2012 .

[156]  Benjamin N. Taft,et al.  Bird Song: The Interface of Evolution and Mechanism , 2004 .

[157]  J. Atwell,et al.  On the relation between loudness and the increased song frequency of urban birds , 2011, Animal Behaviour.