An adaptive approach to selecting a flow‐partition exponent for a multiple‐flow‐direction algorithm

Most multiple‐flow‐direction algorithms (MFDs) use a flow‐partition coefficient (exponent) to determine the fractions draining to all downslope neighbours. The commonly used MFD often employs a fixed exponent over an entire watershed. The fixed coefficient strategy cannot effectively model the impact of local terrain conditions on the dispersion of local flow. This paper addresses this problem based on the idea that dispersion of local flow varies over space due to the spatial variation of local terrain conditions. Thus, the flow‐partition exponent of an MFD should also vary over space. We present an adaptive approach for determining the flow‐partition exponent based on local topographic attribute which controls local flow partitioning. In our approach, the influence of local terrain on flow partition is modelled by a flow‐partition function which is based on local maximum downslope gradient (we refer to this approach as MFD based on maximum downslope gradient, MFD‐md for short). With this new approach, a steep terrain which induces a convergent flow condition can be modelled using a large value for the flow‐partition exponent. Similarly, a gentle terrain can be modelled using a small value for the flow‐partition exponent. MFD‐md is quantitatively evaluated using four types of mathematical surfaces and their theoretical ‘true’ value of Specific Catchment Area (SCA). The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) shows that the error of SCA computed by MFD‐md is lower than that of SCA computed by the widely used SFD and MFD algorithms. Application of the new approach using a real DEM of a watershed in Northeast China shows that the flow accumulation computed by MFD‐md is better adapted to terrain conditions based on visual judgement.

[1]  L. Martz,et al.  The treatment of flat areas and depressions in automated drainage analysis of raster digital elevation models , 1998 .

[2]  Qiming Zhou,et al.  THEORETICAL ESTIMATION OF FLOW ACCUMULATION FROM A GRID-BASED DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL ∗ , 1997 .

[3]  H. Johnson,et al.  A comparison of 'traditional' and multimedia information systems development practices , 2003, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[4]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  Terrain attributes: estimation methods and scale effects , 1993 .

[5]  Xuejun Liu,et al.  Error assessment of grid-based flow routing algorithms used in hydrological models , 2002, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  On the definition of the flow width for calculating specific catchment area patterns from gridded elevation data , 2005 .

[7]  K. Beven,et al.  The in(a/tan/β) index:how to calculate it and how to use it within the topmodel framework , 1995 .

[8]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[9]  Sanghyun Kim,et al.  A digital elevation analysis: a spatially distributed flow apportioning algorithm , 2004 .

[10]  P. Holmgren Multiple flow direction algorithms for runoff modelling in grid based elevation models: An empirical evaluation , 1994 .

[11]  L. Blair A prediction. , 1995, Hospitals & health networks.

[12]  J. Fairfield,et al.  Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models , 1991 .

[13]  T. G. Freeman,et al.  Calculating catchment area with divergent flow based on a regular grid , 1991 .

[14]  M. Costa-Cabral,et al.  Digital Elevation Model Networks (DEMON): A model of flow over hillslopes for computation of contributing and dispersal areas , 1994 .

[15]  L. Martz,et al.  CATCH: a FORTRAN program for measuring catchment area from digital elevation models , 1988 .

[16]  Michael J. Sale,et al.  A comparison of geographical information systems-based algorithms for computing the TOPMODEL topographic index , 2004 .

[17]  S. K. Jenson,et al.  Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information-system analysis , 1988 .

[18]  E. O'Loughlin Prediction of Surface Saturation Zones in Natural Catchments by Topographic Analysis , 1986 .

[19]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[20]  Kong Fan New method for treating flat areas and closed depressions in the digital elevation models , 2003 .

[21]  Nicholas J. Lea,et al.  An Aspect-Driven Kinematic Routing Algorithm , 1992 .

[22]  Lars Harrie,et al.  Estimating Flow Distribution over Digital Elevation Models Using a Form-Based Algorithm , 1998, Ann. GIS.

[23]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: An evaluation of different terrain indices , 2004 .

[24]  K. N. Hjerdt,et al.  A new topographic index to quantify downslope controls on local drainage , 2004 .

[25]  D. Tarboton A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models , 1997 .

[26]  I. Moore,et al.  Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications , 1991 .

[27]  K. Beven,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF HILLSLOPE FLOW PATHS FOR DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING USING DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS , 1991 .

[28]  Gregory J. McCabe,et al.  Comparison of Single and Multiple Flow Direction Algorithms for Computing Topographic Parameters in TOPMODEL , 1995 .