Scientists as Writers

This study attempted to establish an image of a science writer based on a syn- thesis of writing theory, models, and research literature on academic writing in science and other disciplines and to contrast this image with an actual prototypical image of scientists as writers of science. The synthesis was used to develop a questionnaire to assess scientists' writing habits, beliefs, strategies, and perceptions about print-based language. The ques- tionnaire was administered to 17 scientists from science and applied science departments of a large Midwestern land grant university. Each respondent was interviewed following the completion of the questionnaire with a custom-designed semistructured protocol to elab- orate, probe, and extend their written responses. These data were analyzed in a stepwise fashion using the questionnaire responses to establish tentative assertions about the three major foci (type of writing done, criteria of good science writing, writing strategies used) and the interview responses to verify these assertions. Two illustrative cases (a very expe- rienced, male physical scientist and a less experienced, female applied biological scientist) were used to highlight diversity in the sample. Generally, these 17 scientists are driven by the academy's priority of publishing their research results in refereed, peer-reviewed journals. They write their research reports in isolation or as a member of a large research team, target their writing to a few journals that they also read regularly, use writing in their teaching and scholarship to inform and persuade science students and other scientists, but do little border crossing into other discourse communities. The prototypical science writer found in this study did not match the image based on a synthesis of the writing literature in that these scientists perceived writing as knowledge telling not knowledge building, their metacognition of written discourse was tacit, and they used a narrow array of genre, strate- gies, target audiences, and expectations for their writing. C

[1]  William F. McComas,et al.  THE PRINCIPAL ELEMENTS OF THE NATURE OF SCIENCE: DISPELLING THE MYTHS , 1998 .

[2]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  The computer and the mind - An introduction to cognitive science [Book Review] , 1989, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  P. Pintrich,et al.  The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning , 1997 .

[4]  Carolyn W. Keys.  Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science , 1999 .

[5]  J. Kelly.  Science for All Americans (A Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology) American Association for the Advancement of Science , 1990 .

[6]  Martin Nystrand,et al.  The Structure of Written Communication: Studies in Reciprocity between Writers and Readers , 1986 .

[7]  Gert Rijlaarsdam,et al.  Effective strategies for the teaching and learning of writing , 1999 .

[8]  Linda Best,et al.  A Critique of Cognitive Research on Writing from Three Critical Perspectives: Theoretical, Methodological, and Practical. , 1995 .

[9]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Writing for learning in secondary science: Rethinking practices , 1996 .

[10]  C. Sinding.  Literary Genres and the Construction of Knowledge in Biology: Semantic Shifts and Scientific Change , 1996 .

[11]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  The reading–science learning–writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises , 1994 .

[12]  Michel Ferrari,et al.  What makes a good writer? Differences in good and poor writers' self-regulation of writing , 1998 .

[13]  Barry J. Zimmerman,et al.  Becoming a Self-Regulated Writer: A Social Cognitive Perspective , 1997 .

[14]  Paul Dehart Hurd,et al.  Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world , 1998 .

[15]  J. Hayes,et al.  Writing Research and the Writer. , 1986 .

[16]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy , 1999 .

[17]  Jeanne Fahnestock,et al.  Accommodating Science , 1986 .

[18]  L. Yore.  Enhancing Science Literacy for All Students With Embedded Reading Instruction and Writing-to-Learn Activities. , 2000, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[19]  John H. Holland,et al.  Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[20]  Patricia M. Rowell.  Learning in School Science: The Promises and Practices of Writing. , 1997 .

[21]  Dorothea K. Thompson.  Arguing for Experimental “Facts” in Science , 1993 .

[22]  R. Hackett.  Young People's Images of Science , 1996 .

[23]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[24]  G. Schumacher,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Knowledge Change Due to Writing , 1991, Research in the Teaching of English.

[25]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Students' Perceptions of Writing for Learning in Secondary School Science. , 1999 .

[26]  Perry D. Klein.  Reopening Inquiry into Cognitive Processes in Writing-To-Learn , 1999 .

[27]  D. Kuhn.  Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking , 1993 .

[28]  P. Chinn,et al.  From Corrector to Collaborator: The Range of Instructor Roles in Writing-Based Natural and Applied Science Classes. , 2000 .

[29]  A. Collins.  National Science Education Standards: A Political Document. , 1998 .

[30]  Randy Moore,et al.  Does Writing about Science Improve Learning about Science. , 1993 .

[31]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Writing-to-Learn Science: Breakthroughs, Barriers, and Promises. , 1999 .

[32]  John L. Koprowski.  Sharpening the Craft of Scientific Writing. , 1997 .

[33]  Christopher Norris,et al.  Against Relativism: Philosophy of Science, Deconstruction, and Critical Theory , 1997 .

[34]  Daria O. Carle,et al.  Facilitating Research between the Library and the Science Writing Classroom. , 1998 .

[35]  T. Leon Venable.  Errors as Teaching Tools--The Mass Media Mistake. , 1998 .

[36]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[37]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Literacy in Science: Learning to Handle Text as Technology , 2003 .

[38]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Sequential Writing Tasks’ Influence on Science Learning , 2001 .

[39]  L. Flower.  The Construction of Negotiated Meaning: A Social Cognitive Theory of Writing , 1994 .

[40]  D. Kuhn.  THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.

[41]  C. Sutton,et al.  Words, Science and Learning , 1992 .

[42]  D. Galbraith.  Conditions for discovery through writing , 1992 .

[43]  Gregory J. Kelly,et al.  The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse , 1999 .