In-situ insulator surface charge measurements in dielectric bridged vacuum gaps using an electrostatic probe

Surface charge measurements on alumina and polymer insulators were carried out after stressing them with DC voltages in a high vacuum. The order of magnitude of surface charge density was found to be the same for materials with supposedly widely varying secondary-emission yields. Surface coatings on alumina insulators reduced charge accumulation because of increased surface conductivity and/or reduced secondary-emission yield, which led to significant improvement in voltage hold-off for alumina ceramics. Removing the cathode triple junction from the main body of the cylindrical insulator, reducing the X-ray activity in the gap, or relieving the stress at the critical junction did not significantly alter the surface charge characteristics of cylindrical insulators. Wet hydrogen firing of plain alumina reduced the voltage hold-off by 25% without altering the surface charge density. It is postulated that the charging of insulators in bridged vacuum gaps with DC stresses is due to internal secondary emission produced by ionization of the lattice in the surface layer of the insulating material, by primary electrons injected at the cathode triple junction. This mechanism of charge production differs from the current models where charging is believed to occur due to electrons hopping along the surface/vacuum interface. >

[1]  W. A. Zisman,et al.  A NEW METHOD OF MEASURING CONTACT POTENTIAL DIFFERENCES IN METALS , 1932 .

[2]  P. Anderson.  The Contact Difference of Potential Between Tungsten and Barium. The External Work Function of Barium , 1935 .

[3]  W. M. Hoskins,et al.  A Modified Zisman Apparatus for Measuring Contact Potential Differences in Air , 1945 .

[4]  H. Jacobs,et al.  THE MECHANISM OF FIELD DEPENDENT SECONDARY EMISSION , 1952 .

[5]  D. K. Davies.  Trapped Charges on Dielectrics , 1964, Nature.

[6]  D. K. Davies,et al.  The examination of the electrical properties of insulators by surface charge measurement , 1967 .

[7]  K. Keiji Kanazawa,et al.  Discharge Characteristics of Photoconducting Insulators , 1970 .

[8]  P E Secker,et al.  A two-dimensional charge scanning instrument for flat insulating sheet , 1971 .

[9]  D. W. Vance.  Surface Charging of Insulators by Ion Irradiation , 1971 .

[10]  K. Srivastava,et al.  Experimental Observation of Surface Charging of High-Voltage Insulators for Vacuum Apparatus , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation.

[11]  D. Jensen,et al.  Electron avalanche and surface charging on alumina insulators during pulsed high‐voltage stress , 1974 .

[12]  Thomas H. DiStefano,et al.  Impact ionization model for dielectric instability and breakdown , 1974 .

[13]  D. M. Hanson,et al.  Spectroscopic measurement of the space‐charge distribution in insulators, semiconductors, and photoconductors , 1974 .

[14]  P. E. Secker,et al.  The desing of simple instruments for measurement of charge on insulating surfaces , 1975 .

[15]  R. E. Collins,et al.  Analysis of spatial distribution of charges and dipoles in electrets by a transient heating technique , 1976 .

[16]  N. Klein,et al.  Current runaway in insulators affected by impact ionization and recombination , 1976 .

[17]  R. Anderson,et al.  Insulator surface charging during fast pulsed surface flashover in vacuum , 1977 .

[18]  Gérard Dreyfus,et al.  New Principle for the Determination of Potential Distributions in Dielectrics , 1977 .

[19]  J. Robinson,et al.  Electric Fields and Secondary Emission near a Dielectric-Metal Interface , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation.

[20]  Chathan M. Cooke,et al.  Bulk charging of epoxy insulation under DC stress , 1980, 1980 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Insulation.

[21]  Y. Inuishi.  High Field Conduction and Breakdown in Solid Dielectrics , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation.

[22]  E. A. Flinn,et al.  An experimental assessment of proposed universal yield curves for secondary electron emission , 1980 .

[23]  J. P. Brainard,et al.  Mechanism of pulsed surface flashover involving electron‐stimulated desorption , 1980 .

[24]  J. D. Thompson,et al.  A nondestructive acoustic electric field probe , 1980 .

[25]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Contact-injected space charge in pet , 1981 .

[26]  E. Yadlowsky,et al.  Effect of Material Parameters on the Charging Characteristics of Irradiated Dielectrics , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[27]  Use of laser‐generated acoustic pulses to measure the electric field inside a solid dielectric , 1982 .

[28]  C. W. Gabel,et al.  Picosecond electro‐optic sampling system , 1982 .

[29]  Reimund Gerhard-Multhaupt,et al.  Analysis of pressure-wave methods for the nondestructive determination of spatial charge or field distributions in dielectrics , 1983 .

[30]  S. R. Kurtz,et al.  Direct observation of field-injected space charge in a metal-insulator-metal structure , 1984 .

[31]  R. Dougal,et al.  Role of surface charging in the breakdown of forty-five degree insulators subjected to high voltage nanosecond excitation , 1984, 1984 IEEE International Conference on Eletrical Insulation.

[32]  T. Maeno,et al.  Pulsed electro-acoustic measurement of volume charge accumulation and decay in polyethylene , 1986, Conference on Electrical Insulation & Dielectric Phenomena — Annual Report 1986.

[33]  A. Pedersen,et al.  ON THE ELECTROSTATICS OF PROBE MEASUREMENTS OF SURFACE CHARGE DENSITIES , 1987 .