Linewidth variation characterization by spatial decomposition

Characterization of linewidth variation by a three-step methodology is presented. Via electrical linewidth measurement, sources of linewidth variation with distinct spatial signatures are first isolated by spatial analysis. Causes with similar spatial signatures are then separated by contributor-specific measurements. Unanticipated components are lastly identified by examination of the residuals from spatial analysis. Significant sources include photomask error, flare, aberrations, development nonuniformity, and scan direction asymmetry. These components are then synthesized to quantify the contributions from the three modules of the patterning process: photomask, exposure system, and postexposure processing. Although these modules are independent of one another, their effects on linewidth variation may be correlated. Moreover, the contributions of the modules are found to vary with exposure tool, development track, and lithography strategy. The most effective means to reducing the overall linewidth variation depends on the relative importance between these components. Optical proximity correction is efficacious only for a well-controlled process where proximity effect is the predominant cause of linewidth variation.

[1]  Akio Misaka,et al.  A statistical gate CD control including OPC , 1998, 1998 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.98CH36216).

[2]  Lars W. Liebmann,et al.  Application of an aerial image measurement system to mask fabrication and analysis , 1994, Photomask Technology.

[3]  M. Buehler,et al.  The split-cross-bridge resistor for measuring the sheet resistance, linewidth, and line spacing of conducting layers , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[4]  Alfred Kwok-Kit Wong,et al.  Resolution enhancement techniques in optical lithography , 2001 .

[5]  V. Mahajan.  Zernike circle polynomials and optical aberrations of systems with circular pupils. , 1994, Applied optics.

[6]  John D. Zimmerman,et al.  Linewidth uniformity error analysis for step-and-scan systems , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Richard A. Allen,et al.  Extending electrical measurements to the 0.5 μm regime , 1991, Other Conferences.

[8]  Jan B. van Schoot,et al.  0.7-NA DUV step-and-scan system for 150-nm imaging with improved overlay , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Michael Arnz,et al.  Toward a comprehensive control of full-field image quality in optical photolithography , 1997, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Il-Jung Kim,et al.  Analytical approach to breakdown voltages in thin-film SOI power MOSFETs , 1996 .

[11]  Alan E. Rosenbluth,et al.  Condenser Aberrations In Kohler Illumination , 1988, Advanced Lithography.

[12]  P KirkJ.  Scattered light in photolithographic lenses. , 1994 .

[13]  Timothy A. Brunner,et al.  Impact of lens aberrations on optical lithography , 1997, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[14]  Lars W. Liebmann,et al.  Lithographic effects of mask critical dimension error , 1998, Advanced Lithography.

[15]  Alfred K. K. Wong,et al.  The mask error factor in optical lithography , 2000 .

[16]  Sören Berg,et al.  Microloading effect in reactive ion etching , 1994 .

[17]  Christopher J. Progler,et al.  Optical lens specifications from the user's perspective , 1998, Advanced Lithography.

[18]  Takeo Hashimoto,et al.  Effect of stage synchronization error of KrF scan on 0.18-μm patterning , 1998, Advanced Lithography.

[19]  Roger Fabian W. Pease,et al.  High-throughput high-density mapping and spectrum analysis of transistor gate length variations in SRAM circuits , 2001 .

[20]  Alan C. Thomas,et al.  Level-specific lithography optimization for 1-Gb DRAM , 2000 .

[21]  Joseph P. Kirk,et al.  Application of blazed gratings for determination of equivalent primary azimuthal aberrations , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[22]  Christophe Pierrat,et al.  Exposure characteristics of alternate aperture phase‐shifting masks fabricated using a subtractive process , 1992 .

[23]  Timothy A. Brunner,et al.  Characterization of linewidth variation , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[24]  R. Allen,et al.  A new test structure for the electrical measurement of the width of short features with arbitrarily wide voltage taps , 1992, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[25]  Gordon E. Moore,et al.  Lithography and the future of Moore's law , 1995, Advanced Lithography.

[26]  Koichi Matsumoto,et al.  New projection optical system for beyond 150-nm patterning with KrF and ArF sources , 1998, Advanced Lithography.

[27]  Peter Vanoppen,et al.  Analysis of full-wafer/full-batch CD uniformity using electrical linewidth measurements , 2001, Microelectronic and MEMS Technologies.

[28]  Yan Borodovsky.  Impact of local partial coherence variations on exposure tool performance , 1995, Advanced Lithography.

[29]  David M. Williamson,et al.  Micrascan III: 0.25-um resolution step-and-scan system , 1996, Advanced Lithography.

[30]  Y.S. Hwang,et al.  Highly manufacturable 4 Gb DRAM using using 0.11 /spl mu/m DRAM technology , 2000, International Electron Devices Meeting 2000. Technical Digest. IEDM (Cat. No.00CH37138).

[31]  Tsuneo Terasawa,et al.  Effect of condenser tilt on projection images produced by a phase-shifting mask , 1992, Advanced Lithography.

[32]  P. M. Hall,et al.  Resistance calculations for thin film patterns , 1968 .

[33]  Nobuyoshi Deguchi,et al.  150-nm generation lithography equipment , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[34]  Alfred K. K. Wong,et al.  Optical Proximity Correction , 2001 .

[35]  Lars W. Liebmann,et al.  Understanding across-chip line-width variation: the first step toward optical proximity correction , 1997, Advanced Lithography.

[36]  Joseph P. Kirk.  Scattered light in photolithographic lenses , 1994, Advanced Lithography.