PrEP implementation by local health departments in US cities and counties: Findings from a 2015 assessment of local health departments

Objective The United States Public Health Service released clinical practice guidelines for daily oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in May 2014. Local health departments (LHDs) are expected to play a critical role in PrEP implementation. We surveyed LHDs to assess awareness of and interest in supporting PrEP implementation, what roles they were taking, or believed they should take, in supporting PrEP, and what resources would be required to do so. Methods LHDs were surveyed in 2015 to assess their engagement in PrEP implementation (n = 500). The study employed a cross-sectional survey design with a randomly selected stratified sample. Results Among responding LHDs (n = 284), 109 (29%, weighted proportion) reported engagement in PrEP implementation. LHDs serving large jurisdictions (population 500,000+) and located in the West were more likely to be engaged in PrEP implementation. Making referrals for PrEP (74%) and conducting education and outreach to community members (51%) were the activities most frequently reported by LHDs engaged in PrEP implementation; 45% anticipated expanding their level of engagement. Among LHDs not engaged in PrEP implementation, 13% expected to become engaged over the next four years, 46% were undecided, and 41% reported it was unlikely. Information about PrEP for health care providers and information about PrEP for health department staff were the most frequently reported resource needs for LHDs engaged and not engaged in PrEP implementation, respectively. Conclusions PrEP implementation by LHDs was limited in 2015, three years after Food and Drug Administration approval and one year after the U.S. Public Health Service issued clinical practice guidelines. PrEP is a recently available intervention that is requiring LHDs to adjust existing HIV prevention efforts and service delivery models. Additional resources and implementation research is needed to effectively support PrEP scale-up by LHDs. Efforts must also be undertaken to increase PrEP awareness, knowledge, and implementation capacity among LHDs.

[1]  R. Gandhi Preexposure Prophylaxis for the Prevention of HIV , 2018 .

[2]  D. Smith,et al.  What Community-Based HIV Prevention Organizations Say About Their Role in Biomedical HIV Prevention. , 2016, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[3]  A. Greenberg,et al.  Willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among community-recruited, older people who inject drugs in Washington, DC. , 2016, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[4]  J. Stryker,et al.  PrEP Awareness and Attitudes in a National Survey of Primary Care Clinicians in the United States, 2009–2015 , 2016, PloS one.

[5]  P. Polgreen,et al.  Diffusion of Newer HIV Prevention Innovations: Variable Practices of Frontline Infectious Diseases Physicians. , 2016, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[6]  Daniel O'Connell,et al.  Vital Signs: Increased Medicaid Prescriptions for Preexposure Prophylaxis Against HIV infection--New York, 2012-2015. , 2015, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[7]  R. Wolitski,et al.  Vital Signs: Estimated Percentages and Numbers of Adults with Indications for Preexposure Prophylaxis to Prevent HIV Acquisition--United States, 2015. , 2015, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[8]  David R. Holtgrave,et al.  Generating hypotheses to explain declining HIV infection in four U.S. jurisdictions. , 2015, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[9]  J. Auerbach,et al.  Knowledge, attitudes, and likelihood of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among US women at risk of acquiring HIV. , 2015, AIDS patient care and STDs.

[10]  K. Green Integrating Biomedical Prevention Technologies: HIV/AIDS Focused CBOs Finding Their Way , 2015 .