What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies That Foster Curriculum Implementation

This study uses a sample of 454 teachers engaged in an inquiry science program to examine the effects of different characteristics of professional development on teachers’ knowledge and their ability to implement the program. The authors analyzed results from a survey of teachers served by 28 professional development providers within a hierarchical linear modeling framework. Consistent with findings from earlier studies of effective professional development, this study points to the significance of teachers’ perceptions about how coherent their professional development experiences were for teacher learning and program implementation. The authors also found that the incorporation of time for teachers to plan for implementation and provision of technical support were significant for promoting program implementation in the program.

[1]  L T Curtis,et al.  Innovations in learning. , 1968, The Journal of school health.

[2]  Robert J. Stevens,et al.  Advances in research on teaching , 1981 .

[3]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[4]  Larry Cuban.  Teachers and machines : the classroom use of technology since 1920 , 1986 .

[5]  M. Wittrock.  Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[6]  Edmund A. Marek,et al.  Effects of the learning cycle upon student and classroom teacher performance , 1991 .

[7]  Linda L. Cronin-Jones.  Science Teacher Beliefs and Their Influence on Curriculum Implementation: Two Case Studies. , 1991 .

[8]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[9]  Milbrey W. McLaughlin,et al.  Networks for Educational Change: Powerful and Problematic. , 1992 .

[10]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[11]  J. Little.  Teachers’ Professional Development in a Climate of Educational Reform , 1993 .

[12]  William S. Carlsen,et al.  Teacher knowledge and discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers' classrooms , 1993 .

[13]  R. Bybee.  Reforming Science Education: Social Perspectives and Personal Reflections , 1993 .

[14]  Joy A. Frechtling.  Teacher Enhancement Programs: A Perspective on the Last Four Decades. , 1995 .

[15]  D. Ball,et al.  Reform by the Book: What Is—or Might Be—the Role of Curriculum Materials in Teacher Learning and Instructional Reform? , 1996 .

[16]  Mark A. Smylie.  From Bureaucratic Control to Building Human Capital: The Importance of Teacher Learning in Education Reform , 1996 .

[17]  Larry Cuban,et al.  Tinkering toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform. , 1996 .

[18]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. , 1996 .

[19]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Innovations in learning : new environments for education , 1996 .

[20]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Reconstructing Conceptions of Local Capacity: The Local Education Agency’s Capacity for Ambitious Instructional Reform , 1997 .

[21]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Aligned Instructional Policy and Ambitious Pedagogy: Exploring Instructional Reform from the Classroom Perspective , 1997, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[22]  S. Loucks-Horsley.  Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics , 1997 .

[23]  Barrett N. Rock,et al.  The GLOBE Program , 1997 .

[24]  William J. Boone,et al.  Student Perceptions of Instruction, Peer Interest, and Adult Support for Middle School Science: Differences by Race and Gender , 1998 .

[25]  G. Wiggins,et al.  Understanding by Design , 1998 .

[26]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Teaching as the Learning Profession : Handbook of Policy and Practice , 1999 .

[27]  Forrest M. Mims,et al.  An International Haze-Monitoring Network for Students. , 1999 .

[28]  Julie Cess-Newsome,et al.  Secondary Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs about Subject Matter and their Impact on Instruction , 1999 .

[29]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[30]  S. Loucks-Horsley,et al.  Research on Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics and Science: The State of the Scene , 1999 .

[31]  Daniel P. Mayer.  Measuring Instructional Practice: Can Policymakers Trust Survey Data? , 1999 .

[32]  M. Kennedy.  Form and Substance in Mathematics and Science Professional Development. , 1999 .

[33]  James P. Spillane.  External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment , 1999 .

[34]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Constructing Extended Inquiry Projects: Curriculum Materials for Science Education Reform , 2000 .

[35]  Charlene M. Czerniak,et al.  Assessing Teachers' Beliefs about Their Science Teaching Context , 2000 .

[36]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? , 2000 .

[37]  B. Crawford.  Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers , 2000 .

[38]  William R. Penuel,et al.  Web-Based Student Assessment for Program Evaluation , 2000 .

[39]  Yuk Fai Cheong,et al.  HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling , 2000 .

[40]  E. Soloway,et al.  Creating Usable Innovations in Systemic Reform: Scaling Up Technology-Embedded Project-Based Science in Urban Schools , 2000 .

[41]  Jonathan A. Supovitz,et al.  The Effects of Professional Development on Science Teaching Practices and Classroom Culture , 2000 .

[42]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[43]  D. Cohen,et al.  Learning Policy: When State Education Reform Works , 2001 .

[44]  C. Coburn,et al.  Collective Sensemaking about Reading: How Teachers Mediate Reading Policy in Their Professional Communities , 2001 .

[45]  William R. Penuel,et al.  The Connected School: Technology and Learning in High School , 2001 .

[46]  Simon Veenman,et al.  The Coaching of Teachers: Results of Five Training Studies , 2001 .

[47]  Virginia Richardson,et al.  Handbook of Research on Teaching , 2001 .

[48]  Larry Cuban,et al.  High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox , 2001 .

[49]  Ann Lieberman,et al.  Teachers Caught in the Action: Professional Development That Matters , 2001 .

[50]  F. Mims,et al.  Development of an inexpensive handheld LED‐based Sun photometer for the GLOBE program , 2001 .

[51]  Y. Lincoln,et al.  Scientific Research in Education , 2004 .

[52]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2002 .

[53]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  Effects of Professional Development on Teachers’ Instruction: Results from a Three-year Longitudinal Study , 2002 .

[54]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  How Can Comprehensive School Reform Models Be Successfully Implemented? , 2002 .

[55]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Finding a Measure of Trust@@@Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement , 2004 .

[56]  Andrew C. Porter,et al.  Providing Effective Professional Development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program. , 2003 .

[57]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Resources, Instruction, and Research , 2003 .

[58]  What is the influence of the National Science Education Standards? : reviewing the evidence, a workshop summary , 2003 .

[59]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  What Does It Mean To Create Sustainable Science Curriculum Innovations? A Commentary. , 2003 .

[60]  Barry Fishman,et al.  Linking Teacher and Student Learning to Improve Professional Development in Systemic Reform. , 2003 .

[61]  William R. Penuel,et al.  Implementation variation and fidelity in an inquiry science program: Analysis of GLOBE data reporting patterns , 2004 .

[62]  Linda Darling-Hammond,et al.  Policies That Support Professional Development in an Era of Reform , 2011 .

[63]  Yong Zhao,et al.  Social Capital and the Diffusion of Innovations within Organizations: Application to the Implementation of Computer Technology in Schools , 2004 .

[64]  K. Frank,et al.  Social Capital and the Diffusion of Innovations Within Organizations: The Case of Computer Technology in Schools , 2004 .

[65]  Making the Most of Understanding by Design , 2004 .

[66]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Standards Deviation: How Schools Misunderstand Education Policy. CPRE Policy Briefs. RB-43. , 2005 .

[67]  H. Borko.  Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain , 2004 .

[68]  C. Coburn,et al.  Beyond Decoupling: Rethinking the Relationship Between the Institutional Environment and the Classroom , 2004 .

[69]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  Are We Asking the Right Questions? Using Cognitive Interviews to Improve Surveys in Education Research , 2004 .

[70]  Heather C. Hill,et al.  Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement , 2005 .

[71]  W. Penuel,et al.  The roles of regional partners in supporting an international earth science education program , 2005 .

[72]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning , 2005 .

[73]  Using Transformative Research To Explore Congruencies Between Science Reform and Urban Schools , 2006, ICLS.

[74]  A Role for Professional Development in Sustainability: Linking the Written Curriculum to Enactment , 2006, ICLS.

[75]  William R. Penuel,et al.  The Distribution of Resources and Expertise and the Implementation of Schoolwide Reform Initiatives , 2006, ICLS.

[76]  S. Barab,et al.  Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences , 2006 .

[77]  Professional Development: Planning and Design , 2008 .

[78]  Margaret Riel,et al.  Analyzing Teachers’ Professional Interactions in a School as Social Capital: A Social Network Approach , 2009, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.