Design strategies of sea urchin teeth: structure, composition and micromechanical relations to function.

The teeth of sea urchins comprise a variety of different structural entities, all of which are composed of magnesium-bearing calcite together with a small amount of organic material. The teeth are worn down continuously, but in such a way that they remain sharp and functional. Here we describe aspects of the structural, compositional and micromechanical properties of the teeth of Paracentrotus lividus using scanning electron microscopy, infrared spectrometry, atomic absorption. X-ray diffraction and microindentation. The S-shaped single crystalline calcitic fibres are one of the main structural elements of the tooth. They extend from the stone part to the keel. The diameter of the fibres increases gradually from less than 1 micron at the stone tip to about 20 microns at the keel end, while their MgCO3 contents decrease from about 13 mol% to about 4.5 mol%. Each fibre is coated by a thin organic sheath and surrounded by polycrystalline calcitic discs containing as much as 35 mol% MgCO3. This structure constitutes a unique kind of gradient fibre-reinforced ceramic matrix composite, whose microhardness and toughness decrease gradually from the stone part to the keel. Primary plates are also important structural elements of the tooth. Each primary plate has a very unusual sandwich-like structure with a calcitic envelope surrounding a thin apparently amorphous CaCO3 layer. This central layer, together with the primary plate/disc interface, improves the toughness of this zone by stopping and blunting cracks. The self-sharpening function of the teeth is believed to result from the combination of the geometrical shape of the main structural elements and their spatial arrangement, the interfacial strength between structural elements, and the hardness gradient extending from the working stone part to the surrounding zones. The sea urchin tooth structure possesses an array of interesting functional design features, some of which may possibly be applicable to materials science.

[1]  S. Weiner,et al.  Control and Design Principles in Biological Mineralization , 1992 .

[2]  S. Mann,et al.  Structure, morphology, composition and organization of biogenic minerals in limpet teeth , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  R. J. Williams,et al.  Biomineralization: Chemical and Biochemical Perspectives , 1989 .

[4]  M. D. Thouless,et al.  Effects of pull-out on the mechanical properties of ceramic-matrix composites , 1988 .

[5]  Waters Ne,et al.  Some mechanical and physical properties of teeth. , 1980 .

[6]  J. Aizenberg,et al.  Amorphous calcium carbonate transforms into calcite during sea urchin larval spicule growth , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  T. Koetzle,et al.  Biological Control of Crystal Texture: A Widespread Strategy for Adapting Crystal Properties to Function , 1993, Science.

[8]  R. Kitney,et al.  Biological Control , 1973, Nature.

[9]  S. Weiner,et al.  Organic matrixlike macromolecules associated with the mineral phase of sea urchin skeletal plates and teeth. , 1985, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[10]  S. Weiner,et al.  Transformation of Amorphous Calcium Phosphate to Crystalline Dahillite in the Radular Teeth of Chitons , 1985, Science.

[11]  K. Markel The Tooth Skeleton of Echinometra mathaei (Blainville)(Echinodermata,Echinoidea) , 1970 .

[12]  A. Evans,et al.  Failure Mechanisms in Ceramic‐Fiber/Ceramic‐Matrix Composites , 1985 .

[13]  P. C. Rieke,et al.  Innovative materials processing strategies: a biomimetic approach. , 1992, Science.

[14]  P. Wal Structural and material design of mature mineralized radula teeth of Patella vulgata (gastropoda) , 1989 .

[15]  J. Lawrence,et al.  The ultrastructure of the plumula of the tooth of Lytechinus variegatus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) , 1986 .

[16]  J. Papike,et al.  Primary Protodolomite in Echinoid Skeletons , 1969 .

[17]  A. P. Jackson,et al.  The mechanical design of nacre , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[18]  J. Currey,et al.  Structure of a sea urchin tooth , 1976 .

[19]  H. Lowenstam Opal Precipitation by Marine Gastropods (Mollusca) , 1971, Science.

[20]  N E Waters,et al.  Some mechanical and physical properties of teeth. , 1980, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[21]  J. Clohisy,et al.  Matrix proteins of the teeth of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus. , 1986, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[22]  J. E. Gordon,et al.  A mechanism for the control of crack propagation in all-brittle systems , 1964, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[23]  J. Schenker ZUR FUNKTIONELLEN ANATOMIE DER PROSTATA DES RINDES , 1950 .

[24]  H. Lowenstam Lepidocrocite, an Apatite Mineral, and Magnetite in Teeth of Chitons (Polyplacophora) , 1967, Science.

[25]  John D. Currey,et al.  Mechanical properties of mother of pearl in tension , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[26]  H. Lowenstam,et al.  Goethite in Radular Teeth of Recent Marine Gastropods , 1962, Science.

[27]  K. Chave A Solid Solution between Calcite and Dolomite , 1952, The Journal of Geology.

[28]  S. Weiner,et al.  Organization of extracellularly mineralized tissues: a comparative study of biological crystal growth. , 1986, CRC critical reviews in biochemistry.

[29]  J. Aizenberg,et al.  Stabilization of amorphous calcium carbonate by specialized macromolecules in biological and synthetic precipitates , 1996 .

[30]  B. Harris The mechanical behaviour of composite materials. , 1980, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.