Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method

The reliability analysis of engineering structural systems with limit state functions defined implicitly by time-consuming numerical models (e.g. finite element analysis structural models) requires the use of efficient solution strategies in order to keep the required computational costs at acceptable levels. In this paper, an adaptive Kriging surrogate model with active refinement is proposed to solve component reliability assessment problems (i.e. involving one single design point) with nonlinear and time-consuming implicit limit state functions with a moderate number of input basic random variables. The proposed model, in the first stage, uses an adaptive Kriging-based trust region method to search for the design point in the standard Gaussian space and predict an initial failure probability based on the first-order reliability method as well as sensitivity factors for the input basic random variables. This initial prediction is then verified or improved efficiently in a second stage using Monte Carlo simulation with importance sampling based on a Kriging surrogate model defined iteratively around the design point using an active refinement algorithm. A convergence criterion that detects the stabilization of the failure probability prediction during the active refinement process is also proposed and implemented. The usefulness of the proposed adaptive Kriging surrogate model in terms of accuracy and efficiency for reliability assessment of engineering structural systems is shown in the paper with two relevant numerical examples, involving a highly nonlinear analytical limit state function in two-dimensions and an advanced nonlinear finite element analysis structural model in a larger dimensional space.

[1]  Sonja Kuhnt,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 2010 .

[2]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  C. Bucher Asymptotic sampling for high-dimensional reliability analysis , 2009 .

[4]  Lei Shi,et al.  A new RBDO method using adaptive response surface and first-order score function for crashworthiness design , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Pedro G. Coelho,et al.  Structural reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and neural networks , 2008, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[6]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011 .

[7]  Ling Li,et al.  Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure , 2010, Statistics and Computing.

[8]  Maurice Lemaire,et al.  Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and Support Vector Machines , 2011 .

[9]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Assessment of IACS-CSR implicit safety levels for buckling strength of stiffened panels for double hull tankers , 2011 .

[10]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Corrosion fatigue and multiple site damage reliability analysis , 2003 .

[11]  Sanjay R. Arwade,et al.  Computational Analysis of Randomness in Structural Mechanics , 2011 .

[12]  Sang Hyo Kim,et al.  Response surface method using vector projected sampling points , 1997 .

[13]  Jeom Kee Paik,et al.  Methods for ultimate limit state assessment of ships and ship-shaped offshore structures: Part II stiffened panels , 2008 .

[14]  Jarosław Knabel,et al.  FE based structural reliability analysis using STAND environment , 2009 .

[15]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  Neural-network-based reliability analysis: a comparative study , 2001 .

[16]  Zhenzhou Lu,et al.  Subset simulation for structural reliability sensitivity analysis , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis , 1993 .

[18]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Meta-models for structural reliability and uncertainty quantification , 2012, 1203.2062.

[19]  Irfan Kaymaz,et al.  Application Of Kriging Method To Structural Reliability Problems , 2005 .

[20]  J.-M. Bourinet,et al.  Rare-event probability estimation with adaptive support vector regression surrogates , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[22]  Enrico Zio,et al.  An improved adaptive kriging-based importance technique for sampling multiple failure regions of low probability , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Bernt J. Leira,et al.  System Reliability Analysis by Monte Carlo Based Method and Finite Element Structural Models , 2014 .

[24]  Guillaume Perrin,et al.  Active learning surrogate models for the conception of systems with multiple failure modes , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[25]  B. Sudret,et al.  Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis , 2011, 1105.0562.

[26]  A. Naess,et al.  System reliability analysis by enhanced Monte Carlo simulation , 2009 .

[27]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[28]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  Filtered importance sampling with support vector margin: A powerful method for structural reliability analysis , 2007 .

[29]  P. Das,et al.  Cumulative formation of response surface and its use in reliability analysis , 2000 .

[30]  Â. Teixeira,et al.  Ultimate strength of plates with random fields of corrosion , 2008 .

[31]  A. Olsson,et al.  On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis , 2003 .

[32]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Kriging response surface reliability analysis of a ship-stiffened plate with initial imperfections , 2015 .

[33]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[34]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Adaptive simulation for system reliability analysis of large structures , 2000 .

[35]  H. Matthies,et al.  Uncertainties in probabilistic numerical analysis of structures and solids-Stochastic finite elements , 1997 .

[36]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Structural reliability analyis of elastic-plastic structures using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation , 1996 .

[37]  Stefano Bruni,et al.  Predicting railway wheel wear under uncertainty of wear coefficient, using universal kriging , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[38]  Hai Liu,et al.  A Sequential Kriging reliability analysis method with characteristics of adaptive sampling regions and parallelizability , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[39]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Reliability analysis of plate elements under uniaxial compression using an adaptive response surface approach , 2015 .

[40]  Stefano Marelli,et al.  Rare Event Estimation Using Polynomial-Chaos Kriging , 2017 .

[41]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-SYS: An adaptation of the AK-MCS method for system reliability , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[42]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Kriging Metamodeling in Simulation: A Review , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  L. Swiler,et al.  Construction of response surfaces based on progressive-lattice-sampling experimental designs with application to uncertainty propagation , 2004 .

[44]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  A study on a stopping criterion for active refinement algorithms in Kriging surrogate models , 2015 .

[45]  Wei Wang,et al.  Non-linear partial least squares response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[46]  Â. Teixeira,et al.  Assessment of the efficiency of Kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis , 2014 .

[47]  N. Gayton,et al.  CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis , 2003 .

[48]  Bernt J. Leira,et al.  System reliability analysis of a stiffened panel under combined uniaxial compression and lateral pressure loads , 2012 .

[49]  Jian Wang,et al.  LIF: A new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[50]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Reliability analysis of automotive body-door subsystem , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[51]  C. Soares,et al.  Response surface approach to the probability distribution of the strength of compressed plates , 2002 .

[52]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[53]  Thomas Most,et al.  A comparison of approximate response functions in structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[54]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Combining polynomial chaos expansions and Kriging for solving structural reliability problems , 2014 .

[55]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  An examination of methods for approximating implicit limit state functions from the viewpoint of statistical learning theory , 2004 .

[56]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[57]  João Cardoso,et al.  Review and application of Artificial Neural Networks models in reliability analysis of steel structures , 2015 .

[58]  M. Eldred,et al.  Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions , 2008 .