Distributed Dendritic Processing Facilitates Object Detection: A Computational Analysis on the Visual System of the Fly

Background Detecting objects is an important task when moving through a natural environment. Flies, for example, may land on salient objects or may avoid collisions with them. The neuronal ensemble of Figure Detection cells (FD-cells) in the visual system of the fly is likely to be involved in controlling these behaviours, as these cells are more sensitive to objects than to extended background structures. Until now the computations in the presynaptic neuronal network of FD-cells and, in particular, the functional significance of the experimentally established distributed dendritic processing of excitatory and inhibitory inputs is not understood. Methodology/Principal Findings We use model simulations to analyse the neuronal computations responsible for the preference of FD-cells for small objects. We employed a new modelling approach which allowed us to account for the spatial spread of electrical signals in the dendrites while avoiding detailed compartmental modelling. The models are based on available physiological and anatomical data. Three models were tested each implementing an inhibitory neural circuit, but differing by the spatial arrangement of the inhibitory interaction. Parameter optimisation with an evolutionary algorithm revealed that only distributed dendritic processing satisfies the constraints arising from electrophysiological experiments. In contrast to a direct dendro-dendritic inhibition of the FD-cell (Direct Distributed Inhibition model), an inhibition of its presynaptic retinotopic elements (Indirect Distributed Inhibition model) requires smaller changes in input resistance in the inhibited neurons during visual stimulation. Conclusions/Significance Distributed dendritic inhibition of retinotopic elements as implemented in our Indirect Distributed Inhibition model is the most plausible wiring scheme for the neuronal circuit of FD-cells. This microcircuit is computationally similar to lateral inhibition between the retinotopic elements. Hence, distributed inhibition might be an alternative explanation of perceptual phenomena currently explained by lateral inhibition networks.

[1]  M Egelhaaf,et al.  Neural circuit tuning fly visual neurons to motion of small objects. II. Input organization of inhibitory circuit elements revealed by electrophysiological and optical recording techniques. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  A. Aertsen Brain theory : spatio-temporal aspects of brain function , 1993 .

[3]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Membrane Potential Fluctuations Determine the Precision of Spike Timing and Synchronous Activity: A Model Study , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[4]  P. L. Scilley,et al.  Moving background patterns reveal double-opponency of directionally specific pigeon tectal neurons , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  B. Kimmerle,et al.  Object detection in the fly during simulated translatory flight , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[6]  Thomas Collett,et al.  Visual neurones in the anterior optic tract of the privet hawk moth , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[7]  M. O'Shea,et al.  NEURONAL BASIS OF A SENSORY ANALYSER , THE ACRID ID MOVEMENT DETECTOR SYSTEM , 2005 .

[8]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Influence of the presentation of remote visual stimuli on visual responses of cat area 17 and lateral suprasylvian area , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  勇一 作村,et al.  Biophysics of Computation , 2001 .

[10]  Neuronal basis of a sensory analyser, the acridid movement detector system. III. Control of response amplitude by tonic lateral inhibition. , 1976, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Deep tectal cells in pigeons respond to kinematograms , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  T. Poggio,et al.  Nonlinear interactions in a dendritic tree: localization, timing, and role in information processing. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  J Allman,et al.  Direction- and Velocity-Specific Responses from beyond the Classical Receptive Field in the Middle Temporal Visual Area (MT) , 1985, Perception.

[14]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Synapse distribution on VCH, an inhibitory, motion‐sensitive interneuron in the fly visual system , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Single visual neurons code opposing motion independent of direction. , 1983, Science.

[17]  M Egelhaaf,et al.  Movement detection in arthropods. , 1993, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[18]  R. Mason,et al.  Responsiveness of cells in the cat's superior colliculus to textured visual stimuli , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Robert M. Olberg,et al.  Object- and self-movement detectors in the ventral nerve cord of the dragonfly , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[20]  David C. O'Carroll,et al.  Retinotopic Organization of Small-Field-Target-Detecting Neurons in the Insect Visual System , 2007, Current Biology.

[21]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Selectivity for relative motion in the monkey superior colliculus. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  G. Horridge The Compound eye and vision of insects , 1975 .

[23]  Roland Hengstenberg,et al.  Intracellular Staining of Insect Neurons with Procion Yellow , 1980 .

[24]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Implications of functionally different synaptic inputs for neuronal gain and computational properties of fly visual interneurons. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  G. Mandl Responses of visual cells in cat superior colliculus to relative pattern movement , 1985, Vision Research.

[26]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  R. Hengstenberg,et al.  Binocular contributions to optic flow processing in the fly visual system. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  K. Hausen Functional Characterization and Anatomical Identification of Motion Sensitive Neurons in the Lobula plate of the Blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala , 1976 .

[29]  A Borst,et al.  Spatial response properties of contralateral inhibited lobula plate tangential cells in the fly visual system , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[30]  A. Borst,et al.  Neural circuit tuning fly visual interneurons to motion of small objects. I. Dissection of the circuit by pharmacological and photoinactivation techniques. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  T. Collett,et al.  Vision during flight , 1975 .

[32]  THOMAS COLLETT,et al.  Visual Neurones for Tracking Moving Targets , 1971, Nature.

[33]  K. Hausen Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Neural image processing by dendritic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Kenneth V. Price,et al.  An introduction to differential evolution , 1999 .

[36]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  The neural computation of visual motion information. , 2006 .

[37]  Robert M. Olberg,et al.  Identified target-selective visual interneurons descending from the dragonfly brain , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[38]  A. Borst,et al.  Dendro-Dendritic Interactions between Motion-Sensitive Large-Field Neurons in the Fly , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Charles M. Higgins,et al.  An elaborated model of fly small-target tracking , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[40]  David O'Carroll,et al.  Feature-detecting neurons in dragonflies , 1993, Nature.

[41]  P Sterling,et al.  Visual receptive fields in the superior colliculus of the cat. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  H. Tsai Responses of toad's tectal neurons to in-phase and anti-phase movements of object and textured background , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[43]  M. Egelhaaf On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly , 1985 .

[44]  C. H. Fraser Rowell,et al.  The neuronal basis of a sensory analyser, the acridid movement detector system. IV. The preference for small field stimuli. , 1977, The Journal of experimental biology.

[45]  B. Kimmerle,et al.  Detection of object motion by a fly neuron during simulated flight , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[46]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Visual Motion and Its Role in the Stabilization of Gaze , 1992 .

[47]  A. Borst,et al.  Dendritic Computation of Direction Selectivity and Gain Control in Visual Interneurons , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  Bart R. H. Geurten,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying target detection in a dragonfly centrifugal neuron , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[49]  B. J. Frost,et al.  Double-opponent-process mechanism underlying RF-structure of directionally specific cells of cat lateral suprasylvian visual area , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Processing of synaptic signals in fly interneurons selectively responsive to small moving objects , 1993 .