What drives fine-scale movements of large herbivores? A case study using moose

Understanding animal movements across heterogeneous landscapes is of great interest because it helps explain the dynamic processes influencing the distribution of individuals in space. Research on how animals move relative to short-range environmental characteristics are scarce. Our objective was to determine the variables influencing movement of a large ungulate, the moose Alces alces, ranging across a boreal landscape, and to link movement behaviour with limiting factors at a fine scale. We assessed 7 candidate models composed of vegetation, solar energy, and topography variables using step selection functions (SSF) for male and female moose across daily and annual periods. We selected and weighted models using the Bayesian Information Criterion. Variables influencing small-scale movements of moose differed among periods and between sexes, likely in response to corresponding changes in the importance of limiting factors. Best models often combined many types of variables, although simpler models composed of only vegetation or topography variables explained male's movements during rut and early winter. Moose steps were observed in good feeding stands from summer to early winter for females and from spring to early winter for males, supporting other studies of moose habitat selection. From summer to early winter, females alternatively selected and avoided cover stands during day and night, respectively. Solar energy reaching the ground was important, particularly during late winter and spring, likely due to its effect on snow cover, air temperature, or plant phenology. Moose generally moved in gentle slopes and variable elevation, which may have increased their chances of finding high quality forage, or improved their search of suitable calving sites or mates. Our study revealed the great complexity and dynamic aspects of animal movements in a heterogeneous landscape. Analysis of animal movement provides complementary information to more static habitat selection analyses and helps understanding the spatial variations in the distribution of individuals through time.

[1]  E. S. Telfer,et al.  Studies of morphological parameters affecting ungulate locomotion in snow , 1979 .

[2]  M. Boyce,et al.  WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 2005 .

[3]  Lalit Kumar,et al.  Modelling Topographic Variation in Solar Radiation in a GIS Environment , 1997, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  S. L. Lima,et al.  SEARCH STRATEGIES FOR LANDSCAPE‐LEVEL INTERPATCH MOVEMENTS , 1999 .

[5]  R. Courtois,et al.  Space use of moose in relation to food availability , 2005 .

[6]  R. Courtois,et al.  Behavioural responses of moose to thermal conditions in the boreal forest1 , 2004 .

[7]  David Saltz,et al.  Forging at Different Spatial Scales: Dorcas Gazelles Foraging for Lilies in the Negev Desert , 1994 .

[8]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Plant phenology, migration and geographical variation in body weight of a large herbivore: the effect of a variable topography , 2001 .

[9]  K. Parker,et al.  Calf Survival of Woodland Caribou in a Multi-Predator Ecosystem , 2006 .

[10]  F. Schwab,et al.  Moose selection of canopy cover types related to operative temperature, forage, and snow depth , 1991 .

[11]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  Ecological Scale and Habitat Use , 1987 .

[12]  T. Skogland.  Wild reindeer foraging‐niche organization , 1984 .

[13]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[14]  Louie H. Yang,et al.  The Ecology of Individuals: Incidence and Implications of Individual Specialization , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[16]  R. Courtois,et al.  RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF SUCCINYLCHOLINE, XYLAZINE, AND CARFENTANIL/XYLAZINE MIXTURES TO IMMOBILIZE FREE-RANGING MOOSE , 1999, Journal of wildlife diseases.

[17]  R. Courtois,et al.  Linking moose habitat selection to limiting factors , 2005 .

[18]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[19]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Effects of snow depth on food and habitat selection by roe deer Capreolus capreolus along an altitudinal gradient in south-central Norway , 1997, Wildlife Biology.

[20]  Mark Hebblewhite,et al.  Modelling wildlife–human relationships for social species with mixed‐effects resource selection models , 2007 .

[21]  Nils Chr. Stenseth,et al.  CLIMATIC VARIABILITY, PLANT PHENOLOGY, AND NORTHERN UNGULATES , 1999 .

[22]  J. Kie.  Optimal Foraging and Risk of Predation: Effects on Behavior and Social Structure in Ungulates , 1999 .

[23]  D. Heard,et al.  The relationship between food intake and predation risk in migratory caribou and implications to caribou and wolf population dynamics , 1996 .

[24]  A. Sih,et al.  Dispersal Behavior, Boldness, and the Link to Invasiveness: A Comparison of Four Gambusia Species , 2004, Biological Invasions.

[25]  D. H. Gray,et al.  An evaluation of snow accumulation and ablation processes for land surface modelling , 1998 .

[26]  D.J.H. SLEEP,et al.  Statistical Versus Biological Hypothesis Testing: Response to Steidl , 2007 .

[27]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Assessing habitat selection when availability changes , 1996 .

[28]  Jean-Pierre Ouellet,et al.  Caractéristiques des sites de mise bas de l'orignal (Alces alces) , 1998 .

[29]  R. Courtois,et al.  Behavior of Moose Relative to a Road Network , 2008 .

[30]  P. Turchin.  Quantitative analysis of movement : measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants , 1998 .

[31]  Arthur R. Rodgers,et al.  Timber-management and natural-disturbance effects on moose habitat:landscape evaluation. , 1997 .

[32]  Shelley A. Hinsley,et al.  Modelling the third dimension: Incorporating topography into the movement rules of an individual-based spatially explicit population model , 2007 .

[33]  K. Parker,et al.  Energy expenditures for locomotion by mule deer and elk , 1984 .

[34]  Torkild Tveraa,et al.  Hierarchical patch dynamics and animal movement pattern , 2006, Oecologia.

[35]  G. Belovsky,et al.  The time-energy budget of a moose. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[36]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Cover as a habitat element for temperate ungulates: effects on habitat selection and demography , 1999 .

[37]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[38]  M. Boyce,et al.  Evaluating resource selection functions , 2002 .

[39]  F. Weckerly,et al.  Sexual Segregation in Ungulates: New Directions for Research , 1996 .

[40]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Context-dependent perceptual ranges and their relevance to animal movements in landscapes , 2004 .

[41]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  A MULTISCALE BEHAVIORAL APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING THE MOVEMENTS OF WOODLAND CARIBOU , 2002 .

[42]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Movement parameters of ungulates and scale‐specific responses to the environment , 2002 .

[43]  M. Festa‐Bianchet,et al.  Seasonal range selection in bighorn sheep: conflicts between forage quality, forage quantity, and predator avoidance , 1988, Oecologia.

[44]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Factors influencing female home range sizes in elk (Cervus elaphus) in North American landscapes , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[45]  K. Parker,et al.  Habitat selection by female Stone's sheep in relation to vegetation, topography, and risk of predation , 2007 .

[46]  S. Stearns.  Trade-offs in life-history evolution , 1989 .

[47]  Douglas H. Johnson.  THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[48]  S. Menard.  Applied Logistic Regression Analysis , 1996 .

[49]  H. Loxdale,et al.  Tracking movement in small insect pests, with special reference to aphid populations , 2004 .

[50]  P. V. Soest.  Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant , 1994 .

[51]  Darcy R. Visscher,et al.  Scales of movement by elk (Cervus elaphus) in response to heterogeneity in forage resources and predation risk , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[52]  S. Creel,et al.  Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves , 2005 .

[53]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Predator-prey shell games: large-scale movement and its implications for decision-making by prey , 2002 .

[54]  F. Messier,et al.  Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors , 2000 .

[55]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Scale-dependent trade-offs in foraging by European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) during winter , 1999 .