Comparative phylogenomic analyses of teleost fish Hox gene clusters: lessons from the cichlid fish Astatotilapia burtoni

BackgroundTeleost fish have seven paralogous clusters of Hox genes stemming from two complete genome duplications early in vertebrate evolution, and an additional genome duplication during the evolution of ray-finned fish, followed by the secondary loss of one cluster. Gene duplications on the one hand, and the evolution of regulatory sequences on the other, are thought to be among the most important mechanisms for the evolution of new gene functions. Cichlid fish, the largest family of vertebrates with about 2500 species, are famous examples of speciation and morphological diversity. Since this diversity could be based on regulatory changes, we chose to study the coding as well as putative regulatory regions of their Hox clusters within a comparative genomic framework.ResultsWe sequenced and characterized all seven Hox clusters of Astatotilapia burtoni, a haplochromine cichlid fish. Comparative analyses with data from other teleost fish such as zebrafish, two species of pufferfish, stickleback and medaka were performed. We traced losses of genes and microRNAs of Hox clusters, the medaka lineage seems to have lost more microRNAs than the other fish lineages. We found that each teleost genome studied so far has a unique set of Hox genes. The hoxb7a gene was lost independently several times during teleost evolution, the most recent event being within the radiation of East African cichlid fish. The conserved non-coding sequences (CNS) encompass a surprisingly large part of the clusters, especially in the HoxAa, HoxCa, and HoxDa clusters. Across all clusters, we observe a trend towards an increased content of CNS towards the anterior end.ConclusionThe gene content of Hox clusters in teleost fishes is more variable than expected, with each species studied so far having a different set. Although the highest loss rate of Hox genes occurred immediately after whole genome duplications, our analyses showed that gene loss continued and is still ongoing in all teleost lineages. Along with the gene content, the CNS content also varies across clusters. The excess of CNS at the anterior end of clusters could imply a stronger conservation of anterior expression patters than those towards more posterior areas of the embryo.

[1]  S. G. Stephens.  Possible Significance of Duplication in Evolution , 1951 .

[2]  Dr. Susumu Ohno.  Evolution by Gene Duplication , 1970, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[3]  E. Lewis.  A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila , 1978, Nature.

[4]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[5]  M. D'Esposito,et al.  The human HOX gene family. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  P. Gruss,et al.  Murine developmental control genes. , 1990, Science.

[7]  Jordi Garcia-Fernàndez,et al.  Archetypal organization of the amphioxus Hox gene cluster , 1994, Nature.

[8]  C. Tabin,et al.  Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud. , 1996, Development.

[9]  A. Sidow.  Gen(om)e duplications in the evolution of early vertebrates. , 1996, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[10]  D. Duboule,et al.  Teleost HoxD and HoxA genes: comparison with tetrapods and functional evolution of the HOXD complex , 1996, Mechanisms of Development.

[11]  M. C. D. Pinna,et al.  Chapter 7 – Teleostean Monophyly , 1996 .

[12]  S. Mundlos,et al.  Altered Growth and Branching Patterns in Synpolydactyly Caused by Mutations in HOXD13 , 1996, Science.

[13]  G. Wagner,et al.  Evidence for four Hox clusters in the killifish Fundulus heteroclitus (teleostei). , 1996, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[14]  D. Mortlock,et al.  Mutation of HOXA13 in hand-foot-genital syndrome , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[15]  S. Karlin,et al.  Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  Byrappa Venkatesh,et al.  Organization of the Fugu rubripes Hox clusters: evidence for continuing evolution of vertebrate Hox complexes , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[17]  Y L Wang,et al.  Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. , 1998, Science.

[18]  A. Meyer,et al.  Gene and genome duplications in vertebrates: the one-to-four (-to-eight in fish) rule and the evolution of novel gene functions. , 1999, Current opinion in cell biology.

[19]  Y. Yan,et al.  Zebrafish comparative genomics and the origins of vertebrate chromosomes. , 2000, Genome research.

[20]  Lior Pachter,et al.  VISTA : visualizing global DNA sequence alignments of arbitrary length , 2000, Bioinform..

[21]  P. Holland,et al.  The amphioxus Hox cluster: deuterostome posterior flexibility and Hox14 , 2000, Evolution & development.

[22]  M. Kondo,et al.  A detailed linkage map of medaka, Oryzias latipes: comparative genomics and genome evolution. , 2000, Genetics.

[23]  M. Nishida,et al.  Mitochondrial Molecular Clocks and the Origin of Euteleostean Biodiversity: Familial Radiation of Perciforms May Have Predated the Cretaceous/Tertiary Boundary , 2000 .

[24]  Masahiro Kato.  The Biology of Biodiversity , 2000, Springer Japan.

[25]  Y Van de Peer,et al.  Comparative genomics provides evidence for an ancient genome duplication event in fish. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees , 2001, Bioinform..

[27]  Y Van de Peer,et al.  Genome duplication, divergent resolution and speciation. , 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[28]  Axel Meyer,et al.  Genome Duplications and Accelerated Evolution of Hox Genes and Cluster Architecture in Teleost Fishes1 , 2001 .

[29]  D. Larhammar,et al.  The human Hox-bearing chromosome regions did arise by block or chromosome (or even genome) duplications. , 2002, Genome research.

[30]  P. Holland,et al.  Were vertebrates octoploid? , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[31]  Paramvir S. Dehal,et al.  Whole-Genome Shotgun Assembly and Analysis of the Genome of Fugu rubripes , 2002, Science.

[32]  Ken Dewar,et al.  Molecular evolution of the HoxA cluster in the three major gnathostome lineages , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  V. Prince,et al.  Knockdown of duplicated zebrafish hoxb1 genes reveals distinct roles in hindbrain patterning and a novel mechanism of duplicate gene retention. , 2002, Development.

[34]  H. Rundle,et al.  Speciation in nature : the threespine stickleback model systems , 2002 .

[35]  Axel Meyer,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of regulatory elements in vertebrate Hox gene clusters. , 2003, Genome research.

[36]  J. Inoue,et al.  Major patterns of higher teleostean phylogenies: a new perspective based on 100 complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. , 2003, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[37]  M. Laubichler.  Review of: Carroll, Sean B., Jennifer K. Grenier and Scott D. Weatherbee: From DNA to diversity : molecular genetics and the evolution of animal design. Malden, Mass [u.a.]: Blackwell Science 2001 , 2003 .

[38]  A. Meyer,et al.  Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22000 species of ray-finned fish. , 2003, Genome research.

[39]  Chuong B. Do,et al.  Access the most recent version at doi: 10.1101/gr.926603 References , 2003 .

[40]  O. Gascuel,et al.  A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[41]  Sonja J. Prohaska,et al.  The Shark HoxN Cluster Is Homologous to the Human HoxD Cluster , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[42]  Alan Christoffels,et al.  Hox gene clusters in the Indonesian coelacanth, Latimeria menadoensis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models , 2003, Bioinform..

[44]  M. Blaxter,et al.  Hox gene evolution in nematodes: novelty conserved. , 2003, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[45]  L. Hood,et al.  Regulatory gene networks and the properties of the developmental process , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  R. Tjian,et al.  Transcription regulation and animal diversity , 2003, Nature.

[47]  Sonja J. Prohaska,et al.  Molecular Evolution of Duplicated Ray Finned Fish HoxA Clusters: Increased Synonymous Substitution Rate and Asymmetrical Co-divergence of Coding and Non-coding Sequences , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[48]  R. Durbin,et al.  GeneWise and Genomewise. , 2004, Genome research.

[49]  J. Gibson-Brown,et al.  Developmental expression of the amphioxus Tbx1/10 gene illuminates the evolution of vertebrate branchial arches and sclerotome , 2004, Development Genes and Evolution.

[50]  A. Meyer,et al.  Response to Comment on "Origin of the Superflock of Cichlid Fishes from Lake Victoria, East Africa" , 2004, Science.

[51]  Klaas Vandepoele,et al.  Major events in the genome evolution of vertebrates: paranome age and size differ considerably between ray-finned fishes and land vertebrates. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  N. Satoh,et al.  Ciona intestinalis Hox gene cluster: Its dispersed structure and residual colinear expression in development. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  Axel Meyer,et al.  Novel evolutionary relationship among four fish model systems. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[54]  Alan Christoffels,et al.  Fugu genome analysis provides evidence for a whole-genome duplication early during the evolution of ray-finned fishes. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[55]  Angel Amores,et al.  Developmental roles of pufferfish Hox clusters and genome evolution in ray-fin fish. , 2003, Genome research.

[56]  Charles E. Chapple,et al.  Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype , 2004, Nature.

[57]  Sonja J. Prohaska,et al.  Exclusion of repetitive DNA elements from gnathostome Hox clusters. , 2004, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[58]  A. Meyer,et al.  The species flocks of East African cichlid fishes: recent advances in molecular phylogenetics and population genetics , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[59]  Sonja J. Prohaska,et al.  Bichir HoxA cluster sequence reveals surprising trends in ray-finned fish genomic evolution. , 2003, Genome research.

[60]  Hans Lehrach,et al.  Hox cluster disintegration with persistent anteroposterior order of expression in Oikopleura dioica , 2004, Nature.

[61]  Sonja J. Prohaska,et al.  Divergence of conserved non-coding sequences: rate estimates and relative rate tests. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[62]  Sonja J. Prohaska,et al.  Surveying phylogenetic footprints in large gene clusters: applications to Hox cluster duplications. , 2004, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[63]  A. Meyer,et al.  Phylogenetic Timing of the Fish-Specific Genome Duplication Correlates with the Diversification of Teleost Fish , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[64]  D. Larhammar,et al.  Numerous groups of chromosomal regional paralogies strongly indicate two genome doublings at the root of the vertebrates , 2004, Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics.

[65]  G. Barlow,et al.  Fishes of the world , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[66]  Thomas P. Powers and Chris T. Amemiya.  Evolutionary Plasticity of Vertebrate Hox Genes , 2004 .

[67]  P. Holland.  More genes in vertebrates? , 2004, Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics.

[68]  A. Meyer,et al.  Out of Tanganyika: Genesis, explosive speciation, key-innovations and phylogeography of the haplochromine cichlid fishes , 2005, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[69]  S. Teichmann,et al.  Gene regulatory network growth by duplication , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[70]  B. Birren,et al.  Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Nature.

[71]  Rakesh K Mishra,et al.  Extreme conservation of noncoding DNA near HoxD complex of vertebrates , 2004, BMC Genomics.

[72]  J. Inoue,et al.  Mitogenomic evidence for the monophyly of elopomorph fishes (Teleostei) and the evolutionary origin of the leptocephalus larva. , 2004, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[73]  Axel Meyer,et al.  Hox clusters as models for vertebrate genome evolution. , 2005, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[74]  Peter F Stadler,et al.  Evolution of microRNAs located within Hox gene clusters. , 2005, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[75]  A. Durston,et al.  Knockdown of the complete Hox paralogous group 1 leads to dramatic hindbrain and neural crest defects , 2005, Development.

[76]  E. Engle,et al.  Homozygous HOXA1 mutations disrupt human brainstem, inner ear, cardiovascular and cognitive development , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[77]  Giorgio Bernardi,et al.  Organization and base composition of tilapia Hox genes: implications for the evolution of Hox clusters in fish. , 2005, Gene.

[78]  A. Meyer,et al.  From 2R to 3R: evidence for a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD). , 2005, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[79]  S. Carroll,et al.  Evolution at Two Levels: On Genes and Form , 2005, PLoS biology.

[80]  J. Raes,et al.  Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[81]  A. Meyer,et al.  Many genes in fish have species-specific asymmetric rates of molecular evolution , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[82]  Dirk Steinke,et al.  Novel Relationships Among Ten Fish Model Species Revealed Based on a Phylogenomic Analysis Using ESTs , 2006, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[83]  Paramvir S. Dehal,et al.  Two Rounds of Whole Genome Duplication in the Ancestral Vertebrate , 2005, PLoS biology.

[84]  Steven Maere,et al.  Genome duplication and the origin of angiosperms. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[85]  M. Low,et al.  Subfunctionalization of expression and peptide domains following the ancient duplication of the proopiomelanocortin gene in teleost fishes. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[86]  Sònia Casillas,et al.  Conservation of regulatory sequences and gene expression patterns in the disintegrating Drosophila Hox gene complex. , 2005, Genome research.

[87]  V. Prince,et al.  Conserved co-regulation and promoter sharing of hoxb3a and hoxb4a in zebrafish. , 2006, Developmental biology.

[88]  O. Jaillon,et al.  Gene loss and evolutionary rates following whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[89]  C. Amemiya,et al.  A BAC library of the East African haplochromine cichlid fish Astatotilapia burtoni. , 2006, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[90]  Steven Maere,et al.  The gain and loss of genes during 600 million years of vertebrate evolution , 2006, Genome Biology.

[91]  Esther G. L. Koh,et al.  Highly conserved syntenic blocks at the vertebrate Hox loci and conserved regulatory elements within and outside Hox gene clusters. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[92]  R. Guigó,et al.  Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia , 2006, Nature.

[93]  Eric H Davidson,et al.  Unusual gene order and organization of the sea urchin hox cluster. , 2006, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[94]  An Mannaert,et al.  A PCR survey for posterior Hox genes in amphibians. , 2006, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[95]  Yuji Kohara,et al.  Organization and structure of hox gene loci in medaka genome and comparison with those of pufferfish and zebrafish genomes. , 2006, Gene.

[96]  P. Holland,et al.  Breakup of a homeobox cluster after genome duplication in teleosts , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[97]  A. Meyer,et al.  Asymmetric evolution in two fish-specifically duplicated receptor tyrosine kinase paralogons involved in teleost coloration. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[98]  A. Durston,et al.  The zebrafish hoxDb cluster has been reduced to a single microRNA , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[99]  Peter F Stadler,et al.  The "fish-specific" Hox cluster duplication is coincident with the origin of teleosts. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[100]  Shunping He,et al.  Mitochondrial molecular clocks and the origin of the major Otocephalan clades (Pisces: Teleostei): A new insight. , 2006, Gene.

[101]  Morgane Thomas-Chollier,et al.  HoxPred: automated classification of Hox proteins using combinations of generalised profiles , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[102]  Xiayun Jiang,et al.  Hox gene clusters in blunt snout bream, Megalobrama amblycephala and comparison with those of zebrafish, fugu and medaka genomes. , 2007, Gene.

[103]  Sonja J. Prohaska,et al.  The duplication of the Hox gene clusters in teleost fishes , 2004, Theory in Biosciences.

[104]  Ncbi.  National Center for Biotechnology Information , 2008 .

[105]  Yasuko Takahashi,et al.  Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events , 2022 .