Modeling Base Flow Soil Water Residence Times From Deuterium Concentrations

Three approaches to determining mean soil water residence times in a steep headwater catchment were investigated. The deuterium concentrations of soil water collected from 11 suction cup samplers at the Maimai M8 catchment were determined weekly for 14 weeks and the results compared with those of rainfall in the same period. Deuterium variations in the suction samples were considerably delayed and diminished compared with the rainfall, indicating significant storage times and mixing with soil water. Soil matrix water at shallow levels (∼200 mm depth) in unsaturated soils was relatively responsive to fresh input, but deeper water and water near the stream subject to occasional water table rises showed much less variation. Steady state and non-steady state exponential models gave similar mean residence times, ranging from 12 to more than 100 days for different locations. Three groups of soil water response were defined, comprising shallow, medium and deep (near-stream) soil locations based on the mean residence times. The nonsteady models revealed considerable week-to-week and longer variations in mean residence time for shallow soil (SL4), but indicated that steady state models could adequately represent the system in the overall period investigated. In the third approach, model types and parameters that gave the best fits to the soil water deuterium concentrations were determined. Exponential and especially dispersion models were the most satisfactory. Weighting the input (rainfall δD) partially or fully with the amount of rainfall gave much worse fits than with the unweighted input, showing that much of the rainfall bypasses the soil matrix. The best fitting dispersion model (designated DM2) yielded the most accurate mean residence times: 13 days for shallow soil (SL4), 42 days for soil at 400 mm depth (SL5), both at midslope locations, and 63 days for soil at 800 mm depth near the stream (SL2). Capillary flow was important for the unsaturated shallow soil (SL4), while advection and hydrodynamic dispersion (mixing) were more dominant for the periodically saturated (SL5) and the generally saturated (SL2) soils.

[1]  M. P. Mosley,et al.  Subsurface flow velocities through selected forest soils, South Island, New Zealand , 1982 .

[2]  A. Zuber,et al.  On the physical meaning of the dispersion equation and its solutions for different initial and boundary conditions , 1978 .

[3]  Max Coleman,et al.  Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis , 1982 .

[4]  D. A. McKie A study of soil variability within the Blackball Hill soils, Reefton, New Zealand , 1978 .

[5]  A. Rodhe Spring Flood Meltwater or Groundwater , 1981 .

[6]  M. Sklash,et al.  A conceptual model of watershed response to rainfall, developed through the use of oxygen-18 as a natural tracer , 1976 .

[7]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Deuterium variations in storm rainfall: Implications for stream hydrograph separation , 1990 .

[8]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  The age, origin and pathway of subsurface stormflow in a steep humid headwater catchment. , 1988 .

[9]  P. Maloszewski,et al.  Application of flow models in an alpine catchment area using tritium and deuterium data , 1983 .

[10]  R. J. Avanzino,et al.  Variation of rain chemistry during storms at two sites in northern California , 1979 .

[11]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  A rationale for old water discharge through macropores in a steep, humid catchment. , 1990 .

[12]  D. Dewalle,et al.  Sources of acidic storm flow in an Appalachian Headwater Stream , 1989 .

[13]  A. Pearce,et al.  Storm runoff generation in humid headwater catchments 1 , 1986 .

[14]  Andrew J. Pearce,et al.  Storm Runoff generation in humid headwater catchments 2. A case study of hillslope and low-order stream response , 1986 .

[15]  P. Minchin,et al.  Quantitative Interpretation of Phloem Translocation Data , 1980 .

[16]  M. Mosley Streamflow generation in a forested watershed, New Zealand , 1979 .

[17]  A. Bath,et al.  A stable isotope study of recharge processes in the English Chalk , 1988 .

[18]  D. Ehhalt,et al.  Soil-water movement and evapotranspiration: Changes in the isotopic composition of the water , 1967 .

[19]  J. Turner,et al.  The mechanisms of catchment flow processes using natural variations in deuterium and oxygen-18 , 1987 .

[20]  J. Webster The hydrologic properties of the forest floor under beech/podocarp/hardwood forest, North Westland , 1977 .