Where is the "theory" within the field of educational technology research?

Critics often characterise the study of educational technology as under‐theorised. To test this assertion and to determine the extent of this criticism, the present paper reports an in‐depth analysis of the 503 most recent empirical articles published in three selected education‐technology‐related journals (Computers & Education; Learning, Media and Technology; and British Journal of Educational Technology). These journals were selected because they publish studies related to all education settings rather than focusing on only a certain segment such as higher education; they have broad geographical catchment; and they were the most highly ranked journals in terms of their 2017 journal citation impact factor. The present paper examines how explicitly existing theory was identified in previous research, how theories were applied and how often these theories were advanced in education technology research. In the majority of cases, explicit engagement with theory was absent. Many studies either were wholly bereft of theories or made vague use of theory. Where theory was explicit, the articles were more likely to use theory to conceptualise the research, to inform the data collection or analysis process and to discuss the results. Very few articles reported findings that help us to learn something new about a particular theory (ie, little evidence of theory advancement). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Fred D. Davis.  A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[2]  C. Reigeluth.  Elaborating the elaboration theory , 1992 .

[3]  Nils Urbach,et al.  Understanding the Why , What , and How of Theories in IS Research 1 , 2017 .

[4]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[5]  Jean Anyon.  Adequate social science, curriculum investigations, and theory , 1982 .

[6]  Maria Hatzigianni,et al.  Using tablets in free play: The implementation of the digital play framework in Greece , 2018, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[7]  Malcolm Tight,et al.  Research into higher education: an a‐theoretical community of practice? , 2004 .

[8]  P. Ashwin.  How often are theories developed through empirical research into higher education? , 2012 .

[9]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Designing organizational interfaces , 1985, CHI '85.

[10]  Cindy Ives,et al.  Instructional-Design Theories and Models, Volume III: Building a Common Knowledge Base (Book Review) , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[11]  Donald P. Ely,et al.  The definition of educational technology: An emerging stability , 1983 .

[12]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  Publishing in AMJ—Part 3: Setting the Hook , 2011 .

[13]  Claudio Violato,et al.  How to Use Structural Equation Modeling in Medical Education Research: A Brief Guide , 2007, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[14]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[15]  Mike Moore,et al.  Editorial: Distance education theory , 1991 .

[16]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[17]  G. Leinhardt,et al.  Going the Distance With Online Education , 2006 .

[18]  Zahide Yildirim,et al.  Investigation of community of inquiry framework in regard to self-regulation, metacognition and motivation , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[20]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[21]  M. Puustinen,et al.  Models of Self-regulated Learning: A review , 2001 .

[22]  Chris Kenyon,et al.  Heutagogy: A Child of Complexity Theory , 2007 .

[23]  Atsushi Makino,et al.  Learning cities in East Asia: Japan, the Republic of Korea and China , 2013 .

[24]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Editor's comments: why top journals accept your paper , 2009 .

[25]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Meng Chang Chen,et al.  The influences of self-regulated learning support and prior knowledge on improving learning performance , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[28]  Michael Henderson,et al.  Examining the use of theory within educational technology and media research , 2013 .

[29]  Lina Markauskaite,et al.  Editorial: e-Research for education: Applied, methodological and critical perspectives , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[30]  Aaron Drummond,et al.  Can an objective measure of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) supplement existing TPACK measures? , 2017, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[31]  L. Czerniewicz,et al.  Theory in learning technology , 2011 .

[32]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Methodological capacity within the field of "educational technology" research: an initial investigation , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[33]  P. Pintrich.  Multiple Goals, Multiple Pathways: The Role of Goal Orientation in Learning and Achievement. , 2000 .

[34]  A. Yuen,et al.  Information and Communication Technology in Educational Policies in the Asian Region , 2018 .

[35]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) , 2009 .

[36]  Flavia Cavazotte,et al.  Explaining university students' effective use of e-learning platforms , 2017, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[37]  K. Ewing.  The Illusion of Wholeness: Culture, Self and the Experience of Inconsistency , 1990 .