On applicability of plate and shell heat exchangers for steam generation in naval PWR

Abstract The pressure on reduction of gas emissions is going to raise the price of fossil fuels and an alternative to fossil fuels is nuclear energy. Naval reactors have some differences from stationary PWR because they have limitations on volume and weight, requiring compact solutions. On the other hand, a source of problems in naval reactors across history is the steam generation function. In order to reduce nuclear containment footprint, it is desirable to employ integral designs, which, however, poses complications and design constraints for recirculation type steam generators, being interesting to employ once through steam generators, whose historic at Babcock & Wilcox is better than recirculation steam generators. Plate and shell heat exchangers are a mature technology made available by many suppliers which allows heat exchange at high temperature and pressure. This work investigates the feasibility of the use of an array of welded plate heat exchangers of a material approved by ASME for pressure barrier (Ti-3Al-2.5V) in a hypothetical naval reactor. It was found it is feasible from thermal-hydraulic point of view and presents advantages over other steam generator designs.

[1]  Stephen R. Turnock,et al.  Concepts for a modular nuclear powered containership , 2013 .

[2]  H. No,et al.  Assessment of straight, zigzag, S-shape, and airfoil PCHEs for intermediate heat exchangers of HTGRs and SFRs , 2014 .

[3]  John R. Thome,et al.  Flow boiling in horizontal flattened tubes: Part I ― Two-phase frictional pressure drop results and model , 2009 .

[4]  J. Corbett,et al.  Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Shipping , 2010 .

[5]  L. S. Tong,et al.  Prediction of departure from nucleate boiling for an axially non-uniform heat flux distribution , 1967 .

[6]  K. Gungor,et al.  A general correlation for flow boiling in tubes and annuli , 1986 .

[7]  John R. Thome,et al.  Entrained liquid fraction prediction in adiabatic and evaporating annular two-phase flow , 2012 .

[8]  J. Thome,et al.  Status of prediction methods for critical heat fluxes in mini and microchannels , 2009 .

[9]  Joel Weisman,et al.  A theoretically based critical heat flux prediction for rod bundles at PWR conditions , 1985 .

[10]  Thomas Dominic Ippolito,et al.  Effects of variation of uranium enrichment on nuclear submarine reactor design , 1990 .

[11]  W. Zhang,et al.  Correlation of critical heat flux for flow boiling of water in mini-channels , 2006 .

[12]  J. Thome,et al.  Saturated flow boiling heat transfer and critical heat flux in small horizontal flattened tubes , 2012 .

[13]  John R. Thome,et al.  Algebraic turbulence modeling in adiabatic and evaporating annular two-phase flow , 2011 .

[14]  N. Todreas,et al.  Hydrodynamic models and correlations for bare and wire-wrapped hexagonal rod bundles — Bundle friction factors, subchannel friction factors and mixing parameters , 1986 .