Efficient mapping of crash risk at intersections with connected vehicle data and deep learning models.

Traditional methods for identifying crash-prone roadways are mainly based on historical crash data. It usually requires more than three years to collect a sufficient amount of dataset for road safety assessment. However, the emerging connected vehicles (CVs) technology generates rich instantaneous information, which can be used to identify dangerous road sections proactively. Information about the identified crash-prone intersections can be shared with the surrounding vehicles via CVs communication technology to promote cautious driving behaviors; in the longer term, such information will guide the implementation of countermeasures to prevent potential crashes. This study proposed a deep-learning based method to predict the risk level at intersections based on CVs data from the Michigan Safety Pilot program and historical traffic and intersection crash data in areas around Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. One month of data by CVs at intersections were used for analyses, which accounts for about 3%-12% of overall trips. The risk levels of 774 intersections (i.e., low, medium and high risk) are determined by the annual crash rates. Feature extraction process is applied to both CV's data and traffic data at each intersection and 24 features are extracted. Two black-box deep-learning models, multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and convolutional neural network (CNN) are trained with the extracted features. A number of hyperparameters that affect prediction performance are fine-tuned using Bayesian optimization algorithm for each model. The performance of the two deep learning models, which are black-box models, were also compared with a decision tree model, a white-box type of simple machine learning model. The results showed that the accuracies of deep learning (DL) models were slightly better (both over 90 %) than the decision tree model (about 87 %). This indicated that the DL models were capable of uncover the inherent complexity from the dataset and therefore provided higher accuracy than the traditional machine learning model. CNN model achieves slightly higher accuracy (93.8 %) and is recommended as the classifier to predict the risk level at intersections in practice. The interpretability analysis of the CNN model is conducted to confirm the validity of the model. This study shows that combination of CVs data (V2V and V2I) and deep learning networks (i.e. MLP and CNN used in this paper) is promising to determine crash risks at intersections with high time efficiency and at low CV penetration rates, which help to deploy countermeasures to reduce the crash rates and resolve traffic safety problems.

[1]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  Derivation and Validation of New Simulation-Based Surrogate Safety Measure , 2008 .

[2]  Yunpeng Wang,et al.  Large-Scale Transportation Network Congestion Evolution Prediction Using Deep Learning Theory , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  Shaw-Pin Miaou,et al.  Modeling Traffic Crash-Flow Relationships for Intersections: Dispersion Parameter, Functional Form, and Bayes Versus Empirical Bayes Methods , 2003 .

[4]  Jeffery Archer,et al.  Indicators for traffic safety assessment and prediction and their application in micro-simulation modelling : a study of urban and suburban intersections , 2005 .

[5]  Mihai Surdeanu,et al.  The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit , 2014, ACL.

[6]  Tara N. Sainath,et al.  Deep Neural Networks for Acoustic Modeling in Speech Recognition: The Shared Views of Four Research Groups , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[7]  Amirfarrokh Iranitalab,et al.  Comparison of four statistical and machine learning methods for crash severity prediction. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  John Hourdos,et al.  Outline for a causal model of traffic conflicts and crashes. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization of Expensive Cost Functions, with Application to Active User Modeling and Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning , 2010, ArXiv.

[10]  Jiajie Hu,et al.  A deep neural network combined with molecular fingerprints (DNN-MF) to develop predictive models for hydroxyl radical rate constants of water contaminants. , 2020, Journal of hazardous materials.

[11]  I. Han,et al.  Characteristic analysis for cognition of dangerous driving using automobile black boxes , 2009 .

[12]  Hong Yang,et al.  Use of real-world connected vehicle data in identifying high-risk locations based on a new surrogate safety measure. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Nicholas G. Polson,et al.  Deep learning for short-term traffic flow prediction , 2016, 1604.04527.

[14]  Sangjae Lee,et al.  Predicting the helpfulness of online reviews using multilayer perceptron neural networks , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Jie Chen,et al.  Driving Safety Risk Prediction Using Cost-Sensitive With Nonnegativity-Constrained Autoencoders Based on Imbalanced Naturalistic Driving Data , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[16]  Giuseppe Guido,et al.  Comparing Safety Performance Measures Obtained from Video Capture Data , 2011 .

[17]  Xuemin Shen,et al.  Connected Vehicles: Solutions and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[18]  Jason Weston,et al.  Natural Language Processing (Almost) from Scratch , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  Jason Weston,et al.  A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning , 2008, ICML '08.

[20]  Eungcheol Kim,et al.  Estimates of Critical Values of Aggressive Acceleration from a Viewpoint of Fuel Consumption and Emissions , 2013 .

[21]  Hong Yang,et al.  SIMULATION-BASED EVALUATION OF TRAFFIC SAFETY PERFORMANCE USING SURROGATE SAFETY MEASURES , 2012 .

[22]  Fei-Yue Wang,et al.  Traffic Flow Prediction With Big Data: A Deep Learning Approach , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[23]  D F Cooper,et al.  TRAFFIC STUDIES AT T-JUNCTIONS. 2. A CONFLICT SIMULATION RECORD , 1976 .

[24]  Flávio Cunto,et al.  Calibration and validation of simulated vehicle safety performance at signalized intersections. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Nicolas Saunier,et al.  Review of current study methods for VRU safety. Appendix 6 – Scoping review: surrogate measures of safety in site-based road traffic observations: Deliverable 2.1 – part 4. , 2016 .

[26]  Jeroen Hogema,et al.  EFFECTS OF INTELLIGENT CRUISE CONTROL ON DRIVING BEHAVIOUR: A SIMULATOR STUDY , 1996 .

[27]  Jie Bao,et al.  A spatiotemporal deep learning approach for citywide short-term crash risk prediction with multi-source data. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Rvd Horst,et al.  TIME-TO-COLLISION AS A CUE FOR DECISION-MAKING IN BRAKING , 1991 .

[29]  Yinhai Wang,et al.  Multistep speed prediction on traffic networks: A deep learning approach considering spatio-temporal dependencies , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[30]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Extracting Useful Information from Basic Safety Message Data: An Empirical Study of Driving Volatility Measures and Crash Frequency at Intersections , 2018, 1803.02433.

[31]  Cong Chen,et al.  Comparing Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Real-Time Crash Prediction , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[32]  Cynthia Rudin,et al.  Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead , 2018, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[33]  Yoon Kim,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification , 2014, EMNLP.

[34]  M. W Gardner,et al.  Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences , 1998 .

[35]  Jasper Snoek,et al.  Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms , 2012, NIPS.

[36]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[37]  Kush R. Varshney,et al.  On the Safety of Machine Learning: Cyber-Physical Systems, Decision Sciences, and Data Products , 2016, Big Data.

[38]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Real-Time Crash Risk Prediction using Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[39]  Jeroen Hogema,et al.  TIME-TO-COLLISION AND COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[40]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[41]  Yan Kuang,et al.  A tree-structured crash surrogate measure for freeways. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[42]  M M Minderhoud,et al.  Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[43]  Jaakko Astola,et al.  Generalized Hampel Filters , 2016, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[44]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  A Life-Cycle Cost-Analysis Approach for Emerging Intelligent Transportation Systems with Connected and Autonomous Vehicles , 2017 .