A detection theory account of change detection.

Previous studies have suggested that visual short-term memory (VSTM) has a storage limit of approximately four items. However, the type of high-threshold (HT) model used to derive this estimate is based on a number of assumptions that have been criticized in other experimental paradigms (e.g., visual search). Here we report findings from nine experiments in which VSTM for color, spatial frequency, and orientation was modeled using a signal detection theory (SDT) approach. In Experiments 1-6, two arrays composed of multiple stimulus elements were presented for 100 ms with a 1500 ms ISI. Observers were asked to report in a yes/no fashion whether there was any difference between the first and second arrays, and to rate their confidence in their response on a 1-4 scale. In Experiments 1-3, only one stimulus element difference could occur (T = 1) while set size was varied. In Experiments 4-6, set size was fixed while the number of stimuli that might change was varied (T = 1, 2, 3, and 4). Three general models were tested against the receiver operating characteristics generated by the six experiments. In addition to the HT model, two SDT models were tried: one assuming summation of signals prior to a decision, the other using a max rule. In Experiments 7-9, observers were asked to directly report the relevant feature attribute of a stimulus presented 1500 ms previously, from an array of varying set size. Overall, the results suggest that observers encode stimuli independently and in parallel, and that performance is limited by internal noise, which is a function of set size.

[1]  M. H. Quenouille Approximate Tests of Correlation in Time‐Series , 1949 .

[2]  Milton Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , 1964 .

[3]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[4]  K. Mardia Statistics of Directional Data , 1972 .

[5]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  D. M. Green,et al.  Detection and recognition. , 1978 .

[7]  Marilyn L Shaw,et al.  Attending to multiple sources of information: I. The integration of information in decision making , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  D. Regan Storage of spatial-frequency information and spatial-frequency discrimination , 1985 .

[9]  J A Swets,et al.  Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: implications for theory and measurement of performance. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  J. Swets Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  J. Palmer Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[14]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  Contrast over-constancy , 1991 .

[15]  M A Georgeson,et al.  Contrast overconstancy. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Stimulus-specific mechanisms of visual short-term memory , 1991, Vision Research.

[17]  M. Greenlee,et al.  Retention and disruption of motion information in visual short-term memory. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  J. Palmer Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect , 1995 .

[19]  J P Thomas,et al.  Parallel processing in visual short-term memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  M. Greenlee,et al.  Competition and sharing of processing resources in visual discrimination. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  The Phenomenology of Attention , 1997, Consciousness and Cognition.

[22]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[23]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Competition and sharing of processing resources in visual discrimination. , 1997 .

[24]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[25]  W Prinzmetal,et al.  The phenomenology of attention. 2. Brightness and contrast. , 1997, Consciousness and cognition.

[26]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[27]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Phenomenology of attention: I. Color, location, orientation, and spatial frequency. , 1998 .

[28]  S Magnussen,et al.  The psychophysics of perceptual memory , 1999, Psychological research.

[29]  S. Magnussen Low-level memory processes in vision , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[30]  J. P. Thomas,et al.  A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  The psychophysics of visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[32]  Ronald A. Rensink Visual Search for Change: A Probe into the Nature of Attentional Processing , 2000 .

[33]  Joel L. Davis,et al.  Visual attention and cortical circuits , 2001 .

[34]  T. Wickens Elementary Signal Detection Theory , 2001 .

[35]  R. Rosenholtz Visual search for orientation among heterogeneous distractors: experimental results and implications for signal-detection theory models of search. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Vyacheslav P. Tuzlukov,et al.  Signal detection theory , 2001 .

[37]  G. Woodman,et al.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual Search Remains Efficient when Visual Working Memory is Full , 2001, Psychological science.

[39]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  P. Verghese Visual Search and Attention A Signal Detection Theory Approach , 2001, Neuron.

[41]  A. Popple,et al.  Set-size effects for spatial frequency change and discrimination in multiple targets. , 2002, Spatial vision.

[42]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  Is visual short-term memory object based? Rejection of the “strong-object” hypothesis , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  J. Wolfe Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Visual transients without feature changes are sufficient for the percept of a change , 2004, Vision Research.

[45]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[46]  D. Luce,et al.  Detection and Recognition " ' , 2006 .