Improving the accuracy in detection of clustered microcalcifications with a context-sensitive classification model.

PURPOSE In computer-aided detection of microcalcifications (MCs), the detection accuracy is often compromised by frequent occurrence of false positives (FPs), which can be attributed to a number of factors, including imaging noise, inhomogeneity in tissue background, linear structures, and artifacts in mammograms. In this study, the authors investigated a unified classification approach for combating the adverse effects of these heterogeneous factors for accurate MC detection. METHODS To accommodate FPs caused by different factors in a mammogram image, the authors developed a classification model to which the input features were adapted according to the image context at a detection location. For this purpose, the input features were defined in two groups, of which one group was derived from the image intensity pattern in a local neighborhood of a detection location, and the other group was used to characterize how a MC is different from its structural background. Owing to the distinctive effect of linear structures in the detector response, the authors introduced a dummy variable into the unified classifier model, which allowed the input features to be adapted according to the image context at a detection location (i.e., presence or absence of linear structures). To suppress the effect of inhomogeneity in tissue background, the input features were extracted from different domains aimed for enhancing MCs in a mammogram image. To demonstrate the flexibility of the proposed approach, the authors implemented the unified classifier model by two widely used machine learning algorithms, namely, a support vector machine (SVM) classifier and an Adaboost classifier. In the experiment, the proposed approach was tested for two representative MC detectors in the literature [difference-of-Gaussians (DoG) detector and SVM detector]. The detection performance was assessed using free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) analysis on a set of 141 screen-film mammogram (SFM) images (66 cases) and a set of 188 full-field digital mammogram (FFDM) images (95 cases). RESULTS The FROC analysis results show that the proposed unified classification approach can significantly improve the detection accuracy of two MC detectors on both SFM and FFDM images. Despite the difference in performance between the two detectors, the unified classifiers can reduce their FP rate to a similar level in the output of the two detectors. In particular, with true-positive rate at 85%, the FP rate on SFM images for the DoG detector was reduced from 1.16 to 0.33 clusters/image (unified SVM) and 0.36 clusters/image (unified Adaboost), respectively; similarly, for the SVM detector, the FP rate was reduced from 0.45 clusters/image to 0.30 clusters/image (unified SVM) and 0.25 clusters/image (unified Adaboost), respectively. Similar FP reduction results were also achieved on FFDM images for the two MC detectors. CONCLUSIONS The proposed unified classification approach can be effective for discriminating MCs from FPs caused by different factors (such as MC-like noise patterns and linear structures) in MC detection. The framework is general and can be applicable for further improving the detection accuracy of existing MC detectors.

[1]  Joachim Dengler,et al.  Segmentation of Microcalcifications in Mammograms , 1991, DAGM-Symposium.

[2]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography , 2007, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[3]  Joachim Dengler,et al.  Segmentation of microcalcifications in mammograms , 1991, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  Ling Guan,et al.  A CAD System for the Automatic Detection of Clustered Microcalcification in Digitized Mammogram Films , 2000, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[5]  Kaja Mohideen,et al.  Automatic Detection of Microcalcification in Mammograms– A Review , 2005 .

[6]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Noise equalization for detection of microcalcification clusters in direct digital mammogram images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1997, EuroCOLT.

[8]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1995, EuroCOLT.

[9]  Siwei Lyu,et al.  Mercer kernels for object recognition with local features , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[10]  R M Nishikawa,et al.  Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: reduction of false-positive clustered microcalcifications using local edge-gradient analysis. , 1995, Medical physics.

[11]  Xavier Lladó,et al.  Automatic microcalcification and cluster detection for digital and digitised mammograms , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[12]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Relevance vector machine for automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  K Doi,et al.  Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. , 1987, Medical physics.

[14]  Shaogang Gong,et al.  Support vector machine based multi-view face detection and recognition , 2004, Image Vis. Comput..

[15]  Gwo Giun Lee,et al.  On Digital Mammogram Segmentation and Microcalcification Detection Using Multiresolution Wavelet Analysis , 1997, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[16]  A Bazzani,et al.  An SVM classifier to separate false signals from microcalcifications in digital mammograms , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Normalization of local contrast in mammograms , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Robin N. Strickland,et al.  Wavelet transforms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[19]  K L Lam,et al.  Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network. , 1995, Medical physics.

[20]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[21]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Stochastic model for automated detection of calcifications in digital mammograms , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[22]  G E Gigante,et al.  A new kernel method for microcalcification detection: Spin Glass-Markov Random Fields. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[23]  Alessandro Sperduti,et al.  Discretizing Continuous Attributes in AdaBoost for Text Categorization , 2003, ECIR.

[24]  J. I. Arribas,et al.  A Comparative Study on Microcalcification Detection Methods with Posterior Probability Estimation based on Gaussian Mixture Models , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[25]  R. Zwiggelaar,et al.  The benefit of knowing your linear structures in mammographic images , 2002 .

[26]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Detection of clustered microcalcifications using spatial point process modeling , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[27]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2015 , 2015, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[28]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Linear structures in mammographic images: detection and classification , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Nikolas P. Galatsanos,et al.  A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  Hui Zhao,et al.  False-positive reduction using RANSAC in mammography microcalcification detection , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[31]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[32]  R. Ansari,et al.  Detection of microcalcifications in mammograms using higher order statistics , 1997, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[33]  Cheng-Lin Liu,et al.  Handwritten digit recognition: benchmarking of state-of-the-art techniques , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[34]  Thierry Bertin-Mahieux,et al.  Automatic Generation of Social Tags for Music Recommendation , 2007, NIPS.