Distinct methylation profiles characterize fusion-positive and fusion-negative rhabdomyosarcoma

Rhabdomyosarcoma comprises two major subtypes, fusion positive (PAX3–FOXO1 or PAX7–FOXO1) and fusion negative. To investigate the significance of DNA methylation in these subtypes, we analyzed methylation profiles of 37 rhabdomyosarcoma tumors and 10 rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines, as well as 8 normal tissues. Unsupervised clustering of DNA methylation clearly distinguished the fusion-positive and fusion-negative subsets. The fusion-positive tumors showed substantially lower overall levels of methylation compared with fusion-negative tumors. Comparison with the methylation pattern of normal skeletal muscle and bone marrow indicates that fusion-negative rhabdomyosarcoma is more similar to these normal tissues compared with fusion-positive rhabdomyosarcoma, and suggests that many of the methylation differences between these subtypes arise from ‘aberrant’ hyper- and hypomethylation events in fusion-positive rhabdomyosarcoma. Integrative methylation and gene expression analysis revealed that methylation differences between fusion-positive and fusion-negative tumors could either be positively or negatively associated with mRNA expression. There was no significant difference in the distribution of PAX3–FOXO1-binding sites between genes with and without differential methylation. However, the finding that PAX3–FOXO1-binding sites were enriched among genes that were both differentially methylated and differentially expressed suggests that the fusion protein interacts with DNA methylation to regulate target gene expression. An 11-gene DNA methylation signature, classifying the rhabdomyosarcoma tumors into fusion-positive and fusion-negative subsets, was established and validated by pyrosequencing assays. Notably, EMILIN1 (part of the 11-gene signature) showed higher methylation and lower mRNA expression in fusion-positive compared with fusion-negative tumors, and demonstrated demethylation and re-expression in multiple fusion-positive cell lines after treatment with 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that fusion-positive and fusion-negative rhabdomyosarcoma tumors possess characteristic methylation profiles that contribute to the expression differences between these fusion subtypes. These findings indicate an important relationship between fusion status and epigenetic changes in rhabdomyosarcoma, present a novel approach for ascertaining fusion status, and may identify new therapeutic targets in rhabdomyosarcoma.

[1]  R. Arceci Fusion Gene–Negative Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma Is Clinically and Molecularly Indistinguishable From Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcoma , 2010 .

[2]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[3]  I. Campbell,et al.  The Solution Structure of EMILIN1 Globular C1q Domain Reveals a Disordered Insertion Necessary for Interaction with the α4β1 Integrin* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  Allen D. Delaney,et al.  Conserved Role of Intragenic DNA Methylation in Regulating Alternative Promoters , 2010, Nature.

[5]  Lynette M. Smith,et al.  Examination of gene fusion status in archival samples of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma entered on the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-III trial: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. , 2006, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[6]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  J. Graff,et al.  A mouse model of rhabdomyosarcoma originating from the adipocyte lineage. , 2012, Cancer cell.

[8]  F. Barr,et al.  Classification of Rhabdomyosarcoma and Its Molecular Basis , 2013, Advances in Anatomic Pathology.

[9]  G. Satten,et al.  Age-associated DNA methylation in pediatric populations. , 2012, Genome research.

[10]  A. Olshen,et al.  Global gene expression profiling of PAX‐FKHR fusion‐positive alveolar and PAX‐FKHR fusion‐negative embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas , 2007, The Journal of pathology.

[11]  R. Arceci PAX3/FOXO1 Fusion Gene Status Is the Key Prognostic Molecular Marker in Rhabdomyosarcoma and Significantly Improves Current Risk Stratification , 2012 .

[12]  James R. Anderson,et al.  PAX‐FOXO1 fusion status drives unfavorable outcome for children with rhabdomyosarcoma: A children's oncology group report , 2013, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[13]  A. Wagers,et al.  Muscling in: Uncovering the origins of rhabdomyosarcoma , 2010, Nature Medicine.

[14]  Carla Danussi,et al.  EMILIN1/α9β1 Integrin Interaction Is Crucial in Lymphatic Valve Formation and Maintenance , 2013, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[15]  Benjamin R Arenkiel,et al.  Evidence for an unanticipated relationship between undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. , 2011, Cancer cell.

[16]  P. Meltzer,et al.  Genome-wide methylation patterns in papillary thyroid cancer are distinct based on histological subtype and tumor genotype. , 2014, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[17]  R. Arceci,et al.  Gene Expression Signatures Identify Rhabdomyosarcoma Subtypes and Detect a Novel t(2;2)(q35;p23) Translocation Fusing PAX3 to NCOA1 , 2006 .

[18]  Carla Danussi,et al.  An EMILIN1-Negative Microenvironment Promotes Tumor Cell Proliferation and Lymph Node Invasion , 2012, Cancer Prevention Research.

[19]  Gangning Liang,et al.  Gene body methylation can alter gene expression and is a therapeutic target in cancer. , 2014, Cancer cell.

[20]  G. Getz,et al.  Comprehensive genomic analysis of rhabdomyosarcoma reveals a landscape of alterations affecting a common genetic axis in fusion-positive and fusion-negative tumors. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[21]  Xiao Zhang,et al.  Comparison of Beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[22]  P. Meltzer,et al.  Lineage of origin in rhabdomyosarcoma informs pharmacological response , 2014, Genes & development.

[23]  C. R. Pinkerton,et al.  Comparative phenotypes in rhabdomyosarcomas and developing skeletal muscle , 1990, Histopathology.

[24]  Kenichi Harada,et al.  Aberrant promoter methylation and silencing of the RASSF1A gene in pediatric tumors and cell lines , 2002, Oncogene.

[25]  Richard Pazdur,et al.  FDA drug approval summary: azacitidine (5-azacytidine, Vidaza) for injectable suspension. , 2005, The oncologist.

[26]  Heather L. Mulder,et al.  Targeting oxidative stress in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. , 2013, Cancer cell.

[27]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[28]  A. Lazar,et al.  PAX3/7–FOXO1 fusion status in older rhabdomyosarcoma patient population by fluorescent in situ hybridization , 2012, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[29]  Stephen X Skapek,et al.  Myogenin, AP2&bgr;, NOS-1, and HMGA2 Are Surrogate Markers of Fusion Status in Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report From the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children’s Oncology Group , 2014, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[30]  P. Meltzer,et al.  Genome-wide identification of PAX3-FKHR binding sites in rhabdomyosarcoma reveals candidate target genes important for development and cancer. , 2011, Cancer research.

[31]  P. Laird,et al.  Low-level processing of Illumina Infinium DNA Methylation BeadArrays , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  DNA Methylation Alterations Exhibit Intraindividual Stability and Interindividual Heterogeneity in Prostate Cancer Metastases , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[33]  Aberrant methylation of the HIC1 promoter is a frequent event in specific pediatric neoplasms. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[34]  Rafael A. Irizarry,et al.  A framework for oligonucleotide microarray preprocessing , 2010, Bioinform..

[35]  Dario Strbenac,et al.  Regional activation of the cancer genome by long-range epigenetic remodeling. , 2013, Cancer cell.

[36]  P. Sorensen,et al.  Molecular classification of rhabdomyosarcoma--genotypic and phenotypic determinants of diagnosis: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. , 2009, The American journal of pathology.

[37]  Zizhen Yao,et al.  Genome-wide DNA methylation studies suggest distinct DNA methylation patterns in pediatric embryonal and alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas , 2012, Epigenetics.

[38]  E. Schuuring,et al.  Genome-wide promoter analysis uncovers portions of the cancer methylome. , 2008, Cancer research.