DEM study of mechanical characteristics of multi-spherical and superquadric particles at micro and macro scales

Abstract Multi-spheres and Superquadrics are popular approaches for addressing particle shape effect in the Discrete Element Method (DEM). This study focuses on the mechanical characteristics of cubical particles, modeled by the two methods (using EDEM and LIGGGHTS), through conducting a series of numerical case studies at both single particle and bulk levels. In the first part of the study, several testing scenarios, which clarify the impact, interlocking, sliding and tilting characteristics of the particle, are discussed and the respective simulations are carried out. The results emphasize the importance of surface bumpiness and edge sharpness in the single-particle behaviour and are used for informing the bulk response. Further, role of the two shape descriptors on bulk response is evaluated in angle of repose, Jenike shear and silo flow simulations. The results of these tests are assessed both at the micro, directly through DEM outputs, and at the meso- and macro-scales, using a coarse graining technique. It is seen that the properties of edge and surface in superquadric and multi-sphere particles considerably influence the heap profile in the angle of repose test. However, in a Jenike direct shear, the shape complexity only significantly affects the shear strength, porosity and mode of motion when the packing is dense. Additionally, in silo discharge, the effect of shape features is even less on the flow pattern and mass flow rate but is found to have a significant influence on the stress distribution.

[1]  Stefan Pirker,et al.  Efficient implementation of superquadric particles in Discrete Element Method within an open-source framework , 2017, CPM 2017.

[2]  John R. Williams,et al.  SUPERQUADRICS AND MODAL DYNAMICS FOR DISCRETE ELEMENTS IN INTERACTIVE DESIGN , 1992 .

[3]  Simona Ronchi Della Rocca,et al.  λ Δ -Models , 2004 .

[4]  Harald Kruggel-Emden,et al.  A study on tangential force laws applicable to the discrete element method (DEM) for materials with viscoelastic or plastic behavior , 2008 .

[5]  Rui Xiao,et al.  Discrete element method modeling of non-spherical granular flow in rectangular hopper , 2010 .

[6]  Christopher M. Wensrich,et al.  Rolling friction as a technique for modelling particle shape in DEM , 2012 .

[7]  Siegmar Wirtz,et al.  A numerical study on the influence of particle shape on hopper discharge within the polyhedral and multi-sphere discrete element method , 2012 .

[8]  Mohammad Hossein Abbaspour-Fard Discrete element modelling of the dynamic behaviour of non-spherical particulate materials , 2000 .

[9]  D. Wood Soil Behaviour and Critical State Soil Mechanics , 1991 .

[10]  Jin Y. Ooi,et al.  Numerical investigation of progressive development of granular pile with spherical and non-spherical particles , 2009 .

[11]  I. Goldhirsch,et al.  Stress, stress asymmetry and couple stress: from discrete particles to continuous fields , 2010 .

[12]  S. Luding,et al.  Influence of coarse-graining parameters on the analysis of DEM simulations of silo flow , 2016 .

[13]  Colin Thornton,et al.  A numerical examination of the direct shear test , 2007 .

[14]  J. van de Velde,et al.  The flow of granular solids through orifices , 1961 .

[15]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[16]  R. T. Fowler,et al.  The flow of granular solids through orifices , 1959 .

[17]  Takashi Matsushima Discrete Element Modeling for Irregularly-shaped Sand Grains , 2002 .

[18]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  Large scale industrial DEM modelling , 2004 .

[19]  R. D. Mindlin Elastic Spheres in Contact Under Varying Oblique Forces , 1953 .

[20]  Jian Fei Chen,et al.  Assessment of rolling resistance models in discrete element simulations , 2011 .

[21]  C. Kloss,et al.  Models, algorithms and validation for opensource DEM and CFD-DEM , 2012 .

[22]  Ali Asghar Mirghasemi,et al.  Numerical simulation of 3D semi-real-shaped granular particle assembly , 2012 .

[23]  Barr,et al.  Superquadrics and Angle-Preserving Transformations , 1981, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[24]  Jennifer S. Curtis,et al.  Force model considerations for glued-sphere discrete element method simulations , 2009 .

[25]  Harald Kruggel-Emden,et al.  A study on the validity of the multi-sphere Discrete Element Method , 2008 .

[26]  L. Vu-Quoc,et al.  A 3-D discrete-element method for dry granular flows of ellipsoidal particles , 2000 .

[27]  Paul W. Cleary,et al.  DEM modelling of industrial granular flows: 3D case studies and the effect of particle shape on hopper discharge , 2002 .

[28]  Aibing Yu,et al.  DEM/CFD-DEM Modelling of Non-spherical Particulate Systems: Theoretical Developments and Applications , 2016 .

[29]  Spahn,et al.  Model for collisions in granular gases. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[30]  Siegmar Wirtz,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation on the influence of particle shape and shape approximation on hopper discharge using the discrete element method , 2013 .

[31]  R. Kačianauskas,et al.  Investigation of adequacy of multi-sphere approximation of elliptical particles for DEM simulations , 2010 .

[32]  Mohammad Hossein Abbaspour-Fard,et al.  Shape representation of axi‐symmetrical, non‐spherical particles in discrete element simulation using multi‐element model particles , 1999 .

[33]  Jin Y. Ooi,et al.  Numerical investigation of particle shape and particle friction on limiting bulk friction in direct shear tests and comparison with experiments , 2011 .

[34]  Harald Kruggel-Emden,et al.  Comparison of the multi-sphere and polyhedral approach to simulate non-spherical particles within the discrete element method: Influence on temporal force evolution for multiple contacts , 2011 .

[35]  A. Kwade,et al.  Calibration and interpretation of DEM parameters for simulations of cylindrical tablets with multi-sphere approach , 2018 .

[36]  Jin Y. Ooi,et al.  Comparison of multi-sphere and superquadric particle representation for modelling shearing and flow characteristics of granular assemblies , 2017 .

[37]  Martin Kremmer,et al.  A method for representing boundaries in discrete element modelling—part I: Geometry and contact detection , 2001 .

[38]  O. Cinicioglu,et al.  Determination of active failure surface geometry for cohesionless backfills , 2017 .

[39]  Hamza Ouafdel Numerical simulations of granular assemblies with three-dimensional ellipsoid-shaped particles , 1998 .

[40]  Feras Y. Fraige,et al.  Distinct element modelling of cubic particle packing and flow , 2008 .

[41]  P. Cleary,et al.  Segregation due to particle shape of a granular mixture in a slowly rotating tumbler , 2017 .

[42]  R. Hayward Stress , 2005, The Lancet.

[43]  F. Maio,et al.  Comparison of contact-force models for the simulation of collisions in DEM-based granular flow codes , 2004 .