Sensitivity of Aerosol Distribution and Climate Response to Stratospheric SO2 Injection Locations

Injection of SO_2 into the stratosphere has been proposed as a method to, in part, counteract anthropogenic climate change. So far, most studies investigated injections at the equator or in a region in the tropics. Here we use Community Earth System Model version 1 Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (CESM1(WACCM)) to explore the impact of continuous single grid point SO_2 injections at seven different latitudes and two altitudes in the stratosphere on aerosol distribution and climate. For each of the 14 locations, 3 different constant SO_2 emission rates were tested to identify linearity in aerosol burden, aerosol optical depth, and climate effects. We found that injections at 15°N and 15°S and at 25 km altitude have equal or greater effect on radiation and surface temperature than injections at the equator. Nonequatorial injections transport SO_2 and sulfate aerosols more efficiently into middle and high latitudes and result in particles of smaller effective radius and larger aerosol burden in middle and high latitudes. Injections at 15°S produce the largest increase in global average aerosol optical depth and increase the change in radiative forcing per Tg SO_2/yr by about 15% compared to equatorial injections. High-altitude injections at 15°N produce the largest reduction in global average temperature of 0.2° per Tg S/yr for the last 7 years of a 10 year experiment. Injections at higher altitude are generally more efficient at reducing surface temperature, with the exception of large equatorial injections of at least 12 Tg SO_2/yr. These findings have important implications for designing a strategy to counteract global climate change.

[1]  Rolando R. Garcia,et al.  Modification of the Gravity Wave Parameterization in the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model: Motivation and Results , 2017 .

[2]  P. Crutzen Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? , 2006 .

[3]  Jean-Francois Lamarque,et al.  A new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment designed for climate and chemistry models , 2014 .

[4]  Georgiy L. Stenchikov,et al.  Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections , 2008 .

[5]  D. Weisenstein,et al.  Efficient formation of stratospheric aerosol for climate engineering by emission of condensible vapor from aircraft , 2010 .

[6]  J. Kay,et al.  Can regional climate engineering save the summer Arctic sea ice? , 2014 .

[7]  Early growth dynamical implications for the steerability of stratospheric solar radiation management via sulfur aerosol particles , 2016 .

[8]  K.,et al.  The Community Earth System Model (CESM) large ensemble project: a community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variability , 2015 .

[9]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Radiative and Chemical Response to Interactive Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols in Fully Coupled CESM1(WACCM) , 2017 .

[10]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  Impact of geoengineered aerosols on the troposphere and stratosphere , 2009 .

[11]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? An Editorial Essay , 2016 .

[12]  R. Hommel,et al.  Modelling the size distribution of geoengineered stratospheric aerosols , 2011 .

[13]  L. Emmons,et al.  The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions , 2012 .

[14]  M. Mills,et al.  The Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be Tailored Using Multiple Injection Locations , 2017 .

[15]  Douglas G. MacMartin,et al.  First Simulations of Designing Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering to Meet Multiple Simultaneous Climate Objectives , 2017 .

[16]  O. Uchino,et al.  Long‐term variation of stratospheric aerosols observed with lidars over Tsukuba, Japan, from 1982 and Lauder, New Zealand, from 1992 to 2015 , 2016 .

[17]  C. Bitz,et al.  Inability of stratospheric sulfate aerosol injections to preserve the West Antarctic Ice Sheet , 2015 .

[18]  Valentina Aquila,et al.  Sulfate geoengineering: a review of the factors controlling the needed injection of sulfur dioxide , 2016 .

[19]  Luke D. Oman,et al.  Modifications of the quasi‐biennial oscillation by a geoengineering perturbation of the stratospheric aerosol layer , 2014 .

[20]  R. Ferrari,et al.  Transformed Eulerian-Mean Theory. Part I: Nonquasigeostrophic Theory for Eddies on a Zonal-Mean Flow , 2005 .

[21]  J. M. English,et al.  Microphysical simulations of sulfur burdens from stratospheric sulfur geoengineering , 2012 .

[22]  K. Calvin,et al.  The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300 , 2011 .

[23]  R. Neale,et al.  The Mean Climate of the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM4) in Forced SST and Fully Coupled Experiments , 2013 .

[24]  C. Timmreck,et al.  The dependency of geoengineered sulfate aerosol on the emission strategy , 2011 .

[25]  M. Mills,et al.  Stratospheric Dynamical Response and Ozone Feedbacks in the Presence of SO2 Injections , 2017 .

[26]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  Exploring the geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulfate aerosols: The role of particle size , 2008 .

[27]  Shingo Watanabe,et al.  The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2013 .

[28]  N. Butchart The Brewer‐Dobson circulation , 2014 .

[29]  A. Schmidt,et al.  Global volcanic aerosol properties derived from emissions, 1990–2014, using CESM1(WACCM) , 2016 .

[30]  Harri Kokkola,et al.  Radiative and climate effects of stratospheric sulfur geoengineering using seasonally varying injection areas , 2017 .

[31]  V. Aquila,et al.  Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2014 .

[32]  Ulrike Niemeier,et al.  What is the limit of climate engineering by stratospheric injection of SO 2 , 2015 .

[33]  R. Garcia,et al.  Acceleration of the Brewer–Dobson Circulation due to Increases in Greenhouse Gases , 2008 .

[34]  R. Nemani,et al.  Albedo enhancement of marine clouds to counteract global warming: impacts on the hydrological cycle , 2011 .

[35]  V. Aquila,et al.  Correction to “Dispersion of the volcanic sulfate cloud from a Mount Pinatubo‐like eruption” , 2013 .

[36]  E. Shuckburgh,et al.  Influence of the quasi‐biennial oscillation on isentropic transport and mixing in the tropics and subtropics , 2001 .

[37]  Andrew S. Jones,et al.  Asymmetric forcing from stratospheric aerosols impacts Sahelian rainfall , 2013 .

[38]  G. Pitari,et al.  Stratospheric Aerosols from Major Volcanic Eruptions: A Composition-Climate Model Study of the Aerosol Cloud Dispersal and e-folding Time , 2016 .

[39]  Andrea Stenke,et al.  Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) , 2017 .

[40]  D. Weisenstein,et al.  The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone , 2009 .

[41]  Daniel R. Marsh,et al.  Climate change from 1850 to 2005 simulated in CESM1(WACCM) , 2013 .