Providing line-of-sight in a free-space-optics based data center architecture

To overcome the shortcomings of traditional static (wired) data center architectures, we recently proposed FireFly, a fully-flexible and fully-wireless data center network fabric based on free space optical (FSO) links. To facilitate a clear line-of-sight between the FSO devices placed on racks, FireFly uses a full-ceiling mirror for beam redirection. Use of a full-ceiling mirror imposes significant operational and infrastructural challenge and expense. The focus of our paper is to propose and evaluate alternative schemes to provide line-of-sight for FSO links in FireFly. In particular, we propose two schemes: (i) strategically placed multiple but small overhead mirrors, and (2) “towers” on top of racks, on which FSOs can be placed at regular heights. We develop comprehensive techniques for the above suggested schemes, and demonstrate the viability of these schemes by evaluating their performance using simulations for various performance metrics of interest.

[1]  Charles Clos,et al.  A study of non-blocking switching networks , 1953 .

[2]  Amin Vahdat,et al.  Optics in data center network architecture , 2012 .

[3]  Hong Liu,et al.  Energy proportional datacenter networks , 2010, ISCA.

[4]  Konstantina Papagiannaki,et al.  c-Through: part-time optics in data centers , 2010, SIGCOMM '10.

[5]  Frits C. R. Spieksma,et al.  Approximation Algorithms for Rectangle Stabbing and Interval Stabbing Problems , 2004, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[6]  Debbie Kedar,et al.  Urban optical wireless communication networks: the main challenges and possible solutions , 2004, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Jeffrey C. Mogul,et al.  Taming the Flying Cable Monster: A Topology Design and Optimization Framework for Data-Center Networks , 2011, USENIX ATC.

[8]  Luiz André Barroso,et al.  The Case for Energy-Proportional Computing , 2007, Computer.

[9]  Alejandro López-Ortiz,et al.  LEGUP: using heterogeneity to reduce the cost of data center network upgrades , 2010, CoNEXT.

[10]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  Mirror mirror on the ceiling: flexible wireless links for data centers , 2012, CCRV.

[11]  Amin Vahdat,et al.  PortLand: a scalable fault-tolerant layer 2 data center network fabric , 2009, SIGCOMM '09.

[12]  Ankit Singla,et al.  OSA: An Optical Switching Architecture for Data Center Networks With Unprecedented Flexibility , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[13]  Atul Singh,et al.  Proteus: a topology malleable data center network , 2010, Hotnets-IX.

[14]  Ion Stoica,et al.  A cost comparison of datacenter network architectures , 2010, CoNEXT.

[15]  Albert G. Greenberg,et al.  VL2: a scalable and flexible data center network , 2009, SIGCOMM '09.

[16]  Himanshu Shah,et al.  FireFly , 2014, SIGCOMM.

[17]  Ankit Singla,et al.  Jellyfish: Networking Data Centers Randomly , 2011, NSDI.

[18]  Amin Vahdat,et al.  A scalable, commodity data center network architecture , 2008, SIGCOMM '08.

[19]  Mohammad Alizadeh,et al.  On the Data Path Performance of Leaf-Spine Datacenter Fabrics , 2013, 2013 IEEE 21st Annual Symposium on High-Performance Interconnects.

[20]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  Augmenting data center networks with multi-gigabit wireless links , 2011, SIGCOMM.

[21]  Sujata Banerjee,et al.  ElasticTree: Saving Energy in Data Center Networks , 2010, NSDI.