Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project

The common understanding of design science research in information systems (DSRIS) continues to evolve. Only in the broadest terms has there been consensus: that DSRIS involves, in some way, learning through the act of building. However, what is to be built – the definition of the DSRIS artifact – and how it is to be built – the methodology of DSRIS – has drawn increasing discussion in recent years. The relationship of DSRIS to theory continues to make up a significant part of the discussion: how theory should inform DSRIS and whether or not DSRIS can or should be instrumental in developing and refining theory. In this paper, we present the exegesis of a DSRIS research project in which creating a (prescriptive) design theory through the process of developing and testing an information systems artifact is inextricably bound to the testing and refinement of its kernel theory.

[1]  Lawrence B. Holder,et al.  Graph-Based Analysis of Human Transfer Learning Using a Game Testbed , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[2]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial - 3rd Edition , 1981 .

[3]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  So, Talk to Me: The Effect of Explicit Goals on the Comprehension of Business Process Narratives , 2006, MIS Q..

[4]  Marta Indulska,et al.  How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? , 2006, Data Knowl. Eng..

[5]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Design Research in the Technology of Information Systems: Truth or Dare , 2002 .

[6]  Surya B. Yadav,et al.  The process of research investigations in artificial intelligence-a unified view , 1995, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[8]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Dimensions of information systems design: A framework for a long-range research program , 1986, Inf. Syst..

[9]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Representing and Using Nonfunctional Requirements: A Process-Oriented Approach , 1992, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[10]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  Imre Lakatos,et al.  The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1978 .

[12]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  The Aggregate General Design Cycle as a Perspective on the Evolution of Computing Communities of Interest , 2005 .

[13]  O. Gotel,et al.  Contribution Structures , 1995 .

[14]  I. Ajzen.  Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction. , 1977 .

[15]  Janice Singer,et al.  How software engineers use documentation: the state of the practice , 2003, IEEE Software.

[16]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  Managing Multiple Requirements Perspectives with Metamodels , 1996, IEEE Softw..

[17]  Karl R. Popper,et al.  Science : Conjectures and Refutations , 2005 .

[18]  John R. Venable,et al.  The role of theory and theorising in Design Science research , 2006 .

[19]  Sara Jones,et al.  Generating requirements from systems models using patterns: a case study , 2005, Requirements Engineering.

[20]  Anneliese Amschler Andrews,et al.  Program understanding behavior during corrective maintenance of large-scale software , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  D. Lewalter.  Cognitive Strategies for Learning from Static and Dynamic Visuals , 2003 .

[22]  A. Pepitone,et al.  Social roles and strategies in prediction: Some determinants of the use of base-rate information. , 1984 .

[23]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[24]  Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite,et al.  A Framework for Integrating Non-Functional Requirements into Conceptual Models , 2001, Requirements Engineering.

[25]  Olly Gotel,et al.  Contribution structures [Requirements artifacts] , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'95).

[26]  Jeffrey Parsons,et al.  What do the pictures mean? Guidelines for experimental evaluation of representation fidelity in diagrammatical conceptual modeling techniques , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[27]  Paul Veerkamp,et al.  Modeling Design Process , 1990, AI Mag..

[28]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology , 2007 .

[29]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Research in Information Systems , 2010 .

[30]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Special Issue on Intensive Research in Information Systems: Using Qualitative, Interpretive, and Case Methods to Study Information Technology-Third Installment; Foreword , 2000, MIS Q..

[31]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Understanding "why" in software process modelling, analysis, and design , 1994, Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[32]  Donald C. Gause,et al.  Why Context Matters--And What Can We Do about It? , 2005, IEEE Softw..

[33]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Christian Stefansen,et al.  Using soft constraints to guide users in flexible business process management systems , 2008, Int. J. Bus. Process. Integr. Manag..

[35]  E. D. Klemke,et al.  Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science , 1988 .

[36]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  The emergence of design research in information systems in North America , 2008 .

[37]  Gerardo Canfora,et al.  A Design Rationale Based Environment for Cooperative Maintenance , 2000, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng..

[38]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  DESIGN THEORIES IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS - A NEED FOR MULTI-GROUNDING , 2004 .

[39]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[40]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures , 1978 .

[41]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[43]  John R. Venable,et al.  A framework for Design Science research activities , 2006 .

[44]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[45]  Ron Weber,et al.  Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  William Bechtel,et al.  Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science , 1989 .

[48]  J. Shanteau,et al.  An information processing view of framing effects: The role of causal schemas in decision making , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[49]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Artifact as theory-nexus: hermeneutics meets theory-based design , 1989, CHI '89.

[50]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Roland Brünken,et al.  The impact of intrinsic cognitive load on the effectiveness of graphical help for coherence formation , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  Stephen Fickas,et al.  Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in the Design of Composite Systems , 1992, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[53]  E. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of motivation and cognition : foundations of social behavior , 1991 .

[54]  Kay M. Nelson,et al.  Understanding Software Operations Support Expertise: A Revealed Causal Mapping Approach , 2000, MIS Q..

[55]  Eric S. K. Yu,et al.  Models for supporting the redesign of organizational work , 1995, COCS '95.

[56]  Richard E Mayer,et al.  The case for coherence in scientific explanations: quantitative details can hurt qualitative understanding. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[57]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[58]  S. Dasgupta.  Technology and Creativity , 2006, Woman with a Movie Camera.

[59]  Omar A. El Sawy,et al.  Assessing Information System Design Theory in Perspective: How Useful Was our 1992 Initial Rendition? , 2004 .

[60]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..