Tactical Reconnaissance Using Groups of Partly Autonomous UGVs

This paper investigates how one operator can control a multi-robot system for tactical reconnaissance using partly autonomous UGVs. Instead of controlling individual UGVs, the operator uses supervisory control to allocate partly autonomous UGVs into suitable groups and define areas for search. A state-of-the-art pursuit-evasion algorithm then performed the detailed control of available UGVs. The supervisory control was evaluated by allowing subjects to control either six or twelve UGVs for tactical reconnaissance along the route of advance for a convoy traveling through an urban environment with mobile threats. The results show that increasing the number of UGVs improve the subjects situation awareness, increase the number of threats that are detected, and reduce the number of hits on the convoy. More importantly, these benefits were achieved without any increase in mental workload. The results support the common belief in autonomous functions as an approach to reduce the operator-to-vehicle ratio in military applications.

[1]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[2]  Michael Lewis,et al.  Human control for cooperating robot teams , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[3]  Jacob W. Crandall,et al.  A Predictive Model for Human-Unmanned Vehicle Systems : Final Report , 2008 .

[4]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Task Switching and Multi-Robot Teams , 2005 .

[5]  Jacob W. Crandall,et al.  Predictive Model for Human-Unmanned Vehicle Systems , 2009, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[6]  Bonnie M. Muir,et al.  Trust in automation. I: Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems , 1994 .

[7]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[8]  Peter Svenmarck,et al.  Operating Multiple Semi-autonomous UGVs: Navigation, Strategies, and Instantaneous Performance , 2007, HCI.

[9]  Hiroshi Furukawa,et al.  A flexible delegation-type interface enhances system performance in human supervision of multiple robots: empirical studies with RoboFlag , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[10]  Roger A. Chadwick Operating Multiple Semi-Autonomous Robots: Monitoring, Responding, Detecting , 2006 .

[11]  Pedro U. Lima,et al.  Multi-Robot Systems , 2005, Innovations in Robot Mobility and Control.

[12]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Validating human-robot interaction schemes in multitasking environments , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[13]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2005 .

[14]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[15]  Lynne E. Parker,et al.  Multi-Robot Systems: From Swarms to Intelligent Automata , 2002, Springer Netherlands.

[16]  Bonnie M. Muir,et al.  Trust Between Humans and Machines, and the Design of Decision Aids , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[17]  Christopher M. Schlick,et al.  A Comparative Study of Multimodal Displays for Multirobot Supervisory Control , 2007, HCI.

[18]  Michael Lewis,et al.  Assessing cooperation in human control of heterogeneous robots , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[19]  Geoffrey A. Hollinger,et al.  Probabilistic Strategies for Pursuit in Cluttered Environments with Multiple Robots , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  N. Moray,et al.  Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. , 1996, Ergonomics.