New centrality measures for assessing smart grid vulnerabilities and predicting brownouts and blackouts

This paper proposes mathematical models based on the electrical properties of smart grids for conducting vulnerability analyses and predicting brownouts and blackouts. Definitions of pseudo-Laplacian, pseudo-adjacency and pseudo-degree matrices for smart grids are introduced to specify new centrality measures with electrical interpretations. The centrality measures are used to rank the relative importance of nodes (e.g., generating stations or substations) and edges (e.g., transmission lines or buses) of a graph corresponding to a power grid network and to assess the overall vulnerability of the network. The reliability of using the centrality measures to predict brownouts and blackouts is demonstrated in the face of random and targeted attacks. Monte-Carlo simulations are used to analyze attacks on smart grid networks and to assess the performance of the centrality measures. The simulations employ the IEEE 30-bus, IEEE 57-bus and IEEE 300-bus networks as well as the WSCC 4941-bus real power grid. Every scenario in the Monte-Carlo simulations involves the removal of a subset of buses and performing a complete nonlinear Newton-Raphson power flow analysis to compute the power traffic matrix and the corresponding centrality. The Monte-Carlo simulations conclusively demonstrate that electrical centrality measures based on the power traffic matrix are reliable indicators of the total unsatisfied load ratio (i.e., the load taken offline due to an attack divided by the total load demand). A key result is that, if the total centrality score of the removed buses exceeds a threshold estimated via Monte-Carlo simulation, then a sudden and dramatic jump to a blackout situation is ensured.

[1]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality , 2006, Soc. Networks.

[2]  Chao Yang,et al.  Identification of severe multiple contingencies in electric power networks , 2005, Proceedings of the 37th Annual North American Power Symposium, 2005..

[3]  A. V. Meier Electric power systems : a conceptual introduction , 2006 .

[4]  Peter F. Stadler,et al.  Laplacian Eigenvectors of Graphs , 2007 .

[5]  Luca Podofillini,et al.  A combination of Monte Carlo simulation and cellular automata for computing the availability of complex network systems , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Fei Xue,et al.  Analysis of structural vulnerabilities in power transmission grids , 2009, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..

[7]  Anna Scaglione,et al.  Electrical centrality measures for electric power grid vulnerability analysis , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[8]  S. Dowdy,et al.  Statistics for Research , 1983 .

[9]  V. Latora,et al.  Efficiency of scale-free networks: error and attack tolerance , 2002, cond-mat/0205601.

[10]  Seth Blumsack,et al.  A Centrality Measure for Electrical Networks , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[11]  Pak Chung Wong,et al.  A novel application of parallel betweenness centrality to power grid contingency analysis , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing (IPDPS).

[12]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Randomized flow model and centrality measure for electrical power transmission network analysis , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Ali Pinar,et al.  Contingency-Risk Informed Power System Design , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Pasquale De Meo,et al.  A Novel Measure of Edge Centrality in Social Networks , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[15]  S. Dowdy,et al.  Statistics for Research: Dowdy/Statistics , 2005 .

[16]  Gary W. Chang,et al.  Power System Analysis , 1994 .

[17]  Fabio Saccomanno,et al.  Electric Power Systems: Analysis and Control , 2003 .

[18]  R. Merris Laplacian graph eigenvectors , 1998 .

[19]  Marija D. Ilic,et al.  Control and optimization methods for electric smart grids , 2012 .

[20]  Marwan Bikdash,et al.  Robustness and survivability of smart power grid and scada networks when subjected to severe emergencies, vulnerability and wmd attacks , 2013 .

[21]  M. Bikdash,et al.  Geographically-sensitive network centrality and survivability assessment , 2011, 2011 IEEE 43rd Southeastern Symposium on System Theory.

[22]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[23]  P. Lancaster,et al.  The theory of matrices : with applications , 1985 .

[24]  Ian Dobson,et al.  Exploring Complex Systems Aspects of Blackout Risk and Mitigation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[25]  J. Leydold,et al.  Laplacian eigenvectors of graphs : Perron-Frobenius and Faber-Krahn type theorems , 2007 .

[26]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[27]  Yongpei Guan,et al.  Two-stage robust optimization for N-k contingency-constrained unit commitment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[28]  Juan C. Meza,et al.  Optimization Strategies for the Vulnerability Analysis of the Electric Power Grid , 2010, SIAM J. Optim..

[29]  Narsingh Deo,et al.  Graph Theory with Applications to Engineering and Computer Science , 1975, Networks.

[30]  Zhuo Lu,et al.  Cyber security in the Smart Grid: Survey and challenges , 2013, Comput. Networks.

[31]  I. Kamwa,et al.  Causes of the 2003 major grid blackouts in North America and Europe, and recommended means to improve system dynamic performance , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[32]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrality , 2002, Soc. Networks.