Neural and behavioral effects of subordinate‐level training of novel objects across manipulations of color and spatial frequency

Perceptual expertise is marked by subordinate‐level recognition of objects in the expert domain. In this study, participants learned one family of full‐color, artificial objects at the subordinate (species) level and another family at the basic (family) level. Discrimination of trained and untrained exemplars was tested before and after training across several image manipulations [full‐color, grayscale, low spatial frequency (LSF) and high spatial frequency (HSF)] while event‐related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. Regardless of image manipulation, discrimination (indexed by d’) of trained and of untrained exemplars was enhanced after subordinate‐level training, but not after basic‐level training. Enhanced discrimination after subordinate‐level training generalized to untrained exemplars and to grayscale images and images in which LSF or HSF information was removed. After training, the N170 and N250, recorded over occipital and occipitotemporal brain regions, were both more enhanced after subordinate‐level training than after basic‐level training. However, the topographic distribution of enhanced responses differed across components. The N170 latency predicted reaction time after both basic‐level training and subordinate‐level training, highlighting an association between behavioral and neural responses. These findings further elucidate the role of the N170 and N250 as ERP indices of subordinate‐level expert object processing and demonstrate how low‐level manipulations of color and spatial frequency impact behavior and the N170 and N250 components independent of training or expertise.

[1]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The Training and Transfer of Real-World Perceptual Expertise , 2005, Psychological science.

[5]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The role of category learning in the acquisition and retention of perceptual expertise: A behavioral and neurophysiological study , 2008, Brain Research.

[6]  C. Jacques,et al.  The N170 : understanding the time-course of face perception in the human brain , 2011 .

[7]  J. Tanaka,et al.  A Neural Basis for Expert Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.

[8]  Lara J Pierce,et al.  The neural plasticity of other-race face recognition , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  J. Tanaka The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  D. Tucker,et al.  Spatial sampling and filtering of EEG with spline Laplacians to estimate cortical potentials , 2005, Brain Topography.

[11]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Conditions for Facelike Expertise with Objects Becoming a Ziggerin Expert—but Which Type? , 2022 .

[12]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[13]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[14]  P. Schyns,et al.  Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[16]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Degrees of Expertise , 2009 .

[17]  D. Tucker Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[19]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[21]  Q. Vuong,et al.  The role of spatial frequency in expert object recognition. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  M. Tarr,et al.  Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological Responses , 2002, Psychological science.

[23]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[24]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Macke,et al.  Quantifying the effect of intertrial dependence on perceptual decisions. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[26]  Lara J. Pierce,et al.  The N250 Brain Potential to Personally Familiar and Newly Learned Faces and Objects , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  A Reevaluation of the Electrophysiological Correlates of Expert Object Processing , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  A. Burton,et al.  N250r: a face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions , 2004, Neuroreport.

[29]  L. Scott Face Perception and Perceptual Expertise in Adult and Developmental Populations , 2011 .

[30]  T. Busey,et al.  Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts , 2005, Vision Research.

[31]  I. Gauthier,et al.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[32]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  The effect of category learning on visual attention and visual representation. , 2017, Psychophysiology.

[33]  Gert Cauwenberghs,et al.  Neuromorphic Silicon Neuron Circuits , 2011, Front. Neurosci.

[34]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences between face and object processing. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[37]  Tim Curran,et al.  The role of color in expert object recognition. , 2014, Journal of vision.