Analytical approaches to investigating seabird-environment interactions: a review

A goal of seabird ecology is to relate the physiology, population dynamics, distribution and behaviour of seabirds with their biotic and abiotic environments. One of the most challenging aspects is to understand how seabirds interact with their environment when direct observations are not always possible or practical. In the present paper, we reviewed 218 published studies that exam- ined associations between seabird distribution, behaviour and their environment, in order to assess current trends, weaknesses and the future directions of research. Based on the number of publica- tions, it is evident that the field is growing rapidly and that methods for evaluating seabird distribu- tion are becoming increasingly more sophisticated and are changing from Eulerian (grid-like) to Lagrangian (particle-like) data types. This has been accompanied by a reduction in the spatial and temporal scale of observation, where, in most cases, no behavioural information is inferred from Lagrangian data; instead they are often used as if they were Eulerian data. In parallel, environmen- tal remote sensing is becoming more common; however, we did not record significant changes in the statistical approaches used to describe seabird distributions and used to link them with oceano- graphic variables. In particular, despite the spatially explicit nature of the data, spatial statistics have rarely been used. The vast majority of studies used environmental variables that described water masses (descriptive approach), whereas a few studies determined oceanographic features that enhance prey availability to seabirds (process-based approach). Future studies could enhance their ecological interpretation of seabird-environment interactions by making greater use of ad hoc statis- tical approaches that facilitate appropriate pattern detection (e.g. area-restricted searching pattern for birds, mesoscale patterns for environment). Furthermore, appropriate hypothesis testing and modelling that accounts for the spatially explicit, multiscale and multivariate nature of the interaction between seabirds and their habitats is recommended. Although quantitative methods currently exist (but are rarely used), further application could greatly improve our understanding of the processes linking seabird distribution to their environment.

[1]  W. Walkusz,et al.  Foraging behavior of little auks in a heterogeneous environment , 2003 .

[2]  J. Koslow,et al.  Comparison of mesozooplankton communities from a pair of warm- and cold-core eddies off the coast of Western Australia , 2007 .

[3]  W. Wolff,et al.  Responses of seabirds, in particular prions (Pachyptila sp.), to small-scale processes in the Antarctic Polar Front , 2002 .

[4]  J. Navarro,et al.  Experimental increase of flying costs in a pelagic seabird: effects on foraging strategies, nutritional state and chick condition , 2007, Oecologia.

[5]  A. Bakun,et al.  Fronts and eddies as key structures in the habitat of marine fish larvae: opportunity, adaptive response and competitive advantage , 2006 .

[6]  G. Hunt,et al.  Scale‐dependent correlations between the abundance of Brünnich's guillemots and their prey , 1999 .

[7]  Emily D. Silverman,et al.  Aggregation patterns of pelagic predators and their principal prey, Antarctic krill, near South Georgia , 1993 .

[8]  G. Gudmundsson,et al.  FORAGING FLIGHTS OF BREEDING THICK-BILLED MURRES (URIA LOMVIA) AS REVEALED BY BIRD-BORNE DIRECTION RECORDERS , 1998 .

[9]  P. Legendre Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[10]  Horst Bornemann,et al.  All at sea with animal tracks; methodological and analytical solutions for the resolution of movement , 2007 .

[11]  R. Abrams Pelagic seabirds and trawl-fisheries in the southern Benguela Current region , 1983 .

[12]  P. Otáhal,et al.  Environmental conditions and life history constraints determine foraging range in breeding Adélie penguins , 2006 .

[13]  Michael S. Rosenberg,et al.  Conceptual and Mathematical Relationships among Methods for Spatial Analysis , 2022 .

[14]  P. D. Abel,et al.  Ecotoxicology and the marine environment , 1991 .

[15]  P. A. Prince,et al.  Cephalopods and mesoscale oceanography at the Antarctic Polar Front: satellite tracked predators locate pelagic trophic interactions , 1996 .

[16]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Prying into the intimate details of animal lives: use of a daily diary on animals , 2008 .

[17]  Jennifer L. Dungan,et al.  Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data , 2002 .

[18]  J. Haney Ocean Internal Waves as Sources of Small-Scale Patchiness in Seabird Distribution on the Blake Plateau , 1987 .

[19]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Moving towards acceleration for estimates of activity-specific metabolic rate in free-living animals: the case of the cormorant. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[20]  P. Dutton,et al.  The Kuroshio Extension Bifurcation Region: A pelagic hotspot for juvenile loggerhead sea turtles , 2006 .

[21]  Thomas R. Loughlin,et al.  Oceanographic features related to northern fur seal migratory movements , 2005 .

[22]  H. Skov,et al.  Seabird distribution in relation to hydrography in the Skagerrak , 2000 .

[23]  G. Pierce,et al.  Remotely sensed mesoscale oceanography and the distribution of Illex argentinus in the South Atlantic , 2001 .

[24]  C. Harrison Spring Distribution of Marine Birds in the Gulf of Alaska , 1982 .

[25]  D. Ainley,et al.  Feeding Ecology of Marine Cormorants in Southwestern North America , 1981 .

[26]  D. Ainley,et al.  Distribution, abundance and behaviour of Buller’s, Chatham Island and Salvin's Albatrosses off Chile and Peru , 2003 .

[27]  X. Irigoien,et al.  Zooplankton dynamics in a mesoscale eddy-jet system off California , 2000 .

[28]  Vasilis D. Valavanis,et al.  Marine GIS: Identification of mesoscale oceanic thermal fronts , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[29]  Adrian P. Martin Phytoplankton patchiness: the role of lateral stirring and mixing , 2003 .

[30]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[31]  Richard L. O 'Driscoll Description of spatial pattern in seabird distributions along line transects using neighbour K statistics , 1998 .

[32]  L. Ballance,et al.  Oceanographic influences on seabirds and cetaceans of the eastern tropical Pacific: A review , 2006 .

[33]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Seabird associations with mesoscale eddies: the subtropical Indian Ocean , 2006 .

[34]  Bernie J. McConnell,et al.  Estimating space‐use and habitat preference from wildlife telemetry data , 2008 .

[35]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  Top marine predators track Lagrangian coherent structures , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  W. Sydeman,et al.  Primary producer and seabird associations with AVHRR-derived sea surface temperatures and gradients in the southeastern Gulf of Alaska , 2006 .

[37]  S. Wotherspoon,et al.  Distribution and abundance of Wilson’s storm petrels Oceanites oceanicus at two locations in East Antarctica: testing habitat selection models , 2006, Polar Biology.

[38]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  DETERMINATION OF MOVEMENTS OF AFRICAN PENGUINS SPHENISCUS DEMERSUS USING A COMPASS SYSTEM: DEAD RECKONING MAY BE AN ALTERNATIVE TO TELEMETRY , 1991 .

[39]  S. Garthe,et al.  Seabird distribution on the Humboldt Current in northern Chile in relation to hydrography, productivity, and fisheries , 2004 .

[40]  J. Haney Foraging by Northern Fulmars (Fulmaris glacialis) at a Nearshore, Anticyclonic Tidal Eddy in the Northern Bering Sea, Alaska , 1988 .

[41]  P. Mayzaud,et al.  Mesoscale distribution of zooplankton in the Sub-Antarctic Frontal system in the Indian part of the Southern Ocean: a comparison between optical plankton counter and net sampling , 2002 .

[42]  J. Haney Seabird affinities for Gulf Stream frontal eddies: Responses of mobile marine consumers to episodic upwelling , 1986 .

[43]  Vsevolod Afanasyev,et al.  Year-round distribution of white-chinned petrels from South Georgia: Relationships with oceanography and fisheries , 2006 .

[44]  D. Heinemann,et al.  DISTRIBUTIONS AND PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS OF MACARONI PENGUINS, ANTARCTIC FUR SEALS, AND ANTARCTIC KRILL NEAR BIRD-ISLAND, SOUTH GEORGIA , 1992 .

[45]  Christine A. Ribic,et al.  The relationships of seabird assemblages to physical habitat features in Pacific equatorial waters during spring 1984-1991 , 1997 .

[46]  C. Joiris Spring distribution and ecological role of seabirds and marine mammals in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica , 1991, Polar Biology.

[47]  M. A. Fedak,et al.  Variations in behavior and condition of a Southern Ocean top predator in relation to in situ oceanographic conditions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  J. Haney Seabird patchiness in tropical oceanic waters: the influence of Sargassum reefs , 1986 .

[49]  P. A. Prince,et al.  Foraging location and range of white-chinned petrels Procellaria aequinoctialis breeding in the South Atlantic , 2000 .

[50]  R. Bonduriansky,et al.  Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates , 1999 .

[51]  J. M. Arcos,et al.  Geographical patterns of seabird attendance to a research trawler along the Iberian Mediterranean coast , 2003 .

[52]  S. Garthe,et al.  How does a generalist seabird species use its marine habitat? The case of the kelp gull in a coastal upwelling area of the Humboldt Current , 2007 .

[53]  L. Einoder,et al.  A review of the use of seabirds as indicators in fisheries and ecosystem management , 2009 .

[54]  Scott A. Shaffer,et al.  Perspectives in Ornithology: Application of tracking and data-logging technology in research and conservation of seabirds , 2009 .

[55]  Katsuya Saitoh,et al.  Albacore (Thunnus alalunga) fishing ground in relation to oceanographic conditions in the western North Pacific Ocean using remotely sensed satellite data , 2008 .

[56]  James G. Mitchell,et al.  Phytoplankton patch patterns: Seascape anatomy in a turbulent ocean , 2008 .

[57]  C. Bost,et al.  Utilisation of the oceanic habitat by king penguins over the annual cycle , 2001 .

[58]  D. Kobayashi,et al.  The transition zone chlorophyll front, a dynamic global feature defining migration and forage habitat for marine resources , 2001 .

[59]  P. I. Miller Multi-spectral front maps for automatic detection of ocean colour features from SeaWiFS , 2004 .

[60]  Michael P. Meredith,et al.  Antarctic Circumpolar Current frontal system in the South Atlantic: Monitoring using merged Argo and animal-borne sensor data , 2008 .

[61]  J. Haney Seabird segregation at Gulf Stream frontal eddies , 1986 .

[62]  R. Abrams Environmental determinants of pelagic seabird distribution in the African sector of the Southern ocean , 1985 .

[63]  G. Hays,et al.  Influence of ocean currents on long-distance movement of leatherback sea turtles in the Southwest Indian Ocean , 2008 .

[64]  M. Hindell,et al.  Foraging zones of royal penguins during the breeding season, and their association with oceanographic features , 1997 .

[65]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data : a review , 2007 .

[66]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Community structure across a large-scale ocean productivity gradient: Marine bird assemblages of the Southern Indian Ocean , 2007 .

[67]  P. Dixon,et al.  Accounting for Spatial Pattern When Modeling Organism- Environment Interactions , 2022 .

[68]  S. Garthe Influence of hydrography, fishing activity, and colony location on summer seabird distribution in the south-eastern North Sea , 1997 .

[69]  Michel Potier,et al.  Foraging strategy of a top predator in tropical waters: great frigatebirds in the Mozambique Channel , 2004 .

[70]  Sb Brandt Effects of a Warm-Core Eddy on Fish Distributions in the Tasman Sea of East Australia , 1981 .

[71]  S. Levin THE PROBLEM OF PATTERN AND SCALE IN ECOLOGY , 1992 .

[72]  L. Lewis,et al.  Behavioural interactions of seabirds with suspended mussel longlines , 2007, Aquaculture International.

[73]  H. Higuchi,et al.  Foraging activity and submesoscale habitat use of waved albatrosses Phoebastria irrorata during chick-brooding period , 2005 .

[74]  G. Swartzman,et al.  Spatial association between murres (Uria spp.), puffins (Fratercula spp.) and fish shoals near Pribilof Islands, Alaska , 2000 .

[75]  George L. Hunt,et al.  Foraging in a fractal environment: Spatial patterns in a marine predator-prey system , 1992, Landscape Ecology.

[76]  S. Jacobs,et al.  Seabird distribution and oceanic features of the Amundsen and southern Bellingshausen seas , 1998, Antarctic Science.

[77]  T. D. Dickey,et al.  Influence of mesoscale eddies on new production in the Sargasso Sea , 1998, Nature.

[78]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Remote-sensing systems and seabirds: their use, abuse and potential for measuring marine environmental variables , 2002 .

[79]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  Scale‐dependent habitat use in a long‐ranging central place predator , 2005 .

[80]  Mirtha Lewis,et al.  Southern elephant seal trajectories, fronts and eddies in the Brazil/Malvinas Confluence , 2006 .

[81]  William J. Sydeman,et al.  Upper trophic level predators indicate interannual negative and positive anomalies in the California Current food web , 1995 .

[82]  M. Tasker,et al.  Counting seabirds at Sea from ships: comments on interstudy comparisons and methodological standardization. Reply , 1985 .

[83]  P. Ryan,et al.  Exploitation of mesoscale oceanographic features by grey-headed albatross Thalassarche chrysostoma in the southern Indian Ocean , 2001 .

[84]  Alexis Chaigneau,et al.  Mesoscale eddies off Peru in altimeter records: Identification algorithms and eddy spatio-temporal patterns , 2008 .

[85]  L. Ballance,et al.  SEABIRD COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ALONG A PRODUCTIVITY GRADIENT: IMPORTANCE OF COMPETITION AND ENERGETIC CONSTRAINT , 1997 .

[86]  R. Furness,et al.  Influences of coastal habitat characteristics on the distribution of Cory's Shearwaters Calonectris diomedea in the Azores archipelago , 2000 .

[87]  Patrick J Butler,et al.  Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[88]  R. Hewitt,et al.  Scale-dependent spatial variance patterns and correlations of seabirds and prey in the southeastern Bering Sea as revealed by spectral analysis , 1998 .

[89]  R. Phillips,et al.  Foraging strategies of grey-headed albatrosses Thalassarche chrysostoma: integration of movements, activity and feeding events , 2004 .

[90]  G. Hunt Occurrence of polar seabirds at sea in relation to prey concentrations and oceanographic factors , 1991 .