Teledermatology research review

Teledermatology consultations can be performed using either store‐and‐forward or real‐time technology. The best‐studied aspect of teledermatology is diagnostic reliability, also known as diagnostic agreement. A good level of diagnostic reliability is achieved by dermatologists using both store‐and‐forward and real‐time modalities and is comparable to that found between clinic‐based examiners. Less information is available regarding diagnostic accuracy. Current data suggest that teledermatologists reviewing store‐and‐forward consults achieve accuracy comparable to that of clinic‐based dermatologists. When store‐and‐forward consult systems are used, approximately one in four in‐person clinic appointments are averted. Real‐time consult systems avoid the need to schedule approximately one in two clinic visits. Store‐and‐forward technology results in timelier interventions for patients when compared to a conventional referral process. To date, surveys of both store‐and‐forward and real‐time teledermatology consult modalities suggest that patients, referring clinicians, and dermatologists are all highly satisfied with teledermatology consults. Very little has been published about the economic impact of store‐and‐forward teledermatology, whereas several studies have evaluated real‐time modalities. Teledermatology has ranged from a cost‐saving strategy to an intervention that incurs greater costs than conventional care, depending on the health care setting and economic perspective. Future research focusing on diagnostic accuracy, clinical outcomes using clinical course or disease status as outcome measures, development of reliable and valid teledermatology‐specific survey instruments, and economic analyses that assess cost‐effectiveness will help guide future teledermatology program assessments and policy.

[1]  Elizabeth Krupinski,et al.  Telemedicine versus in-person dermatology referrals: an analysis of case complexity. , 2002, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[2]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  J. Dover,et al.  The substitution of digital images for dermatologic physical examination. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[4]  Steven C Grambow,et al.  Teledermatology's impact on time to intervention among referrals to a dermatology consult service. , 2002, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[5]  H. Lamminen,et al.  A feasibility study of realtime teledermatology in Finland , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[6]  M Rademaker,et al.  A cost-minimization analysis of the societal costs of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: results from a randomized controlled trial in New Zealand , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[7]  P V Harrison,et al.  Teledermatology—high technology or not? , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[8]  P V Harrison,et al.  A portable digital imaging system in dermatology: Diagnostic and educational applications , 1997, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[9]  T. Bergmo,et al.  A cost-minimization analysis of a realtime teledermatology service in northern Norway , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[10]  J W Burnett,et al.  Teledermatology and in-person examinations: a comparison of patient and physician perceptions and diagnostic agreement. , 1998, Archives of dermatology.

[11]  P Jacklin,et al.  A randomized controlled trial assessing the health economics of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: an urban versus rural perspective , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[12]  B. Zelickson,et al.  Teledermatology in the nursing home. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[13]  M. Chren,et al.  Measurement properties of skindex-16: A brief quality-of-life measure for patients with skin diseases , 2001, Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery.

[14]  T. Wong,et al.  Depigmented genital extramammary Paget’s disease: A possible histogenetic link to Toker’s clear cells and clear cell papulosis , 2001, Journal of cutaneous pathology.

[15]  J. Post,et al.  Teledermatology as a tool for communication between general practitioners and dermatologists , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[16]  Griffiths,et al.  Comparison of teleconsultations and face‐to‐face consultations: preliminary results of a United Kingdom multicentre teledermatology study , 1998, The British journal of dermatology.

[17]  R. Poropatich,et al.  Teledermatology: an intraobserver diagnostic correlation study, part I. , 2003, Cutis.

[18]  J. Whited,et al.  An economic analysis of a store and forward teledermatology consult system. , 2003, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[19]  Lansing G. Ellsworth,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology. , 1999, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[20]  A. Lim,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of store‐and‐forward teledermatology: Preliminary results from the St George Teledermatology Project , 2001, The Australasian journal of dermatology.

[21]  J. Kvedar,et al.  Teledermatology in a capitated delivery system using distributed information architecture: design and development. , 1999, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[22]  H Lamminen,et al.  A cost study of teleconsultation for primary-care ophthalmology and dermatology , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[23]  B Kvammen,et al.  A comparative study of teleconsultations versus face-to-face consultations , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[24]  M. Du Moulin,et al.  The reliability of diagnosis using store-and-forward teledermatology , 2003, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[25]  D. Eedy,et al.  Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost-benefit analysis , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  M. Weinstock,et al.  Patient and referring provider satisfaction with teledermatology. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[27]  L. Drage,et al.  Assessment of the accuracy of low-cost store-and-forward teledermatology consultation. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[28]  P. Taylor,et al.  Evaluating a telemedicine system to assist in the management of dermatology referrals , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[29]  N. Shaw,et al.  Patient satisfaction with teledermatology is related to perceived quality of life , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[30]  J. Whited,et al.  Reliability and accuracy of dermatologists' clinic-based and digital image consultations. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[31]  S Gustke,et al.  Reliability of dermatology teleconsultations with the use of teleconferencing technology. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[32]  H. Chan,et al.  Teledermatology in Hong Kong: a cost‐effective method to provide service to the elderly patients living in institutions , 2000, International journal of dermatology.

[33]  J. Lesher,et al.  Telemedicine evaluation of cutaneous diseases: a blinded comparative study. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[34]  C. Griffiths,et al.  Development of the PSORIQoL, a psoriasis‐specific measure of quality of life designed for use in clinical practice and trials , 2003, The British journal of dermatology.

[35]  C M Phillips,et al.  Reliability of telemedicine in evaluating skin tumors. , 1998, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[36]  Harold White,et al.  The Cornwall dermatology electronic referral and image-transfer project , 1999, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[37]  R. Poropatich,et al.  Web-based teledermatology consult system: preliminary results from the first 100 cases. , 1999, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[38]  D. Eedy,et al.  Patient satisfaction with realtime teledermatology in Northern Ireland , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[39]  J. Whited,et al.  A pilot trial of digital imaging in skin cancer , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[40]  D. Eedy,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and clinical management by realtime teledermatology. Results from the Northern Ireland arms of the UK Multicentre Teledermatology Trial , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[41]  William F. Mason,et al.  Telemedicine in Nova Scotia: report of a pilot study. , 1998, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[42]  D. Eedy,et al.  A comparison of real‐time and store‐and‐forward teledermatology: a cost–benefit study , 2000, The British journal of dermatology.

[43]  J. Mckinlay,et al.  Teledermatology in the Highlands of Scotland , 1996, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.