Exposure assessment of nano-sized and respirable particles at different workplaces

In this study, nanoparticle (NP, diameter < 100 nm) and respirable particles measurements were conducted at three different nanopowder workplaces, including the mixing area of a nano-SiO2-epoxy molding compound plant (primary diameter: 15 nm), bagging areas of a nano-carbon black (nano-CB) (primary diameter: 32 nm) and a nano-CaCO3 (primary diameter: 94 nm) manufacturing plant. Chemical analysis of respirable particle mass (RPM) and NPs was performed to quantify the content of manufactured nanoparticles in the collected samples. Nanopowder products obtained from the plants were used in the laboratory dustiness testing using a rotating drum tester to obtain particle mass and number distributions. The obtained laboratory data were then used to elucidate the field data. Both field and laboratory data showed that NP number and mass concentrations of manufactured materials were close to the background level. Number concentration was elevated only for particles with the electrical mobility diameter >100 nm during bagging or feeding processes, unless there were combustion-related incidental sources existed. Large fraction of nanomaterials was found in the RPM due to agglomeration of nanomaterials or attachment of nanomaterials to the larger particles. From this study, it is concluded that RPM concentration measurements are necessary for the exposure assessment of nanoparticles in workplaces.

[1]  Derk Brouwer,et al.  Exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in different workplaces. , 2010, Toxicology.

[2]  Paul Schulte,et al.  Occupational Risk Management of Engineered Nanoparticles , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[3]  Chu‐Fang Wang,et al.  Determination of silicon in airborne particulate matter by UV-visible spectrophotometry , 1997 .

[4]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  Derk H Brouwer,et al.  Size selective dustiness and exposure; simulated workplace comparisons. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[6]  David Y. H. Pui,et al.  Editorial: Recent advances and new challenges of occupational and environmental health of nanotechnology , 2009 .

[7]  Delphine Bard,et al.  From workplace air measurement results toward estimates of exposure? Development of a strategy to assess exposure to manufactured nano-objects , 2009 .

[8]  Laura Hodson,et al.  Approaches to safe nanotechnology; managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineered nanomaterials , 2009 .

[9]  P. Baron,et al.  Exposure to Carbon Nanotube Material: Aerosol Release During the Handling of Unrefined Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Material , 2004, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[10]  D M O'Brien,et al.  The application of dustiness tests to the prediction of worker dust exposure. , 1990, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[11]  Derk H Brouwer,et al.  Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in the workplace: exploring sampling techniques and strategies. , 2004, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[12]  M Methner,et al.  Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique (NEAT) for the Identification and Measurement of Potential Inhalation Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials—Part A , 2010, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[13]  Thomas Schneider,et al.  Combined single-drop and rotating drum dustiness test of fine to nanosize powders using a small drum. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[14]  Chuen-Jinn Tsai,et al.  Measurements of respirable dust and nanoparticle concentrations in a titanium dioxide pigment production factory , 2010, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[15]  Peng-Chi Tsai,et al.  Dustiness test of nanopowders using a standard rotating drum with a modified sampling train , 2009 .

[16]  Junji Cao,et al.  Characterization of carbon fractions for atmospheric fine particles and nanoparticles in a highway tunnel , 2010 .

[17]  T A J Kuhlbusch,et al.  Number Size Distribution, Mass Concentration, and Particle Composition of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 in Bag Filling Areas of Carbon Black Production , 2004, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[18]  Sherrie Elzey,et al.  Airborne Monitoring to Distinguish Engineered Nanomaterials from Incidental Particles for Environmental Health and Safety , 2008, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[19]  Per Axel Clausen,et al.  Dustiness behaviour of loose and compacted Bentonite and organoclay powders: What is the difference in exposure risk? , 2009 .

[20]  Chuen-Jinn Tsai,et al.  Field Study of the Accuracy of Two Respirable Sampling Cyclones , 1999 .

[21]  Chuen-Jinn Tsai,et al.  Chemical Mass Closure and Chemical Characteristics of Ambient Ultrafine Particles and other PM Fractions , 2010 .

[22]  Tung-Sheng Shih,et al.  Effect of deposited particles and particle charge on the penetration of small sampling cyclones , 1999 .

[23]  Keld Alstrup Jensen,et al.  Relevance of aerosol dynamics and dustiness for personal exposure to manufactured nanoparticles , 2009 .