Pose Estimation of Quadratic Surfaces Using Range Image Data

Pose estimation of known quadratic surfaces from possibly noisy data is important in robotics, and there is room for generating improved algorithms which achieve global optinia, and if possible on line. Current algorithms frequently converge to local minima of the performance index and are unsuited for on line applications because of the intensive computer effort required. Algebraic solutions are first proposed based on a two stage optimization involving least squares estimation, or better the method of instrumental variables, and 3 x 3 matrix diagonalizations. The resulting estimates are optimal in a reasonable sense and can be implemented on line. In the noise free, finite data case, or in the infinite data, white noise case the results give zero error, and small error for the case of finite data and small noise. The first stage of the procedure ignores a priori knowledge of the surface shape and estimates the quadratic coefficient matrix via least squares or the method of instrumental variables. The second stage exploits the priori shape information to estimate the pose of the object using diagonalization of 3 x 3 matrices.

[1]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Model-based classification of quadric surfaces , 1993 .

[2]  Eam Khwang Teoh,et al.  A Hybrid Approach towards Segmentation of Range Images , 1992, MVA.

[3]  K. Kumamaru,et al.  Determining salient feature points of 3-D curved surfaces from range images , 1991, Proceedings IECON '91: 1991 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation.

[4]  Alexander A. Sawchuk,et al.  A region matching motion estimation algorithm , 1991, CVGIP Image Underst..

[5]  Wesley E. Snyder,et al.  Pose determination using tree annealing , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  R. Brockett Least squares matching problems , 1989 .

[7]  Bir Bhanu,et al.  Recognition of 3-D objects in range images using a butterfly multiprocessor , 1989, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Ramesh C. Jain,et al.  Segmentation through Variable-Order Surface Fitting , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  James U. Korein,et al.  Robotics , 2018, IBM Syst. J..

[10]  Wesley E. Snyder,et al.  Linear estimation of object pose from local fits to segments , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Richard A. Volz,et al.  Range image segmentation and surface parameter extraction for 3-D object recognition of industrial parts , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  M. Hebert,et al.  The Representation, Recognition, and Locating of 3-D Objects , 1986 .

[13]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  3DPO: A Three- Dimensional Part Orientation System , 1986, IJCAI.

[14]  T. Söderström,et al.  Optimal instrumental variable estimation and approximate implementations , 1983 .

[15]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Comparison of some instrumental variable methods - Consistency and accuracy aspects , 1981, Autom..

[16]  Kwan Wong,et al.  Identification of linear discrete time systems using the instrumental variable method , 1967, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.