Assessing estuarine benthic quality conditions in Chesapeake Bay: A comparison of three indices

Abstract Legislation in US and Europe has been adopted to determine the ecological integrity of estuarine and coastal waters, including, as one of the most relevant elements, the benthic macroinvertebrate communities. It has been recommended that greater emphasis should be placed on evaluating the suitability of existing indices prior to developing new ones. This study compares two widely used measures of ecological integrity, the Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity (B-IBI) developed in USA and the European AZTI's Marine Biotic Index (AMBI) and its multivariate extension, the M-AMBI. Specific objectives were to identify the frequency, magnitude, and nature of differences in assessment of Chesapeake Bay sites as ‘degraded’ or ‘undegraded’ by the indices. A dataset of 275 subtidal samples taken in 2003 from Chesapeake Bay were used in this comparison. Linear regression of B-IBI and AMBI, accounted for 24% of the variability; however, when evaluated by salinity regimes, the explained variability increased in polyhaline (38%), high mesohaline (38%), and low mesohaline (35%) habitats, remained similar in the tidal freshwater (25%), and decreased in oligohaline areas (17%). Using the M-AMBI, the explained variability increased to 43% for linear regression, and 54% for logarithmic regression. By salinity regime, the highest explained variability was found in high mesohaline and low polyhaline areas (53–63%), while the lowest explained variability was in the oligohaline and tidal freshwater areas (6–17%). The total disagreement between methods, in terms of degraded-undegraded classifications, was 28%, with high spatial levels of agreement. Our study suggests that different methodologies in assessing benthic quality can provide similar results even though these methods have been developed within different geographical areas.

[1]  Jean-Claude Dauvin,et al.  Paradox of estuarine quality: benthic indicators and indices, consensus or debate for the future. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[2]  J. Summers,et al.  Species-abundance-biomass responses by estuarine macrobenthos to sediment chemical contamination , 2000 .

[3]  J S Gray,et al.  Pollution-induced changes in populations. , 1979, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  Jean-Claude Dauvin,et al.  Use of biotic indices in semi-enclosed coastal ecosystems and transitional waters habitats - Implications for the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive , 2008 .

[5]  J. Dauvin,et al.  The ecological quality status of the Bay of Seine and the Seine estuary: use of biotic indices. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[6]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[7]  R. Leemans,et al.  Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic , 1992 .

[8]  Ángel Borja,et al.  A Marine Biotic Index to Establish the Ecological Quality of Soft-Bottom Benthos Within European Estuarine and Coastal Environments , 2000 .

[9]  S. Weisberg,et al.  An estuarine benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for Chesapeake Bay , 1997 .

[10]  J. Dauvin,et al.  “Using historical data, expert judgement and multivariate analysis in assessing reference conditions and benthic ecological status, according to the European Water Framework Directive”, , 2007 .

[11]  C.,et al.  Use of biotic indices in semi-enclosed coastal ecosystems and transitional waters habitats — Implications for the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive , 2007 .

[12]  I. Muxika,et al.  Long-term recovery of soft-bottom benthos following urban and industrial sewage treatment in the Nervión estuary (southern Bay of Biscay) , 2006 .

[13]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability , 1973 .

[14]  Angel Borja,et al.  An approach to the intercalibration of benthic ecological status assessment in the North Atlantic ecoregion, according to the European Water Framework Directive. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[15]  Angel Borja,et al.  Testing the applicability of a Marine Biotic Index (AMBI) to assessing the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthic communities, in the South America Atlantic region. , 2005, Marine pollution bulletin.

[16]  R. Rosenberg,et al.  Characterization of the ecological quality of the coastal Gulf of Lions (NW Mediterranean). A comparative approach based on three biotic indices. , 2006, Marine pollution bulletin.

[17]  J. Rosen,et al.  A benthic index of biological integrity for assessing habitat quality in estuaries of the southeastern USA , 1999 .

[18]  D. Dauer.  Biological criteria, environmental health and estuarine macrobenthic community structure , 1993 .

[19]  R. Alden,et al.  Statistical verification of the Chesapeake Bay benthic index of biotic integrity , 2002 .

[20]  Stephen B. Weisberg,et al.  Relationships between benthic community condition, water quality, sediment quality, nutrient loads, and land use patterns in Chesapeake Bay , 2000 .

[21]  Michael Elliott,et al.  The derivation, performance and role of univariate and multivariate indicators of benthic change : Case studies at differing spatial scales , 2006 .

[22]  I. Muxika,et al.  Assessing reference conditions and physico-chemical status according to the European Water Framework Directive: a case-study from the Basque Country (Northern Spain). , 2005, Marine pollution bulletin.

[23]  J. Summers,et al.  MACROBENTHIC RESPONSES TO NATURAL AND CONTAMINANT-RELATED GRADIENTS IN NORTHERN GULF OF MEXICO ESTUARIES , 1997 .

[24]  D. Dauer,et al.  Application of two indices of benthic community condition in Chesapeake Bay , 2002 .

[25]  R. Valente,et al.  A review of approaches for classifying benthic habitats and evaluating habitat quality. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  Structure et bioévaluation de l'état écologique des communautés benthiques d'un écosystème lagunaire de la côte atlantique marocaine , 2005 .

[27]  I. Muxika,et al.  The suitability of the marine biotic index (AMBI) to new impact sources along European coasts , 2005 .

[28]  Angel Borja,et al.  Guidelines for the use of AMBI (AZTI's Marine Biotic Index) in the assessment of the benthic ecological quality. , 2005, Marine pollution bulletin.

[29]  Ángel Borja,et al.  The European water framework directive: A challenge for nearshore, coastal and continental shelf research , 2005 .

[30]  A Comparison of Two Methods for Estimating the Status of Benthic Habitat Quality in the Virginia Chesapeake Bay , 2003 .

[31]  CHESAPEAKE BAY WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM LONG-TERM BENTHIC MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT COMPONENT LEVEL I COMPREHENSIVE REPORT , 2006 .

[32]  Juan Bald,et al.  Implementation of the European water framework directive from the Basque country (northern Spain): a methodological approach. , 2004, Marine pollution bulletin.

[33]  Á. Borja.  The new European Marine Strategy Directive: difficulties, opportunities, and challenges. , 2006, Marine pollution bulletin.

[34]  R. Llansó.  Methods for Calculating The Chesapeake Bay Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity , 2002 .

[35]  D. Dauer,et al.  An estuarine benthic index of biotic integrity for the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States. I. Classification of assemblages and habitat definition , 2002 .

[36]  I. Muxika,et al.  The application of a Marine Biotic Index to different impact sources affecting soft-bottom benthic communities along European coasts. , 2003, Marine pollution bulletin.

[37]  D. Dauer,et al.  An estuarine benthic index of biotic integrity for the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States. II. Index development , 2002 .

[38]  R. Rosenberg,et al.  Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment , 1978 .

[39]  James R. Karr,et al.  Assessing biological integrity in running waters : a method and its rationale , 1986 .

[40]  H. Reiss,et al.  Seasonal variability of benthic indices: an approach to test the applicability of different indices for ecosystem quality assessment. , 2005, Marine pollution bulletin.