The Effect of Diversity on Feelings of Belongingness for New Engineering Students

This research category full paper seeks to understand if feelings of belonging differ according to student demographics for first-year engineering students. Engineering has maintained a stable profile (i.e., white, masculine, and male) for many years, despite national trends in higher education. Multiple researchers have demonstrated that increased diversity leads to improved communication skills, creativity, and problem-solving capabilities, all goals that directly align with engineering’s core values. The lack of diversity within engineering has resulted in a culture which produces engineers that are underprepared and lacking the skills required to work in an increasingly diverse and global engineering market. Engineering’s cultural attitude towards diversity has created environments where students, especially underrepresented minorities (URM), feel that they do not belong despite meeting the academic requirements. To better understand feelings of belongingness within engineering education, the research team set out to answer the question: How do feelings of belongingness differ across demographic characteristics for new (second week) engineering students, enrolled in a first-year first-semester engineering course? Our results demonstrate that neither disability status, race or sexual identity significantly affect how new engineers report their perception of belonging. Female students entered engineering feeling that they belong but at a level significantly lower than their male peers. This suggests that there is still much work to be done in the K-12 environment to cultivate female students’ interest and confidence in engineering, as well as room for improving the welcoming of all students into engineering education.

[1]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  Identity, Belonging, and Achievement , 2008 .

[2]  Elizabeth Godfrey,et al.  Who leaves and who stays? Retention and attrition in engineering education , 2010 .

[3]  Valerie Purdie-Vaughns,et al.  Demystifying Values-Affirmation Interventions , 2013, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[4]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[5]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  Mere belonging: the power of social connections. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Rachel Louis Kajfez,et al.  Competence, Autonomy, and Relatedness as Motivators of Graduate Teaching Assistants , 2017 .

[7]  Suzanne McLaren,et al.  Sense of Belonging to the General and Lesbian Communities as Predictors of Depression Among Lesbians , 2009, Journal of homosexuality.

[8]  Alan E. Bayer,et al.  Engineering Education for Women: A Chilly Climate? , 2006 .

[9]  Steve Olson,et al.  Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President. , 2012 .

[10]  Elizabeth Godfrey,et al.  Mapping the Cultural Landscape in Engineering Education , 2010 .

[11]  A. Dainty,et al.  How Women Engineers Do and Undo Gender: Consequences for Gender Equality , 2009 .

[12]  L. Mamykina,et al.  Collaborative creativity , 2002, CACM.

[13]  Geoff Potvin,et al.  More Comprehensive and Inclusive Approaches to Demographic Data Collection , 2016 .

[14]  W. Faulkner `Nuts and Bolts and People' , 2007 .

[15]  Allison Godwin,et al.  Forget Diversity, Our Project is Due , 2017 .

[16]  Geoffrey L. Herman,et al.  Using self determination theory principles to promote engineering students’ intrinsic motivation to learn , 2016 .

[17]  Adam Kirn,et al.  First Generation Students Identification with and Feelings of Belongingness in Engineering , 2016 .

[18]  George D. Bishop,et al.  Emotion and Appraisal Profiles of the Needs for Competence and Relatedness , 2009 .

[19]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Cindy E. Foor,et al.  “I Wish that I Belonged More in this Whole Engineering Group:” Achieving Individual Diversity , 2007 .

[21]  Allison Godwin,et al.  Board 124: Interpersonal Interactions that Foster Inclusion: Building Supports for Diversity in Engineering Teams , 2018 .

[22]  Erin A. Cech,et al.  Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: the experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students , 2011 .

[23]  Larry W. Lake,et al.  Grand Challenges for Earth Resources Engineering , 2012 .

[24]  Sarah Kenny,et al.  Not Lack of Ability but More Choice , 2013, Psychological science.

[25]  Gregory M. Walton,et al.  A Brief Social-Belonging Intervention Improves Academic and Health Outcomes of Minority Students , 2011, Science.

[26]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Marginalized Identities of Sense‐Makers: Reframing Engineering Student Retention , 2014 .

[27]  Cindy Gallois,et al.  Impact of social group processes and functional diversity on communication in networked organizations , 2004 .

[28]  Allison Godwin,et al.  Developing an Instrument to Understand the Social-Structural Integration of Diverse Students , 2017 .

[29]  F. Brodbeck,et al.  The Influence of Social Identity and Personality on Outcomes of Cultural Diversity in Teams , 2004 .

[30]  Julie E. Mills,et al.  Implementing an Inclusive Curriculum for Women in Engineering Education , 2003 .

[31]  Una Tellhed,et al.  Will I Fit in and Do Well? The Importance of Social Belongingness and Self-Efficacy for Explaining Gender Differences in Interest in STEM and HEED Majors , 2016, Sex roles.

[32]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[33]  Walter C. Lee,et al.  Development of the Engineering Student Integration Instrument: Rethinking Measures of Integration , 2018 .

[34]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Social Identity Complexity , 2002 .

[35]  Vincent Tinto,et al.  Research and Practice of Student Retention: What Next? , 2006 .