Truncation in message-oriented phonology: a case study using Korean vocative truncation

Abstract This paper analyzes the vocative truncation pattern in Korean from the viewpoint of Message-Oriented Phonology (MOP), which capitalizes on the idea that sound patterns are governed by a principle that makes message transfer effective. In the traditional naming pattern, Korean first names consist of a generation marker and a unique portion, and the order between these two elements alternates between generations. To derive vocative forms, the generation marker is truncated, and the suffixal [(j)a] is attached to the unique portion. We argue that MOP naturally predicts this type of truncation. As the generation marker is shared by all the members of the same generation, the generation marker is highly predictable and hence does not reduce uncertainty about the intended message. To achieve effective communication, predictable portions are deleted. Our analysis implies that MOP is relevant not only to phonetic implementation patterns, but also to morphophonological patterns. It also provides support for MOP based on data from a non-Indo-European language. Finally, we aim to integrate insights of MOP with a more formal proposal like Optimality Theory, by relating the predictability of a contrast to the ranking of the faithfulness constraint that it protects, following the spirit of the P-map hypothesis.

[1]  Shosuke Haraguchi,et al.  The phonology-phonetics interface and Syllabic Theory , 2003 .

[2]  Jaye Padgett,et al.  Systemic contrast and Catalan rhotics , 2009 .

[3]  Juliette Blevins,et al.  The Role of Phonological Predictability in Sound Change: Privileged Reduction in Oceanic Reduplicated Substrings , 2005 .

[4]  Jongho Jun.  Hiatus resolution and opacity in Seoul Korean verbal paradigm , 2014 .

[5]  R. Mester,et al.  The Phonology of Voicing in Japanese: Theoretical Consequences for Morphological Accessibility , 2008 .

[6]  Paul Foulkes,et al.  Three steps forward for predictability. Consideration of methodological robustness, indexical and prosodic factors, and replication in the laboratory , 2018, Linguistics Vanguard.

[7]  Anthoula Revithiadou,et al.  Headmost accent wins : head dominance and ideal prosodic form in lexical accent systems , 1999 .

[8]  Janet M. Fuller,et al.  Latino Education , 2015, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[9]  Elizabeth Hume.  Phonological Markedness and its Relation to the Uncertainty of Words , 2016 .

[10]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[11]  Chigusa Kurumada,et al.  Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case-marking in Japanese , 2015 .

[12]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Kathleen Currie Hall,et al.  A Probabilistic Model of Phonological Relationships from Contrast to Allophony. , 2009 .

[14]  B. D. Boer.  Evolutionary phonology: the emergence of sound patterns , 2006 .

[15]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Articulatory gestures as phonological units , 1989, Phonology.

[16]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  Info/information theory: Speakers choose shorter words in predictive contexts , 2013, Cognition.

[17]  Shigeto Kawahara,et al.  A Faithfulness Ranking Projected from a Perceptibility Scale: The Case of [+ Voice] in Japanese , 2006 .

[18]  Edward Flemming.  Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology , 2001, Phonology.

[19]  E. Hume,et al.  The role of entropy and surprisal in phonologization and language change , 2013 .

[20]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Paradigm Uniformity and the Phonetics-Phonology Boundary , 1996 .

[21]  Jason A. Shaw,et al.  Surviving truncation: informativity at the interface of morphology and phonology , 2014 .

[22]  Uriel Cohen Priva.  Informativity affects consonant duration and deletion rates , 2015 .

[23]  J. Barnes.  Positional Neutralization: A Phonologization Approach to Typological Patterns , 2002 .

[24]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Faithfulness and reduplicative identity , 1995 .

[25]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[26]  Donca Steriade,et al.  The Phonology of Perceptibility Effects: The P-Map and Its Consequences for Constraint Organization , 2008 .

[27]  J. Pierce.  An introduction to information theory: symbols, signals & noise , 1980 .

[28]  Keren Rice,et al.  On the patterning of voiced stops in loanwords in Japanese , 2006 .

[29]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[30]  Kazutaka Kurisu,et al.  The Phonology of Morpheme Realization , 2002 .

[31]  Edward Flemming,et al.  Auditory Representations in Phonology , 2002 .

[32]  Jason A. Shaw,et al.  Predictability and phonology: past, present and future , 2018, Linguistics Vanguard.

[33]  M. Aylett,et al.  Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Andries W. Coetzee,et al.  Frequency biases in phonological variation , 2013 .

[35]  Junko Ito,et al.  Morphological contrast and merger: ranuki in Japanese , 2004 .

[36]  Rory Turnbull,et al.  Patterns of probabilistic segment deletion/reduction in English and Japanese , 2018, Linguistics Vanguard.

[37]  Jason A. Shaw,et al.  Effects of Surprisal and Entropy on Vowel Duration in Japanese , 2019, Language and speech.

[38]  Shin-Ichiro Sano.  Durational contrast in gemination and informativity , 2018, Linguistics Vanguard.

[39]  Sarah Babinski,et al.  Mergers in Bardi: contextual probability and predictors of sound change , 2018, Linguistics Vanguard.

[40]  Curt Rice,et al.  Gaps and repairs at the phonology–morphology interface , 2007, Journal of Linguistics.

[41]  Steven T. Piantadosi,et al.  The communicative function of ambiguity in language , 2011, Cognition.

[42]  Alice Turk,et al.  The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A Functional Explanation for Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Prominence, and Duration in Spontaneous Speech , 2004, Language and speech.

[43]  Anna Lubowicz,et al.  Contrast preservation in phonological mappings , 2003 .

[44]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Generalized alignment , 1993 .

[45]  K. Maekawa.  CORPUS OF SPONTANEOUS JAPANESE : ITS DESIGN AND EVALUATION , 2003 .

[46]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[47]  Diamandis Gafos.  A-Templatic Reduplication , 1998, Linguistic Inquiry.

[48]  B. Elan Dresher,et al.  The impact of allophony versus contrast on speech perception , 2008 .

[49]  Elizabeth Hume,et al.  The impact of impartial phonological contrast on speech perception , 2003 .

[50]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology , 1994 .

[51]  William D. Raymond,et al.  Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production , 2008 .

[52]  Junko Ito.  The phonology of voincing in Japanese , 1986 .

[53]  J. Sullivan.  ON CARTESIAN LINGUISTICS , 1977 .