Multilayer network model for analysis and management of change propagation

A pervasive problem for engineering change management is the phenomenon of change propagation by which a change to one part or element of a design requires additional changes throughout the product. This paper introduces a multilayer network model integrating three coupled layers, or domains, of product development that contribute to change propagation: namely, the product layer, change layer, and social layer. The model constitutes a holistic, data-driven approach to the analysis and management of change propagation. A baseline repository of tools and metrics is developed for the analysis and management of change propagation using the model. The repository includes a few novel tools and metrics, most notably the Engineer Change Propagation Index (Engineer-CPI) and Propagation Directness (PD), as well as others already existing in the literature. As such, the multilayer network model unifies previous research on change propagation in a comprehensive paradigm. A case study of a large technical program, which managed over 41,000 change requests in 8 years, is employed to demonstrate the model’s practical utility. Most significantly, the case study explores the program’s social layer and discovers a correspondence between the propagation effects of an engineer’s work and factors such as his/her organizational role and the context of his/her assignments. The study also reveals that parent–child propagation often spanned two or more product interfaces, thus confirming the counterintuitive possibility of indirect propagation between nonadjacent product components or subsystems. Finally, the study finds that most changes did not lead to any propagation. Propagation that did occur always stopped after five, and rarely more than four, generations of descendants.

[1]  Monica L. Giffin Change propagation in large technical systems , 2007 .

[2]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices , 2007 .

[3]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Innovations in Design Through Transformation: A Fundamental Study of Transformation Principles , 2009 .

[4]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Change and customisation in complex engineering domains , 2004 .

[5]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Change Propagation Analysis in Complex Technical Systems , 2009 .

[6]  Keith Nichols Getting Engineering Changes under Control , 1990 .

[7]  Eun Suk Suh,et al.  Flexible product platforms: framework and case study , 2007, DAC 2006.

[8]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Patterns of Product Development Interactions , 2002 .

[9]  Eun Suk Suh Flexible Product Platforms , 2005 .

[10]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Pitfalls of engineering change: change practice during complex product design , 2004 .

[11]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[12]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[13]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Design change and complexity , 2005 .

[14]  I. C. Wright,et al.  A review of research into engineering change management: implications for product design , 1997 .

[15]  Leonard E. Miller,et al.  NASA systems engineering handbook , 1995 .

[16]  Jason E Bartolomei Qualitative knowledge construction for engineering systems : extending the design structure matrix methodology in scope and procedure , 2007 .

[17]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Predicting technical communication in product development organizations , 1995 .

[18]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[19]  C. Terwiesch,et al.  Managing the Process of Engineering Change Orders: The Case of the Climate Control System in Automobile Development , 1999 .

[20]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Current practices of engineering change management in UK manufacturing industries , 1999 .

[21]  Reinhard Diestel,et al.  Graph Theory , 1997 .

[22]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Understanding the effects of product architecture on technical communication in product develoment organizations , 2000 .

[23]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[24]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Predicting change propagation in complex design , 2004 .