Patenting and Research and Development: A Global View

Using a new global data base on patents and innovation inputs, the authors examine the process of knowledge creation measured by the dynamic relationship between research and development and U.S. patents granted. They confirm at the country level the recurrent micro-level finding of a strong relationship between the two and estimate the OECD elasticity to be effectively equal to one. This conflicts with the frequent micro-level finding of strongly diminishing returns in knowledge generation and suggests the importance of knowledge spillover effects measurable only at the aggregate level. Developing countries, however, do show diminishing returns. The authors then explain the differences in spillovers between the OECD and developing countries by testing for the impact of measures of the functioning of the national innovation system-the set of institutions and agents that create and disseminate knowledge. Across the entire sample education, security of intellectual property rights, and in some specifications, the quality of research institutions and their interaction with the private sector, affect the transformation of research and development into patents.

[1]  P. Hertog,et al.  Innovative clusters: drivers of national innovation systems , 2001 .

[2]  正弘 中舘 OECD (経済開発協力機構) : Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development , 1991 .

[3]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data , 1982 .

[4]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  Research, Patenting, and Technological Change , 1997 .

[5]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Patents, citations & innovations: A window on the knowledge economy , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Charles I. Jones,et al.  R & D-Based Models of Economic Growth , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  Jennifer F. Reinganum The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion , 1989 .

[8]  T. C. Edens,et al.  Economic Growth , 1957, The Journal of Economic History.

[9]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Lee Branstetter,et al.  Are Knowledge Spillovers International or Intranational in Scope? Microeconometric Evidence from the Japan and the United States , 1996 .

[11]  M. Arellano,et al.  Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models , 1995 .

[12]  Richard Blundell,et al.  Individual effects and dynamics in count data models , 2002 .

[13]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Who Does R&D and Who Patents? , 1982 .

[14]  Anke Hoeffler,et al.  GMM Estimation of Empirical Growth Models , 2001 .

[15]  M. Arellano Panel Data Econometrics , 2002 .

[16]  G. Grossman,et al.  Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth , 1989 .

[17]  F. Windmeijer A Finite Sample Correction for the Variance of Linear Two-Step GMM Estimators , 2000 .

[18]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[19]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  Assessing the Contribution of Venture Capital to Innovation , 2000 .

[20]  M. Nerlove,et al.  Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects , 1988 .

[21]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Patents and R and D at the Firm Level: A First Look , 1980 .

[22]  R. Barro,et al.  International Data on Educational Attainment Updates and Implications , 2000 .

[23]  Lee G. Branstetter Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? ☆: Microeconometric evidence from the U.S. and Japan , 2001 .

[24]  R. Lucas On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[25]  R. Evenson,et al.  International Invention: Implications for Technology Market Analysis , 1984 .

[26]  K. Green National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[27]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  Productivity Differences , 1999 .

[28]  P. Howitt,et al.  Endogenous Growth Theory , 1999 .

[29]  B. Lundvall,et al.  National systems of production, innovation and competence building , 2002 .

[30]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[31]  Stephen Nickell,et al.  Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects , 1981 .

[32]  R. Blundell,et al.  Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models , 1998 .

[33]  T. Beck,et al.  Financial Intermediation and Growth: Causality and Causes , 1999 .

[34]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  Equilibrium R&D and the patent-R&D ratio: U.S. evidence , 1993 .

[35]  C. I. Jones,et al.  Measuring the Social Return to R&D , 1997 .

[36]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[37]  Paul M. Romer,et al.  Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization , 1987 .

[38]  R. Blundell,et al.  Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation , 1994 .

[39]  F. Windmeijer A Finite Sample Correction for the Variance of Linear Two-Step GMM Estimators , 2000 .

[40]  Jennifer F. Reinganum Practical Implications of Game Theoretic Models of R and D , 1983 .

[41]  Manuel Trajtenberg Innovation in Israel 1968-97: a Comparative Analysis Using Patent Data , 1999 .

[42]  Gary Chamberlain,et al.  Comment: Sequential Moment Restrictions in Panel Data , 1992 .

[43]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[44]  Edward Leamer Sources of Comparative Advantage , 1984 .

[45]  C. I. Jones,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? The Economics of Investment in R&D , 1999 .

[46]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity , 2000 .

[47]  Francesco Caselli,et al.  Reopening the convergence debate: A new look at cross-country growth empirics , 1996 .

[48]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  A Stochastic Model of Applied Research , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[49]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first report , 1980 .

[50]  P. Segerstrom,et al.  A Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle , 1990 .

[51]  J. Wooldridge Multiplicative Panel Data Models Without the Strict Exogeneity Assumption , 1997, Econometric Theory.

[52]  M. Arellano,et al.  Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations , 1991 .

[53]  L. Bottazzi,et al.  Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence from European Patent Data , 2002 .

[54]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Patents and R&D: is There a Lag? , 1984 .