Batteries in Offshore Support Vessels - Pollution, Climate Impact and Economics

This paper assesses the pros and the cons of installing batteries on offshore support vessels. These vessels are specially designed to provide services to oil and gas operations, such as anchor handling, supply and subsea operations. They have multiple engines and advanced dynamic positioning systems to ensure that they can perform their duties with high reliability at nearly any sea state. Combined with high safety requirements, this has resulted in general operational patterns with vessels running multiple combustion engines even at calm water conditions. For emissions, low engine loads yield high emissions of exhaust gases such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) and aerosols such as black carbon (BC), due to less favorable combustion conditions. The high span for these vessels between low loads and high, and their great need for potential power at short notice, motivate our examination of hybrid setups with electric: the vessel segment should be more favorable than many. We find that combining batteries with combustion engines reduces local pollution and climate impact, while the economics with current battery cost and fuel prices is good enough for new vessels, but not good enough for retrofits.

[1]  A. Lloyd,et al.  Seakeeping: Ship Behaviour in Rough Weather , 1998 .

[2]  A. Hall,et al.  September sea-ice cover in the Arctic Ocean projected to vanish by 2100 , 2009 .

[3]  James J. Corbett,et al.  Black carbon from ships: a review of the effects of ship speed, fuel quality and exhaust gas scrubbing , 2012 .

[4]  Bjørn Egil Asbjørnslett,et al.  Assessment of profit, cost and emissions by varying speed as a function of sea conditions and freight market , 2013 .

[5]  Juan Moreno-Gutiérrez,et al.  The impact of marine engine operation and maintenance on emissions , 2012 .

[6]  Sverre Steen,et al.  Assessment of profit, cost, and emissions for slender bulk vessel designs , 2014 .

[7]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  Maritime shipping and emissions: A three-layered, damage-based approach , 2015 .

[8]  J. Hansen,et al.  Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  H. Burtscher,et al.  Particulate Emissions from a Low-Speed Marine Diesel Engine , 2007 .

[10]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change : the IPCC scientific assessment , 1990 .

[11]  Malin Ehleskog Low Temperature Combustion in a Heavy Duty Diesel Engine , 2012 .

[12]  Kjetil Fagerholt,et al.  Optimal policies for maintaining a supply service in the Norwegian Sea , 2000 .

[13]  Charles S. Zender Cryoscience: Snowfall brightens Antarctic future , 2012 .

[14]  A. Stromman,et al.  Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and cost by shipping at lower speeds , 2011 .

[15]  Jyrki Ristimäki,et al.  Chemical and physical characterization of exhaust particulate matter from a marine medium speed diesel engine , 2010 .

[16]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Economic savings linked to future Arctic shipping trade are at odds with climate change mitigation , 2016 .

[17]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  J. A. Silberman,et al.  Arctic shipping emissions inventories and future scenarios , 2010 .

[19]  Jón Egill Kristjánsson,et al.  Arctic surface temperature change to emissions of black carbon within Arctic or midlatitudes , 2013 .

[20]  Keith P. Shine,et al.  The global warming potential—the need for an interdisciplinary retrial , 2009 .

[21]  Alan Caruba,et al.  THE SOCIETY OF NAVAL ARCHITECTS AND MARINE ENGINEERS. , 1978 .