Caller Number Five and related timing games

There are two varieties of timing games in economics: wars of attrition, in which having more predecessors helps, and pre-emption games, in which having more predecessors hurts. This paper introduces and explores a spanning class with rank-order payoffs that subsumes both varieties as special cases. We assume time is continuous, actions are unobserved, and information is complete, and explore how equilibria of the games, in which there is shifting between phases of slow and explosive (positive probability) stopping, capture many economic and social timing phenomena. Inspired by auction theory, we first show how each symmetric Nash equilibrium is equivalent to a different “potential function.” By using this function, we straightforwardly obtain existence and characterization results. Descartes’ Rule of Signs bounds the number of phase transitions. We describe how adjacent timing game phases interact: war of attrition phases are not played out as long as they would be in isolation, but instead are cut short by pre-emptive atoms. We bound the number of equilibria, and compute the payoff and duration of each equilibrium. K. Games of timing, war of attrition, preemption game. JEL . C73, D81.

[1]  Michael R. Baye,et al.  The all-pay auction with complete information , 1990 .

[2]  Rida Laraki,et al.  Continuous-time games of timing , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[3]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[4]  S. Hart,et al.  Potential, value, and consistency , 1989 .

[5]  M. Ostrovsky,et al.  Synchronization Under Uncertainty , 2005 .

[6]  A. McLennan The Expected Number of Nash Equilibria of a Normal Form Game , 2005 .

[7]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  A Theory of Exit in Duopoly , 1986 .

[8]  Samuel Karlin,et al.  Mathematical Methods and Theory in Games, Programming, and Economics , 1961 .

[9]  C. Cannings,et al.  The Generalized War of Attrition , 1997 .

[10]  Jonathan D. Levin Bubbles and Crashes , 2006 .

[11]  Charles A. Wilson,et al.  You have printed the following article : The War of Attrition in Continuous Time with Complete Information , 2007 .

[12]  Philipp Schmidt-Dengler,et al.  N-Player Preemption Games , 2007 .

[13]  J. M. Smith The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Peter M. Kort,et al.  Investment in Oligopoly Under Uncertainty: Accordion Effect , 2006 .

[15]  Dan Levin,et al.  Investment dynamics with common and private values , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[16]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Preemption and Rent Equalization in the Adoption of New Technology , 1985 .

[17]  L. Shapley,et al.  Potential Games , 1994 .

[18]  Dilip Abreu,et al.  Bargaining, Reputation and Equilibrium Selection in Repeated Games with Contracts , 2007 .

[19]  Dan Levin,et al.  To grab for the market or to bide one's time: a dynamic model of entry , 2003 .

[20]  Tetsuya Shinkai,et al.  Second Mover Disadvantages in a Three-Player Stackelberg Game with Private Information , 2000, J. Econ. Theory.

[21]  R. Myerson,et al.  Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs , 1982 .

[22]  Gradimir V. Milovanovic,et al.  Topics in polynomials - extremal problems, inequalities, zeros , 1994 .

[23]  Nicolas Sahuguet Volunteering for heterogeneous tasks , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..

[24]  Ron Siegel,et al.  All-Pay Contests , 2009 .