Research Methods in Psycholinguistic Investigations of Sign Language Processing

[1]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  The activation of spatial antecedents from overt pronouns in american sign language , 1991 .

[2]  Gary Morgan,et al.  Recognition of signed and spoken language: Different sensory inputs, the same segmentation procedure , 2010 .

[3]  D. Corina,et al.  Phonological similarity in American Sign Language , 2002 .

[4]  J Stungis,et al.  Identification and discrimination of handshape in American Sign Language , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  B Woll,et al.  Categorical Perception of Face Actions: Their Role in Sign Language and in Communicative Facial Displays , 1999, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  A. Hohenberger,et al.  Modality-dependent aspects of sign language production. Evidence from slips of the hands and their repairs in German Sign Language (DGS) , 2002 .

[7]  S D Fischer,et al.  Looking through phonological shape to lexical meaning: The bottleneck of non-native sign language processing , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[8]  R. Mayberry,et al.  First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second-language acquisition: the case of American Sign Language. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  Karen Emmorey.  Non-antecedent Suppression in American Sign Language , 1997 .

[10]  U. Bellugi,et al.  Effects of age of acquisition on grammatical sensitivity: Evidence from on-line and off-line tasks , 1995, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[11]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  Laughter among deaf signers. , 2006, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[12]  V. L. Hanson,et al.  Visual and production similarity of the handshapes of the American manual alphabet , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Josep Quer,et al.  Lexical access in Catalan Signed Language (LSC) production , 2008, Cognition.

[14]  K. Emmorey,et al.  Repetition priming with aspect and agreement morphology in American Sign Language , 1991, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  “Tip of the Fingers” Experiences by Deaf Signers , 2005, Psychological science.

[16]  Rachel I. Mayberry,et al.  The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: Another look at the critical period for language acquisition , 1991 .

[17]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  When does iconicity in sign language matter? , 2013, Language and cognitive processes.

[18]  Roberta Michnick Golinkoff,et al.  The perception of handshapes in American Sign Language , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[19]  D. Brentari,et al.  Categorical perception in American Sign Language , 2003 .

[20]  David P. Corina,et al.  Perceptual invariance or orientation specificity in American Sign Language? Evidence from repetition priming for signs and gestures , 2011 .

[21]  Robin L. Thompson,et al.  Eye gaze during comprehension of American Sign Language by native and beginning signers. , 2009, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[22]  Tobias Haug,et al.  Adapting tests of sign language assessment for other sign languages--a review of linguistic, cultural, and psychometric problems. , 2008, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[23]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Effects of sign language experience on categorical perception of dynamic ASL pseudosigns , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[24]  F. Grosjean.  Sign & Word Recognition: A First Comparison , 2013 .

[25]  David P Vinson,et al.  The link between form and meaning in British sign language: effects of iconicity for phonological decisions. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  V C Tartter,et al.  Perceiving minimal distinctions in ASL under normal and point-light display conditions , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Gene Mirus,et al.  Cybersign and new proximities: Impacts of new communication technologies on space and language , 2008 .

[28]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  Preliminaries to a distinctive feature analysis of handshapes in American Sign Language , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Jill P. Morford,et al.  Sign Perception and Recognition in Non-Native Signers of ASL , 2011, Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development.

[30]  G W Heiman,et al.  Intelligibility and comprehension of time compressed sign language narratives , 1981, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[31]  David P. Vinson,et al.  The British Sign Language (BSL) norms for age of acquisition, familiarity, and iconicity , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[32]  K. Emmorey,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition Effects of Iconicity and Semantic Relatedness on Lexical Access in American Sign Language , 2010 .

[33]  Peter Birkholz,et al.  Movements and Holds in Fluent Sentence Production of American Sign Language: The Action-Based Approach , 2011, Cognitive Computation.

[34]  U. Bellugi,et al.  Perception of American sign language in dynamic point-light displays. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  H Poizner,et al.  Visual and "phonetic" coding of movement: evidence from American sign language. , 1981, Science.

[36]  Christian Lachaud,et al.  Handshape monitoring: Evaluation of linguistic and perceptual factors in the processing of American Sign Language , 2012, Language and cognitive processes.

[37]  F. Grosjean,et al.  Sign Recognition Processes in American Sign Language: the Effect of Context , 1982 .

[38]  L A Delhorne,et al.  Effects of rate of presentation on the reception of American Sign Language. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[39]  P. B. Braem.  Rhythmic Temporal Patterns in the Signing of Deaf Early and Late Learners of Swiss German Sign Language , 1999 .

[40]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  The influence of visual feedback and register changes on sign language production: A kinematic study with deaf signers. , 2009, Applied psycholinguistics.

[41]  C M Reed,et al.  A study of the tactual reception of sign language. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[42]  S. Garrod.  Psycholinguistic Research Methods , 2006 .

[43]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Lexical processing in Spanish Sign Language (LSE) , 2008 .

[44]  David P. Corina,et al.  Exploring perceptual processing of ASL and human actions: Effects of inversion and repetition priming , 2012, Cognition.

[45]  Neil Fox,et al.  The hands and mouth do not always slip together in British Sign Language: Dissociating articulatory channels in the lexicon , 2009 .

[46]  Ruth B. Grossman,et al.  To Capture a Face: A Novel Technique for the Analysis and Quantification of Facial Expressions in American Sign Language , 2006 .

[47]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  Processing spatial anaphora: Referent reactivation with overt and null pronouns in american sign language , 1995 .

[48]  Jill P. Morford,et al.  Effects of language experience on the perception of American Sign Language , 2008, Cognition.

[49]  K. Emmorey,et al.  Lexical Recognition in Sign Language: Effects of Phonetic Structure and Morphology , 1990, Perceptual and motor skills.

[50]  Robin L. Thompson,et al.  The link between form and meaning in American Sign Language: lexical processing effects. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  Ruth Campbell,et al.  Forced Choice Recognition of Sign in Novice Learners of British Sign Language. , 1992 .

[52]  Gary Morgan,et al.  Making sense of nonsense in British Sign Language (BSL): The contribution of different phonological parameters to sign recognition , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[53]  Rachel I. Mayberry,et al.  Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure , 2006 .

[54]  P. Hauser,et al.  When Is a Difference Really Different? Learners' Discrimination of Linguistic Contrasts in American Sign Language. , 2011 .

[55]  Ryan D. Tweney,et al.  Psychological Processing of Sign Language: Effects of Visual Disruption on Sign Intelligibility. , 1977 .

[56]  H Poizner,et al.  Perception of movement in American Sign Language: Effects of linguistic structure and linguistic experience , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  L. Feldman,et al.  Language specificity in lexical organization: Evidence from deaf signers' lexical organization of American Sign Language and English , 1989, Memory & cognition.