A conceptual model of team dynamical behaviors and performance in human-autonomy teaming

Abstract The focus of this study is to bring new insights on the relationship between team dynamics and performance at the systems (i.e. global) level. In this light, we describe a body of research that identifies characteristics of team dynamics and their relation to team performance. Non-linear dynamical systems methods were applied to communication and coordination behaviors of teams in two different studies: human-synthetic agent teams in a Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) simulated task environment and human-dyads in a simulated victim locator Minecraft task environment. An inverted U-shaped model was discovered that related team coordination and team performance. Specifically, we identified that Human-Autonomy Team (HAT)s were rigid compared to all-human teams that were least stable; and the extreme stability and instability is associated with low levels of team performance. Based on this model, we hypothesize that (1) with enough training and experience, teams should become increasingly stable, ultimately reaching an optimal blend of stability and flexibility and (2) as autonomous agents become increasingly flexible and adaptive, HATs should trend toward this moderate level of stability.

[1]  H. Haken Synergetics: an Introduction, Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and Self-organization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology , 1977 .

[2]  Travis J. Wiltshire,et al.  Technology as Teammate: Examining the Role of External Cognition in Support of Team Cognitive Processes , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[3]  Janice Langan-Fox,et al.  Human–automation teams and adaptable control for future air traffic management , 2009 .

[4]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments , 2006, Ergonomics.

[5]  D. Ruelle,et al.  Recurrence Plots of Dynamical Systems , 1987 .

[6]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Human-Robot Teaming in Urban Search and Rescue , 2015 .

[7]  M R Endsley,et al.  Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[8]  A. Goldberger Is the normal heartbeat chaotic or homeostatic? , 1991, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[9]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[10]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming , 2018, Hum. Factors.

[12]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[13]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  The synthetic teammate project , 2009, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[14]  M. Losada,et al.  The complex dynamics of high performance teams , 1999 .

[15]  A. Goldberger Fractal Variability Versus Pathologic Periodicity: Complexity Loss and Stereotypy in Disease , 1997, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[16]  Moshe Farjoun Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[17]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Designing a Synthetic Task Environment , 2017 .

[18]  Mustafa Demir,et al.  The Impact of Coordination Quality on Coordination Dynamics and Team Performance: When Humans Team with Autonomy , 2017 .

[19]  Henry D. I. Abarbanel,et al.  Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data , 1995 .

[20]  Riccardo Fusaroli,et al.  Investigating Conversational Dynamics: Interactive Alignment, Interpersonal Synergy, and Collective Task Performance , 2016, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Emily D. Heaphy,et al.  The Role of Positivity and Connectivity in the Performance of Business Teams , 2004 .

[22]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Coordinated Awareness of Situation by Teams (CAST): Measuring Team Situation Awareness of a Communication Glitch , 2005 .

[23]  A. Wolf,et al.  Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series , 1985 .

[24]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Synchrony and swing in conversation: coordination, temporal dynamics and communication , 2008 .

[25]  Marialena Vagia,et al.  A literature review on the levels of automation during the years. What are the different taxonomies that have been proposed? , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Dynamical analysis in real time: detecting perturbations to team communication , 2012, Ergonomics.

[27]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Team coordination dynamics. , 2010, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[28]  Jamie C. Gorman,et al.  Understanding and Modeling Teams As Dynamical Systems , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[29]  F.E. Cellier,et al.  High-autonomy control of space resource processing plants , 1993, IEEE Control Systems.

[30]  Axel Schulte,et al.  Design Patterns for Human-Cognitive Agent Teaming , 2016, HCI.

[31]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  The Impact of Perceived Autonomous Agents on Dynamic Team Behaviors , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence.

[32]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems , 2009 .

[33]  Travis J. Wiltshire,et al.  Problem-Solving Phase Transitions During Team Collaboration , 2018, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  Riccardo Sartori,et al.  Advanced Modeling Methods for Studying Individual Differences and Dynamics in Organizations: Introduction to the Special Issue. , 2018, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[35]  S. Guastello Nonlinear dynamical systems for theory and research in ergonomics , 2017, Ergonomics.

[36]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  The self organization of human interaction , 2013 .

[37]  John R. Anderson How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe , 2007 .

[38]  Niek J. E. Wijngaards,et al.  Towards Sustained Team Effectiveness , 2005, BNAIC.

[39]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Team situation awareness within the context of human-autonomy teaming , 2017, Cognitive Systems Research.

[40]  S. Russell,et al.  Physio-behavioral coupling in a cooperative team task: contributors and relations. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Stephen M Fiore,et al.  Augmenting team cognition in human-automation teams performing in complex operational environments. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[42]  M. Rosenstein,et al.  A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets , 1993 .

[43]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  The organizational neurodynamics of teams. , 2013, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[44]  H. Kantz,et al.  Nonlinear time series analysis , 1997 .

[45]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Neural signatures of team coordination are revealed by multifractal analysis , 2014, Social neuroscience.

[46]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Interactive Team Cognition , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[47]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Ten Challenges for Making Automation a "Team Player" in Joint Human-Agent Activity , 2004, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[48]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Measuring Patterns in Team Interaction Sequences Using a Discrete Recurrence Approach , 2012, Hum. Factors.