Phytoplankton communities and biomass size structure (fractionated chlorophyll “a”), along trophic gradients of the Basque coast (northern Spain)

Eutrophication is a major threat to coastal ecosystems. Within Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) has established the need of developing methods of assessment. Bulk chlorophyll “a” is used world-wide as an indicator of eutrophication. However, the size structure of the phytoplankton communities has not been investigated, in detail, in relation to eutrophication pressures. This study investigates the suitability of fractionated chlorophyll “a” (<10 and >10 μm), as an indicator of eutrophication. Along the Basque coast (northern Spain) several water bodies, ranging from offshore waters to the heads of the estuaries, were surveyed during 2008. Physico-chemical conditions and chlorophyll “a” showed a distinct spatial gradient. Trophic richness increased towards the middle and inner parts of the estuaries, where nutrient inputs, from natural or anthropogenic sources, together with the residence time of the water are usually higher. In summer, phytoplankton biomass and abundance decreased, generally, in offshore and coastal waters; in estuaries, they tended to increase. The chlorophyll distribution within the two size fractions was coherent with the phytoplankton taxonomic composition. In summer, the relative abundance of small-sized cells (diatoms and non-siliceous taxa) increased. The relationships between size-fractionated chlorophyll and physico-chemical variables differed, when comparing the offshore and coastal waters, with the estuaries. In the offshore and coastal waters, a strong seasonality was observed; in estuaries, an important spatial component was found. Fractionated chlorophyll provided complementary useful information on anthropogenic pressures. However, more research is necessary to utilise this variable as a tool for ecological status assessment, within the WFD.

[1]  G. F. Humphrey,et al.  New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton , 1975 .

[2]  F. Rassoulzadegan,et al.  Plankton and nutrient dynamics in marine waters , 1995 .

[3]  George Tsirtsis,et al.  Ecological indices : a biometric approach for assessing eutrophication levels in the marine environment , 1996 .

[4]  E. Marañón,et al.  Phytoplankton size structure and primary production in a highly dynamic coastal ecosystem (Ria de Vigo, NW-Spain): Seasonal and short-time scale variability , 2006 .

[5]  É. Nézan,et al.  Variability patterns of microphytoplankton communities along the French coasts , 2002 .

[6]  J. M. Zaldívar,et al.  Simple tools for assessing water quality and trophic status in transitional water ecosystems , 2009 .

[7]  L. Legendre,et al.  Seasonal Dynamics and Potential Fate of Size-fractionated Phytoplankton in a Temperate Nearshore Environment (Western Gulf of St Lawrence, Canada) , 1999 .

[8]  R. Margalef Life-forms of phytoplankton as survival alternatives in an unstable environment , 1978 .

[9]  H. Paerl,et al.  Phytoplankton Photopigments as Indicators of Estuarine and Coastal Eutrophication , 2003 .

[10]  D. B. Nedwell,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of phytoplanktonic primary production, nutrient and light availability along a turbid, eutrophic UK east coast estuary (the Colne Estuary) , 2002 .

[11]  A. G. Pérez Métodos avanzados de estadística aplicada: métodos robustos y de remuestreo , 2005 .

[12]  Alison J. Gilbert,et al.  How well do ecosystem indicators communicate the effects of anthropogenic eutrophication , 2009 .

[13]  R. E. Turner Some Effects of Eutrophication on Pelagic and Demersal Marine Food Webs , 2013 .

[14]  Mike Best,et al.  Setting nutrient thresholds to support an ecological assessment based on nutrient enrichment, potential primary production and undesirable disturbance. , 2007, Marine Pollution Bulletin.

[15]  J. Franco,et al.  Main characteristics of the water masses , 2004 .

[16]  Juan Bald,et al.  Assessment of the phytoplankton ecological status in the Basque coast (northern Spain) according to the European Water Framework Directive , 2009 .

[17]  E. Orive,et al.  Phytoplankton Assemblages and Their Dominant Pigments in the Nervion River Estuary , 2005, Hydrobiologia.

[18]  Petr Šmilauer,et al.  CANOCO 4.5 Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination , 2002 .

[19]  I. Madariaga,et al.  Size-fractionated phytoplankton biomass, primary production and respiration in the Nervión-Ibaizabal estuary: a comparison with other nearshore coastal and estuarine ecosystems from the Bay of Biscay. , 2009 .

[20]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[21]  J. González‐Oreja,et al.  Assessing the improvement of the Bilbao estuary water quality in response to pollution abatement measures. , 2006, Water research.

[22]  L. Harding Long-term trends in the distribution of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay: roles of light, nutrients and streamflow , 1994 .

[23]  O. Hayes,et al.  Morphology of sand accumulation in estuaries: An introduction to the sympos , 1975 .

[24]  E. Orive,et al.  Seasonal variations of diatoms and dinoflagellates in a shallow, temperate estuary, with emphasis on neritic assemblages , 2001, Hydrobiologia.

[25]  A. Bode,et al.  Influence of water-column stability on phytoplankton size and biomass succession patterns in the central Cantabrian Sea (Bay of Biscay) , 1992 .

[26]  E. Marañón,et al.  Maximum photosynthetic efficiency of size‐fractionated phytoplankton assessed by 14C uptake and fast repetition rate fluorometry , 2005 .

[27]  A. Bode,et al.  Succession of phytoplankton assemblages in relation to the hydrography in the southern Bay of Biscay: a multivariate approach , 1994 .

[28]  C. Gobler,et al.  Eutrophication and Harmful Algal Blooms: A Scientific Consensus. , 2008, Harmful algae.

[29]  E. Orive,et al.  Bacterial and phytoplankton dynamics along a trophic gradient in a shallow temperate estuary , 2000 .

[30]  I. Muxika,et al.  Assessing reference conditions and physico-chemical status according to the European Water Framework Directive: a case-study from the Basque Country (Northern Spain). , 2005, Marine pollution bulletin.

[31]  Hugh L. MacIntyre,et al.  Temporal and spatial variability in Pseudo-nitzschia spp. in Alabama coastal waters: A “hot spot” linked to submarine groundwater discharge? , 2009 .

[32]  R. Anadón,et al.  Seasonal compensation of microbial production and respiration in a temperate sea , 1999 .

[33]  Xabier Irigoien,et al.  Changes in plankton size structure and composition, during the generation of a phytoplankton bloom, in the central Cantabrian sea. , 2008 .

[34]  E. Orive,et al.  Microplankton metabolism along a trophic gradient in a shallow-temperate estuary , 2002 .

[35]  S. L'Helguen,et al.  Size-fractionated phytoplankton biomass and nitrogen uptake in response to high nutrient load in the North Biscay Bay in spring , 2009 .

[36]  P. Tréguer,et al.  Impacts of high-nitrate freshwater inputs on macrotidal ecosystems. II. Specific role of the silicic acid pump in the year-round dominance of diatoms in the Bay of Brest (France) , 1997 .

[37]  A. Barbosa,et al.  Nutrients, light and phytoplankton succession in a temperate estuary (the Guadiana, south-western Iberia) , 2005 .

[38]  D. Mouillot,et al.  Alternatives to taxonomic-based approaches to assess changes in transitional water communities , 2006 .

[39]  E. Orive,et al.  Monitoring phytoplankton assemblages in estuarine waters: The application of pigment analysis and microscopy to size-fractionated samples , 2006 .

[40]  D. Sivyer,et al.  Environmental controls on phytoplankton community composition in the Thames plume, U.K. , 2008 .

[41]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[42]  A. Barbosa,et al.  Constraints on the use of phytoplankton as a biological quality element within the Water Framework Directive in Portuguese waters. , 2008, Marine pollution bulletin.

[43]  E. Orive,et al.  Chapter 15 – Bacterioplankton and phytoplankton communities , 2004 .

[44]  Juan Bald,et al.  Using multiple ecosystem components, in assessing ecological status in Spanish (Basque Country) Atlantic marine waters. , 2009, Marine pollution bulletin.

[45]  L. Legendre,et al.  A model for the size‐fractionated biomass and production of marine phytoplankton , 1994 .

[46]  Donald M. Anderson,et al.  Toxic Marine Phytoplankton , 1987 .

[47]  Á. Borja,et al.  Chapter 23 - Overall assessment - human impacts and quality status , 2004 .

[48]  A. Cearreta,et al.  Chapter 2 - Human activities along the Basque coast during the last two centuries: geological perspective of recent anthropogenic impact on the coast and its environmental consequences , 2004 .

[49]  Á. Borja,et al.  Assessing ecological integrity in marine waters, using multiple indices and ecosystem components: challenges for the future. , 2009, Marine pollution bulletin.

[50]  K. Boicourt,et al.  Effects of nutrient enrichment in the nation's estuaries: A decade of change , 2008 .

[51]  Alberto Basset,et al.  Eutrophication in transitional waters: an overview , 2008 .

[52]  X. Morán,et al.  Seasonality of picophytoplankton chlorophyll a and biomass in the central Cantabrian Sea, southern Bay of Biscay , 2008 .

[53]  M. Best,et al.  Dissolved oxygen as a physico-chemical supporting element in the Water Framework Directive. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[54]  T. Fisher Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay , 1992 .

[55]  A. Irwin,et al.  Resource limitation alters the 3/4 size scaling of metabolic rates in phytoplankton , 2004 .

[56]  P. C. Reid,et al.  Case history and persistence of the non-indigenous diatom Coscinodiscus wailesii in the north-east Atlantic , 2001, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[57]  Ter Braak,et al.  Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord , 2002 .

[58]  Hendrik Schubert,et al.  Integrated ecological assessment of Danish Baltic Sea coastal areas by means of phytoplankton and macrophytobenthos , 2005 .

[59]  Chris Ellegaard,et al.  Assessing Reference Conditions According to the European Water Framework Directive Using Modelling and Analysis of Historical Data: An Example from Randers Fjord, Denmark , 2003, Ambio.

[60]  Manfred Ehrhardt,et al.  Methods of seawater analysis , 1999 .

[61]  Juan Bald,et al.  Implementation of the European water framework directive from the Basque country (northern Spain): a methodological approach. , 2004, Marine pollution bulletin.

[62]  M. V. Lafuente Phytoplankton ecology in the Bay of Biscay , 1996 .

[63]  Caroline Cusack,et al.  Establishing boundary classes for the classification of UK marine waters using phytoplankton communities. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[64]  Jon Barry,et al.  Relationships between suspended particulate material, light attenuation and Secchi depth in UK marine waters , 2008 .

[65]  J. M. Trigueros Morphology and distribution of two brackish diatoms (Bacillariophyceae): Cyclotella atomus Hustedt and Thalassiosira guillardii Hasle in the estuary of Urdaibai (northern Spain) , 2000 .

[66]  R. Brazier,et al.  Understanding the influence of suspended solids on water quality and aquatic biota. , 2008, Water research.

[67]  S. Malcolm,et al.  Assessing the impact of nutrient enrichment in estuaries: susceptibility to eutrophication. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[68]  Peter J. Huber,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2005, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[69]  Ángel Borja,et al.  Chapter 7 – Hydrography of the southeastern Bay of Biscay , 2004 .

[70]  Ibon Galparsoro,et al.  The European Water Framework Directive and the DPSIR, a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status , 2006 .

[71]  H. Paerl,et al.  Particle suspensions and their regions of effect in the Neuse River Estuary: Implications for water quality monitoring , 2007 .

[72]  S. Bricker,et al.  An integrated methodology for assessment of estuarine trophic status , 2003 .

[73]  Walter Krämer,et al.  Review of Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. by W.N. Venables and B.D. Ripley. Springer-Verlag 2002 , 2003 .

[74]  A. Newton,et al.  Boundary conditions for the European Water Framework Directive in the Ria Formosa lagoon, Portugal (physico-chemical and phytoplankton quality elements) , 2006 .

[75]  B. Sautour,et al.  Variability of nutrients and phytoplankton primary production in a shallow macrotidal coastal ecosystem (Arcachon Bay, France) , 2008 .

[76]  E. G. Vrieling,et al.  Harmful Marine Algal Blooms , 1995 .

[77]  G. Fogg The phytoplanktonic ways of life. , 1991, The New phytologist.

[78]  B. Cole,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of picocyanobacteria Synechococcus sp. in San Francisco Bay , 2000 .

[79]  F. Taylor,et al.  Phytoplankton ecology of Sechelt Inlet, a fjord system on the British Columbia coast. I. General features of the nano- and microplankton , 1992 .

[80]  F. Rassoulzadegan,et al.  Food-web mediated export of biogenic carbon in oceans: hydrodynamic control , 1996 .

[81]  U. Sommer Are marine diatoms favoured by high Si:N ratios? , 1994 .

[82]  E. Stoermer,et al.  Modification of the biogeochemical cycle of silica with eutrophication , 1993 .

[83]  L. Legendre,et al.  The significance of microalgal blooms for fisheries and for the export of particulate organic carbon in oceans , 1990 .