Impact of dental and zygomatic implants on stress distribution in maxillary defects: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution in the bone around dental and zygomatic implants for 4 different implant-supported obturator prostheses designs in a unilaterally maxillary defect using a 3-dimensional finite element stress analysis. A 3-dimensional finite element model of the human unilateral maxillary defect was constructed. Four different implant-supported obturator prostheses were modeled; model 1 with 2 zygomatic implants and 1 dental implant, model 2 with 2 zygomatic implants and 2 dental implants, model 3 with 2 zygomatic implants and 3 dental implants, and model 4 with 1 zygomatic implant and 3 dental implants. Bar attachments were used as superstructure. A 150-N vertical load was applied in 3 different ways, and von Mises stresses in the cortical bone around implants were evaluated. When the models (model 1-3) were compared in terms of number of implants, all of the models showed similar highest stress values under the first loading condition, and these values were less than under model 4 conditions. The highest stress values of models 1-4 under the first loading condition were 8.56, 8.59, 8.32, and 11.55 Mpa, respectively. The same trend was also observed under the other loading conditions. It may be concluded that the use of a zygomatic implant on the nondefective side decreased the highest stress values, and increasing the number of dental implants between the most distal and most mesial implants on the nondefective side did not decrease the highest stress values.

[1]  B. Schmidt,et al.  Reconstruction of extensive maxillary defects using zygomaticus implants. , 2004, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[2]  Valentim Adelino Ricardo Barão,et al.  Finite Element Analysis to Compare Complete Denture and Implant-Retained Overdentures With Different Attachment Systems , 2009, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[3]  F. Mante,et al.  Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. , 1998, The Journal of oral implantology.

[4]  G E Carlsson,et al.  Bite force and oral function in patients with osseointegrated oral implants. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[5]  M. Sevimay,et al.  Effects of cantilever design and material on stress distribution in fixed partial dentures--a finite element analysis. , 2005, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[6]  H. Meijer,et al.  The incomprehensible success of the implant stabilised overdenture in the edentulous mandible: a literature review on transfer of chewing forces to bone surrounding implants. , 1995, The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry.

[7]  C. Malevez,et al.  Use of zygomatic implants to deal with resorbed posterior maxillae. , 2003, Periodontology 2000.

[8]  Dinçer Bozkaya,et al.  Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  R. Mericske-Stern Force distribution on implants supporting overdentures: the effect of distal bar extensions. A 3-D in vivo study. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  Anita Visser,et al.  Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  R Puers,et al.  Magnitude and distribution of occlusal forces on oral implants supporting fixed prostheses: an in vivo study. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  M. Çehreli,et al.  The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses--a review. , 2002, Journal of dentistry.

[13]  P. Cury,et al.  A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone. , 2008, The Journal of oral implantology.

[14]  M. Çehreli,et al.  Systematic review of prosthetic maintenance requirements for implant-supported overdentures. , 2010, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[15]  F Bosman,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible. , 1994, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[16]  Svatava Konvicková,et al.  Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  V. Barão,et al.  Comparison between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture: effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution. , 2009, Gerodontology.

[18]  A. Caputo,et al.  Stress transfer of four mandibular implant overdenture cantilever designs. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  P. Branemark,et al.  Brånemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. , 1999, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[20]  R. Mericske-Stern,et al.  Overdentures: an alternative implant methodology for edentulous patients. , 1993, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[21]  E. Rocha,et al.  Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA. , 2008, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[22]  S. Sadowsky Treatment considerations for maxillary implant overdentures: a systematic review. , 2007, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[23]  R. H. Batenburg,et al.  Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants. A 5-year prospective study. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[24]  J. Kuiper,et al.  Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  Y. Kizu,et al.  Three-dimensional finite elemental analysis of zygomatic implants in craniofacial structures. , 2007, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[26]  Marion E Kreissl,et al.  Zygoma implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation after partial maxillectomy using surgical navigation: a clinical report. , 2007, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[27]  T. Korioth,et al.  Effect of implant number on transverse bending moments during simulated unilateral loading of mandibular fixed-detachable prostheses. , 1998, The Journal of oral implantology.

[28]  H. Chun,et al.  Stress distributions in maxillary bone surrounding overdenture implants with different overdenture attachments. , 2005, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[29]  P. Branemark,et al.  Remote implant anchorage for the rehabilitation of maxillary defects. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[30]  M. Peñarrocha Diago,et al.  Rehabilitation of severely resorbed maxillae with zygomatic implants: an update. , 2007, Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal.

[31]  Chao Yl,et al.  The incomprehensible success of the implant stabilised overdenture in the edentulous mandible: a literature review on transfer of chewing forces to bone surrounding implants. , 1995 .

[32]  G E Carlsson,et al.  Bite force and state of dentition. , 1977, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[33]  H. Iplikçioğlu,et al.  Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior edentulism. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[34]  J. Sun,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the application of attachment for obturator framework in unilateral maxillary defect. , 2008, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[35]  G. Liu,et al.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[36]  M. Goto,et al.  Measurement of the maxilla and zygoma as an aid in installing zygomatic implants. , 2001, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[37]  R. H. Batenburg,et al.  Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosteal implants. A prospective, comparative study. , 1998, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.